The purposes of this study were to report the accuracy of stem anteversion for Exeter cemented stems with the Mako hip enhanced mode and to compare it to Accolade cementless stems.

We reviewed the data of 25 hips in 20 patients who underwent THA through the posterior approach with Exeter stems and 25 hips in 19 patients with Accolade stems were matched for age, gender, height, weight, disease, and approaches. There was no difference in the target stem anteversion (20°–30°) between the groups. Two weeks after surgery, CT images were taken to measure stem anteversion.

The difference in stem anteversion between the plan and the postoperative CT measurements was 1.2° ± 3.8° (SD) on average with cemented stems and 4.2° ± 4.2° with cementless stems, respectively (P <0.05). The difference in stem anteversion between the intraoperative measurements and the postoperative CT measurements was 0.75° ± 1.8° with Exeter stems and 2.2° ± 2.3° with Accolade stems, respectively (P <0.05).

This study demonstrated a high precision of anteversion for Exeter cemented stems with the Mako enhanced mode and its clinical accuracy was better with the cemented stems than that with the cementless stems. Although intraoperative stem anteversion measurements with the Mako system were more accurate with the cemented stems than that with the cementless stem, the difference was about 1° and the accuracy of intra-operative anteversion measurements was quite high even with the cementless stems. The smaller difference in stem anteversion between the plan and postoperative measurements with the cemented stems suggested that stem anteversion control was easier with cemented stems under the Mako enhanced mode than that with cementless stems.

Intraoperative stem anteversion measurement with Mako total hip enhanced mode was accurate and it was useful in controlling cemented stem anteversion to the target angle.

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of a robotic preparation for acetabular metal augments in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Mako robotic arm reaming was used in 7 DDH to prepare the bony cavities for both Trident PSL cups and Tritanium acetabular wedge augments in six hips with Crowe 2 or 3 DDH. In CT-based planning, a properly sized cup was placed in the original acetabulum, and the same sized cup was also placed to fit the superolateral acetabular defect. The coordinates of the planned positions of cup and augment were recorded to manage the robotic arm reaming. After registration of the patient's pelvis, robotic reaming was performed first for the augment, then, for the cup by changing the target position of reaming as planned. The accuracy of the cup and augment placement was assessed on postoperative CT. To evaluate the feasibility of the robotic procedure, the OR time and blood loss were compared with those of 13 patients who received the same cup and augment systems with a conventional technique. All procedures were done without fracture or fixation failure. There were no differences in OR time or blood loss between the two procedures. Postoperative CT measurements of the distance between the cup center and the augment sphere center showed less than 2mm difference from the Mako preoperative planning.

Although a longer time of follow up evaluation is mandatory, our robotic acetabular augment preparation technique is accurate and feasible.

The purposes of this study were to review retrospectively the 10-year outcome of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) using an active robot system in the femoral canal preparation for an anatomic short stem and navigation in the cup placement through a mini incision posterior approach. We reviewed all patients who underwent THA with this procedure in 53 hips between 2004 and 2007. There were no intraoperative fracture nor navigation- or robotic-related complications. All implant sizes were same as planned ones. All cases were followed up at least two years and all implants showed bone ingrowth stable according to the Engh's criteria. After then, six patients died of unrelated causes. Two patients (three hips) could not come to the 10-year follow-up examination. The remaining 44 hips were followed for 10 to 12 years (11 years on average). There is no dislocation. The average JOA hip score improved from 48 preoperatively to 96 at the final examination. On the postoperative x-ray measurements, the average cup radiographic inclination was 39° and the radiographic anteversion was 14°. There was no stem which showed more than 2° of varus or valgus alignment. There was no case who showed more than 5mm of limb length discrepancy. Postoperative CT images of 38 hips were obtained at 2 weeks. After matching the coordinates of the pelvis and femur with the preoperative planning, we got very small differences in alignment parameters between the measured values and the planed ones. The difference differences between the plan and measured values were −0.1° in cup inclination, −1.4° in cup anteversion, stem 0.5° in coronal alignment, 0.6° in stem sagittal alignment, and −1.6° in stem anteversion, respectively. We conclude that our robotic femoral preparation for a short anatomical stem and navigated cup placement thru a mini-posterior approach was safe and feasible without affecting the accuracy of the procedure. There were no long term adverse effect of the procedure.