Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a recognized procedure for treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis. Patellofemoral (PF) joint degeneration is widely considered to be a contraindication to medial unicompartmental knee replacement. We examined the validity of this preconception using information gathered prospectively on consecutive patients who underwent UKA using the Repicci II® UKA prosthesis for medial compartment osteoarthritis. We prospectively collected data on 147 consecutive patients who underwent the Repicci II® UKA for medial compartment osteoarthritis. All operations were performed between July 1999 and September 2000 by the same surgeon. The status of the PF joint was assessed intra-operatively in all patients, and accordingly patients were divided into two groups, one group with a normal PF joint, and the second group with degenerative changes of the PF joint. Variables measured for outcome included the International Knee Society (IKS) score, limb alignment, and range of motion. Radiographs were assessed for progression of disease or failure of implant. The mean follow-up was 9.4 years (range: 5–10.7 years). Patients were reviewed initially at 2 weeks, and then at 6 months post-operatively. They were subsequently reviewed on an annual basis. All patients completed an IKS score preoperatively and at last follow-up. Age, gender, BMI, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, all subsequent surgery, including revision of the prosthesis, and survivorship at 10 years was recorded, and results of the 2 groups compared.Introduction
Methods
The advantages of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) include its bone preserving nature, lower relative cost and superior functional results. Some temporary pain has been reported clinically following this procedure. Could this be related to bone remodeling? A validated bone remodeling algorithm may have the answers… A 3D geometry of an intact human cadaveric tibia was generated using CT images. An all poly unicompartmental implant geometry was positioned in an inlay and onlay configuration on the tibia and the post-operative models created. An adaptive bone remodeling algorithm was used with finite element modeling to predict the bone remodeling behavior surrounding the implant in both scenarios. Virtual DEXA images were generated from the model and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in regions of interest in the AP and ML planes. BMD results were compared to clinical results. The bone remodelling algorithm predicted BMD growth in the proximal anterior regions of the tibia, with an inward tendency for both inlay and onlay models. Looking in the AP plane, a maximum of up to 7% BMD growth was predicted and in the ML plane this was as high as 16%. Minimal BMD loss was observed, which suggests minimal disturbance to the natural bone growth following UKA. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans showed active hot spots in the antero- medial regions of the tibia. These results were consistent with the finite element modeling results. Bone remodeling behavior was found to be sensitive to sizing and positioning of the implant. The adaptive bone remodeling algorithm predicted minimal BMD loss and some BMD growth in the anterior region of the tibia following UKA. This is consistent with patient complaint and PET scans.
