Total hip replacement (THR) is an option in a subset of patients with a neck of femur (NOF) fracture. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) provide guidance on the use of THR in patients with a NOF fracture. We compare our experience and recommend changes at a local level to allow successful implementation of the guideline to improve patient care.

From July 2008 to July 2011, 36 THRs preformed for trauma were identified retrospectively by cross-referencing several databases (Bluespier, Worcestershire, UK and surveillance of Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Scotland). 7 exclusions (3 failed internal fixation, 1 chronic NOF fracture, and 2 extra-capsular fractures) leaving 29 patients. All operations were carried out under the supervision of a hip surgeon. Outcome data (see results) was collected from electronic sources. Statistical analysis preformed using Fisher's exact test for categorical data.

Median age 62 years (44–88), time to surgery 4 days (2–8), American association of anaesthesia grade 2 (2–4) and hospital stay was 12 days (6–18). The first operator was a consultant in 23 cases and registrar in 6. 9 hips were cemented, 5 uncemented and 15 hybrid. 13 (44.8%) patients had a complication including 8 major (27.6%) complications. A blood transfusion was required in 11 (37.9%) patients. There were 2 (6.9%) deaths. A delay to surgery of more than 2 days was associated with increased risk of major complication (p< 0.03). ASA, Age, Grade of surgeon or Cement not associated with major complications.

Our results are inferior to those in the literature. We have identified potential causes; mainly a delay to surgery increasing risk of major complication. In keeping with the current guidelines we recommend that local pathways are instigated to ensure THRs for trauma may be preformed in a timely fashion.

Current fracture-clinic models, especially in the advent of reductions in junior doctors hours, may limit outpatient trainee education and patient care. We designed a new model of fracture-clinic, involving an initial consultant led case review focused on patient management and trainee education.

Outcomes for all new patients attending the redesigned fracture-clinic over a 3-week period in 2010 were compared with the traditional clinic in the same period in 2009. Health professionals completed a Likert questionnaire assessing their perceptions of education, support, standards of patient care and morale before and after the clinic redesign.

309 and 240 patients attended the clinics in 2009 and 2010 respectively. There was an increase in consultant input into patient management after the redesign (29% versus 84%, p<0.0001), while the proportion of patients requiring physical review by a consultant fell (32% versus 9%). The percentage of new patients discharged by junior medical staff increased (17% versus 25%) with a reciprocal fall in return appointments (55% versus 40%, p<0.0005). Overall, return appointment rates fell significantly (55% versus 40%, p=0.013). Staff perception of education and senior support improved from 2 to 5, morale and overall perception of patient care from 4 to 5.

Our model of fracture-clinic redesign has significantly enhanced consultant input into patient care without additional funding. In addition, we have demonstrated increased service efficiency and significant improvements in staff support, morale and education. In the face of current economic and training challenges, we recommend this new model as a tool for enhancing patient and trainee experiences.

Post-operative regimes involving the use of intra-articular local anaesthetic infiltration may allow early mobilisation in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Few studies have evaluated such regimes outside specialist arthroplasty units. We aimed to determine whether an enhanced recovery programme including the use of local anaesthetic administration could be adapted for use in a district general setting.

Following introduction of this regime to our unit, 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty were reviewed. 56 patients underwent a standard analgesic regime involving a general or spinal anaesthetic and oral analgesics post operatively (group1). 48 patients underwent the newly introduced regime, which included pre-operative counselling, peri-articular local anaesthetic infiltration at operation and intra-articular local anaesthetic top-up administration post-operatively for 24 hours (group 2). Length of stay, post-operative analgesic requirements, and range of knee motion post-operatively were compared.

Median length of stay was less for patients in group 2 compared with those in group 1 (4 days compared to 5 days, p<0.05). Patients in group 2 required lower total doses of opiate analgesia post-operatively. 90% of patients in group 2 were ambulant on the first post operative day, compared with less than 25% of patients in group 1. Mean knee flexion on discharge was greater in patients in group 2 compared with those in group 1 (85 degrees compared with 75 degrees). No infective complications from intra-articular catheter placement were observed. However, technical difficulties were encountered during the introduction period, including loss of catheter placement, leakage of local anaesthetic and adaptation of nursing time for top-up anaesthetic administration.

A rehabilitation regime involving local anaesthetic infiltration for total knee arthroplasty can successfully be adapted for use in a district general setting. Our results suggest if initial technical difficulties are overcome, this regime can provide effective postoperative analgesia, early mobilisation and reduced hospital stay.