Aims

Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses are designed to restore near normal kinematics including high flexion. Kneeling is a high flexion, kinematically demanding activity after TKA. The debate about design choice has not yet been informed by six-degrees-of-freedom in vivo kinematics. This prospective randomized clinical trial compared kneeling kinematics in three TKA designs.

Thoracic kyphosis increases with age. The resultant increase in compression forces on the anterior vertebral bodies leads to further kyphotic deformity and, an increased likelihood of vertebral collapse. This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of two therapeutic strategies commonly used to treat hyperkyphosis.

69 subjects (26 male: 43 female) were randomised into 4 groups: strengthening, postural re-education (PEd), both and control. The strengthening group attended a gym 3 times a week for 12 weeks to perform seated extension exercises. The PEd group had 3 physiotherapy sessions within a 12 week period in which they received postural assessment and a home exercise programme. The combined group received both interventions while the control group received neither. Outcome measurements were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks. They included static (inclinometer) and 6-hour angular measurements (using flexible electrogoniometer (FEG)) and physical function tests.

There were no significant differences between the marginal means of the angular measurements for any of the intervention groups. However, the group which received both interventions demonstrated reduced kyphosis as measured by the FEG angles (apex of the curve between T3 and T11), while the strengthening group showed reduced inclinometer angles (between T1 and T12). The strengthening group showed improvement in back extensor strength (BES) (0.6 +/− 0.2 N/kg, p < 0.01), time to walk 10 metres (−0.3 +/− 0.6 s, p < 0.05), and time to stand and sit 5 times (−0.9 +/− 0.6 s, p < 0.05). However, there was no relationship between change in BES and change in kyphotic angle. The PEd group showed the greatest improvement in the timed up and go test but this was not significant. Improvement in inclinometer angle over the 12 weeks was associated with degree of kyphosis at baseline (upright inclinometer r = −0.47, p=0.0001) but this relationship was not apparent in the FEG measurements. Both the FEG and inclinometer angles showed a marked decrease in degree of improvement in subjects aged >70.

(50/50). A combination of strengthening and PEd was most effective at reducing hyperkyphosis. BES was improved with resisted strengthening but not with home-based postural exercises. However, increased BES was not associated with decreased kyphosis. Larger baseline kyphosis was associated with greater angular improvement. Subjects aged >70 were less likely to improve.

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is common, yet the impact on function and quality of life has not been measured. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact on function and quality of life, comparing the results to people with severe hip osteoarthritis and an asymptomatic control group.

Forty two people with GTPS – including 11 not actively seeking treatment and 11 seeking surgical treatment, 20 with severe hip osteoarthritis (OA), and 23 age and sex matched asymptomatic participants (ASC) where recruited from public and private hospitals, and the community. Upon confirming meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria participants were interviewed. Exclusion criteria included lumbar nerve root signs; inflammatory, neoplastic and metabolic disorders. Measured used were the Harris hip score (HHS); the Oswestry disability index (ODI); the Australian quality of life instrument (AQoL); the Functional co-morbidity index (FCI); and fulltime work assessments.

No difference was found between the GTPS and the OA group on the HHS, ODI, AQoL or the FCI measures. Both symptomatic groups were significantly more disabled than the ASC group on the HHS and ODI (p<0.001). The GTPS and OA groups had lower AQoL than the ASC group (p<0.001); and higher FCI results than the ASC group (GTPS vs ASC, p=0.005; OA vs ASC, p=0.019). GTPS participants were least likely to be in full time work; full time work participation probability (95% C.I.): GTPS Prob=0.288 (0.160 to 0.463), OA Prob= 0.518 (0.273 to 0.753); ASC group of Prob=0.676 (0.439 to 0.847).

People with GTPS have similar levels of pain, disability and quality of life, but are less likely to be in full time employment than people with severe hip OA which puts them at risk of economic hardship. Research on conservative and surgical treatments should measure pain, disability and work participation.