Porous surfaces on orthopaedic implants have been shown to promote tissue ingrowth. This study evaluated biological fixation of novel additively manufactured porous implants with and without hydroxyapatite coatings in a canine transcortical model. Laser rapid manufacturing (LRM) Ti6Al4V cylindrical implants were built with a random interconnected architecture mimicking cancellous bone (5.2 mm diameter, 10mm length, 50–60% porous, mean pore size 450μm). Three groups were investigated in this study: as-built with no coating (LRM), as-built coated with solution precipitated hydroxyapatite (LRM-PA), and as-built coated with a plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite (LRM-PSHA). Implants were press-fit into a 5mm unicortical, perpendicular drill hole in the femoral diaphysis of the left and right femurs in 12 canines. Right femora were harvested for histology (SEM, bone ingrowth into implant within cortical region) and left femora for mechanical push-out testing (shear strength of bone-implant interface) at 4 and 12 weeks (N=6, un-paired Student's t-test, p=0.05). For mean bone ingrowth, there was no significant difference between groups at 4 weeks (LRM, LRM-PA, LRM-PSHA: 41.5+8.6%, 51+5.5% and 53.2+11%, respectively) or 12 weeks (LRM, LRM-PA, LRM-PSHA: 64.4+2.8%, 59.9+7.6%, 64.9+6.4%, respectively). LRM and LRM-PA implants had more bone ingrowth at 12 weeks than 4 weeks (p < 0 .05). Mean shear strength of all implants at 12 weeks (LRM, LRM-PA, LRM-PSHA: 39.9+3.6MPa, 33.7+4.6MPa, 36+4.1MPa respectively) were greater than at 4 weeks (LRM, LRM-PA, LRM-PSHA: 21.6+2.8MPa, 20.7+1.1MPa, 20.2+2.5MPa respectively) (p < 0 .05). No significant difference was observed between all groups at 4 or 12 weeks. Overall, this canine study confirmed the suitability of this novel additive manufacturing porous material for biological fixation by bone ingrowth. All implants exhibited high bone ingrowth and mechanical shear strength in this canine model. No difference was observed between uncoated and hydroxyapatite coated implants.
Many studies have looked at the effect of titanium versus cobalt chrome baseplates on backside wear. However, the surface finish of the materials is usually different [1,2]. There may also be subtle locking mechanism design changes [2]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wear performance of polyethylene inserts when mated with titanium baseplates to cobalt chrome baseplates, where both have non-polished topside surfaces and an identical locking mechanism. A total of three trays per material were used. The titanium trays are intended for cementless application and include a porous titanium surface on the underside, while the cobalt chrome trays are intended for cemented applications. All trays were Triathlon design (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ). Tibial inserts were manufactured from GUR 1020 polyethylene then vacuum/flush packaged and sterilized in nitrogen (30 kGy). Cobalt chrome femoral components were articulated against the tibial inserts. Surface roughness of the baseplates was measured prior to testing using white light interferometry (Zygo, Middlefield, CT). A 6-station knee simulator (MTS, Eden Prairie, MN) was used for testing. A normal walking profile was applied [3]. Testing was conducted for 1 million cycles. A lubricant of Alpha Calf Fraction serum (Hyclone Labs, Logan, UT) diluted to 50% with a pH-balanced 20-mMole solution of deionized water and EDTA was used [4]. The serum solution was replaced and inserts were weighed for wear every 0.5 million cycles. Standard test protocols were used for cleaning, weighing, and assessing the wear loss [5]. Soak control specimens were used to correct for fluid absorption. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test (p < 0.05).INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
