Traditional teaching recommends against arthroplasty in the index finger, due to concerns over failure with pinch stress, and prefers arthrodesis is for its stability. We aim to allay these fears and present the results of our series of index finger silastic PIPJ arthroplasties. Methods: Between 2007 & 2018 48 silastic index finger PIPJ arthroplasties were undertaken in 37 patients at our Hand Unit. All were performed under local anaesthetic ring block. Eleven patients underwent PIPJ arthroplasty in both Index fingers. Thirty-five women and two men made up the cohort with a mean age of 69 years. A retrospective analysis of all patients has been undertaken to determine the clinical results including patient satisfaction, grip and pinch strength and reoperation rates. Mean follow up was 5.1 years. Six index fingers developed ulnar deviation greater than 10 degrees and there were five reoperations (10.2%). There was an excellent arc of movement of mean 44 degrees with high patient satisfaction and functional scores (mean VAS pain score 1.1, Quickdash 34, PEM 44). 90% of patients would undergo the procedure again and no patient would prefer a fusion. Conclusions: Silastic Interposition arthroplasty of the PIPJ of the Index finger is a durable procedure with excellent clinical outcomes. Our large study refutes the established technique of arthrodesis for Index finger OA, with low incidence of ulnar deviation and excellent patient satisfaction.Background
Results
Conventional teaching advises against using adrenaline with local anaesthetic near end-arteries due to risks of irreversible vasospasm, however there are benefits of adjunctive adrenaline including enhanced anaesthetic effect, prolonged duration and temporary haemostasis. Retrospective analysis was undertaken for all elective finger and distal palmar surgery using digital nerve or field blocks performed by four orthopaedic hand surgeons, during a two-year period in a large teaching hospital. Data collected from theatre databases and clinical notes included procedure type, anaesthetic agent, adrenaline use, tourniquet use and evidence of post-operative digital ischaemia or wound complications. 230 procedures (mean age 59 years) were performed, including 158 cases with plain anaesthetic only (2%, 1% Lidocaine or 0.25% Bupivicaine in 150, 4 and 4 cases respectively) and 72 cases with 0.25% Bupivicaine and adrenaline (1:200,000.) Mean anaesthetic volume was 7.5ml (7.2ml vs 8.0ml without and with adrenaline respectively.) Tourniquet was used in all cases without adrenaline but was not used in 21 (29%) of cases with adrenaline. Mean tourniquet time in each group was 16 minutes. Two post-operative infections occurred in the group without adrenaline with none in the adrenaline group and there were no cases of digital necrosis in either group In the elective setting, adjunctive adrenaline with local anaesthetic does not increase the risk of post-operative infections or digital ischaemia. For proximal finger surgery, where digital tourniquets are often restrictive, using adrenaline can prevent the need for painful arm tourniquets.
