The accurate positioning of the total knee arthroplasty affects the survival of the implants(1). Alignment of the femoral component in relation to the native knee is best determined using pre- and post-operative 3D-CT reconstruction(2). Currently, the scans are visualised on separate displays. There is a high inter- and intra-observer variability in measurements of implant rotation and translation(3). Correct alignment is required to allow a direct comparison of the pre- and post-operative surfaces. This is prevented by the presence of the prostheses, the bone shape alteration around the implant, associated metal artefacts, and possibly a segmentation noise. Create a novel method to automatically register pre- and post-operative femora for the direct comparison of the implant and the native bone.Background
Aim
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is currently regaining positive attention as a treatment of osteoarthritis in young, active individuals[1]. The procedure is complex and has low tolerance for implant malpositioning [2]. ‘Precision tools', such as imageless navigation and patient specific instruments, have been developed to assist with implant positioning but have not been shown to be fully reliable [3]. The aim of this study is to present and validate the first step of novel quality control tool to verify implant position intra-operatively. We propose that, before reaming of the femoral head, a handheld structured light 3D scanner can be used to assess the orientation and insertion point of femoral guide wire. Guide wires were placed into the heads of 29 solid foam synthetic femora. A specially designed marker (two orthogonal parallelepipeds attached to a shaft) was inserted into the guide wire holes. Each bone (head, neck and marker) was 3D scanned twice (fig 1). The insertion point and guide wire neck angle were calculated from the marker's parameters. Reference data was acquired with an optical tracking system. The measurements calculated with the 3D scans were compared to the reference ones to evaluate the precision. The comparison of the test retest measurements done with the new method are used to evaluate intra-rater variability.Introduction
Methods
