header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 23 - 23
1 Mar 2017
Sugano N Nakahara I Hamada H Takao M Sakai T Ohzono K
Full Access

The purposes of this study were to review retrospectively the 25-year survival of cemented and cementless THA for hip dysplasia and to compare the effect of fixation methods on the long-term survival in patients with DDH. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with OA secondary to hip dysplasia treated with a cemented Bioceram hip system between 1981 and 1987, and a cementless cancellous metal Lübeck hip system between 1987 and 1991. The studied subjects were 76 hips of cemented THA (Group-C) and 57 hips of cementless THA (Group-UC). Both hip implants had a 28-mm alumina head on polyethylene articulation. The mean age at operation was 50.5 years (range, 36–60 years) in Group-C and 50.0 years (range, 29–60 years) in Group-UC. The survival at 25 years regarding any revision as the endpoint was 46% in Group-C and 76% in Group-UC. These difference was significant using Log-rank test (P=0.008). The cup survival at 25 years was 47% in Group-C and 83% in Group-UC (P= 0.0003). The stem survivals at 25 years were 95% in Group-C and 92% in Group-UC. (P= 0.416). Cementless THA in patients with DDH showed a higher survival rate at 25 years than cemented THA because of the excellent survival of the acetabular component without cement. We conclude that cementless THA with the cancellous metal Lübeck hip system led to better longevity at 25 years than cemented THA with the Bioceram in patients with OA secondary to DDH.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 14 - 14
1 Oct 2014
Nakamura N Sugano N Sakai T Nakahara I
Full Access

The robotic-assisted system (ROBODOC) is the first active robot that was designed to reduce potential human errors in performing cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). We have reported minimum five years follow-up clinical results. However, to our knowledge, there have been no longer follow-up reports. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the minimum ten years follow-up results of robotic-assisted and hand-rasping stem implantation techniques.

Between 2000 and 2002, we performed 146 THA on 130 patients who were undergoing primary THA. Robot assisted primary THA was performed on 75 hips and a hand-rasping technique was used on 71 hips. Among them, 112 hips (53 hips in the robotic milling group and 59 hips in the hand-rasping group) were followed more than 10 years. Follow-up periods ranged from 120–152 months (average 135). Preoperatively, we plan the position and the size of the stem three-dimensionally for both groups. At the operation, posterolateral approach was used. We evaluated survivorship and compared clinical results.

At the final follow-up, no stem was revised in either group. Plain radiographs showed bone ingrowth fixation for all the stems of both groups. There were no signs of mechanical loosening in any implant. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip scores between the two groups. Ten years postoperatively, it was significantly better in the robotic milling group (98 points and 96 points, respectively) (Mann-Whitney U-test; p<0.05). The main difference was observed in the category of range of motion (19 points and 18 points, respectively) (p=0.01).

In the previous study, we have reported that the JOA hip score was significantly better in the robotic milling group up to three years postoperatively. In the present study, we found that it was still significantly better at ten years postoperatively. In conclusion, robotic milling THA was associated with better clinical scores until ten years postoperatively.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 343 - 343
1 Mar 2013
Sugano N Takao M Sakai T Nishii T Nakahara I Miki H
Full Access

Although there are several reports of excellent long-term survival after cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), cemented acetabular components are prone to become loose when compared with femoral components. On the other hand, the survival of cementless acetabular components has been reported to be equal or better than cemented ones and the use of cementless acetabular components is increasing. However, most of the reports on survival after THA are for patients with primary hip osteoarthritis (OA) and there is no report of 20-year survival of cementless THA for patients with hip dysplasia. It is supposed to be more difficult to fix cementless acetabular components for OA secondary to hip dysplasia than primary OA. The purposes of this study were to review retrospectively the 20-year survival of cemented and cementless THA for hip dysplasia and to compare the effect of fixation methods on the long-term survival for patients with hip dysplasia. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with OA secondary to hip dysplasia treated with a cemented Bioceram hip system between 1981 and 1987, and a cementless cancellous metal Lübeck hip system between 1987 and 1991. We excluded patients aged more than 60 years, males, and Crowe 4 hips. The studied subjects were 70 hips of cemented THA (Group-C) and 57 hips of cementless THA (Group-UC). Both hip implants had a 28-mm alumina head on polyethylene articulation. The mean age at operation was 50.5 years (range, 36–60 years) in Group-C and 50.0 years (range, 29–60 years) in Group-UC. The mean BMI was 23.2 kg/m2 in Group-C (range, 17.3–29.3 kg/m2) and 22.9 kg/m2 in Group-UC (range, 18.8–28.0 kg/m2). There were no significant differences in age and BMI between the two groups. The average follow-up period was 18.0 years in Group-C and 18.4 years in Group-UC. In Group-C, revision was performed in 33 hips due to aseptic cup loosening (30 hips), stem loosening (one hip), and loosening of both components (two hips). In Group-UC, revision was performed in 10 hips due to stem fracture secondary to distal fixation (4 hips), cup loosening (three hips), polyethylene breakage (two hips), and extensive osteolysis around the stem (one hip). The survival at 20 years regarding any revision as the endpoint was 51% in Group-C and 84% in Group-UC. This difference was significant using Log-rank test (P=0.006). The cup survival at 20 years was 54% in Group-C and 92% in Group-UC. This difference was also significant (P = 0.0003). The stem survival at 20 years was 95% in Group-C and 92% in Group-UC. This difference was not significant (P = 0.4826). Cementless THA showed a higher survival rate at 20 years for hip dysplasia than cemented THA because of the excellent survival of the acetabular component without cement. We conclude that cementless THA with the cancellous metal Lübeck hip system led to better longevity at 20 years than cemented THA with the Bioceram for patients with OA secondary to hip dysplasia.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 166 - 166
1 Jun 2012
Nakahara I Bandoh S Takao M Sakai T Nishii T Sugano N
Full Access

Introduction

The initial mechanical stability of cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty is an important factor for stable biological fixation. Conversely, insufficient initial stability can lead to stem subsidence, and excessive subsidence can result in periprosthetic femoral fracture due to hoop stress. The surface roughness of stems with a surface coating theoretically contributes to initial mechanical stability by increasing friction against the bone, however, no reports have shown the effect of surface roughness on stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of differences in surface roughness due to different surface treatments with the same stem design on the initial stability.

Materials and Methods

Proximally titanium plasma-sprayed femoral stems (PS stem) and proximally grit-blasted stems (GB stem) were compared. The stem design was identical with an anatomic short tapered shape for proximal fixation. The optimum size of PS stem based on 3D templating was implanted in one side of 11 pairs of human cadaveric femora and the same size of GB stems was implanted in the other side. After implantation, the specimens were fixed to the jig of a universal testing machine in 25cm of entire length so that the long axis of the femur was positioned at 15-degrees adduction to the vertical. Vertical load tests were conducted under 1 mm/minute of displacement-controlled conditions. After 200 N of preload to eliminate the variance in the magnitude of press-fit by manual implantation, load was applied until periprosthetic fracture occurred.