The aim of this study was to assess how biomechanical gait parameters (kinematics, kinetics, and muscle force estimations) differ between patients with camtype FAI and healthy controls, through a systematic search. A systematic review of the literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Medline and EMBASE via OVID SP was undertaken from inception to April 2020 using PRISMA guidelines. Studies that described kinematics, kinetics, and/or estimated muscle forces in cam-type FAI were identified and reviewed.Abstract
Purpose
Methods
Although hip replacement and resurfacing procedures both aim to restore mobility, improve joint function, and relieve pain, it is unclear how each differ in terms of gait mechanics and if they are affected by varying walking speeds. We compared limb symmetry and ground reaction force (GRF) profiles between bilateral total hip arthroplasty patients (THA), bilateral hip resurfacing arthroplasty patients (HRA), and healthy control participants (CON) during level-treadmill walking at different speeds. Bilateral THA and bilateral HRA patients (nTHA = 15; nHRA = 15; postoperative 12–18 months), and age-, mass-, and height-matched CON participants (nCON = 20) underwent gait analysis on an instrumented treadmill. Walking trials started at 4 km/h and increased in 0.5 km/h increments until top walking speed (TWS) was achieved. Gait symmetry index (SI = 0% for symmetry) was assessed between limbs during weight-acceptance, mid-stance and push-off phases of gait; and vertical GRFs were captured for the normalised stance phase using statistical parametric mapping (SPM; CI = 95%).Abstract
Objectives
Methods
Several previous pathoanatomical and biomechanical studies focused primarily on the cam morphology as the primary contributor to symptoms of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and limited range of motion. However, there is a growing population of individuals with asymptomatic cam morphologies who show no clinical signs; thus, the cam deformity, alone, may not fully delineate an individual's symptomatology or limited motion. These studies expanded beyond the cam morphology, to determine how additional anatomical characteristics could contribute to symptoms and influence functional mobility, using: 1)