The Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) is a valid and reliable tool, designed to measure physical deformity as perceived by patients with idiopathic scoliosis. It is unclear whether the type of treatment in patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis affects the patients' perception of cosmesis gain. We studied 40 patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis treated with posterior spinal fusion with (20) and without thoracoplasty (20) aiming to assess correlation of improvement in radiological parameters to subjective cosmesis gain.

Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis treated with posterior spinal fusion with thoracoplasty (20) and without thoracoplasty (20) filled out Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) forms with their perception of deformity before and after operation at the clinic follow-up. The WRVAS forms include seven aspects of the deformity i.e. spinal deformity, rib prominence, lumbar prominence, thoracic deformity, trunk imbalance, shoulder asymmetry and scapular asymmetry. Each aspect is shown with five figures of increasing severity of the deformity and scored from minimum (1) to maximum (5). Results are presented as the sum of the seven questions. The lowest possible score for the total is 7, while the highest possible total score is 35. The curve magnitude was divided into 5 subgroups as 30 and under, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60 and 70 and over.

Floor and ceiling effects were analysed as percentage of cases with minimum and maximum scores.

Our study confirmed that following posterior scoliosis surgery with and without thoracoplasty, there was significant improvement in perceived appearance. Overall spinal deformity and thoracic deformity correction were comparable in two groups. However, improvement in rib hump prominence, flank prominence, restoration of truncal, shoulder and scapular symmetry were much better rated by the patients with PSF and thoracoplasty group using Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale.

Proponents of thoracoplasty suggest a better correction, obviating iliac crest donor site morbidity, obtaining bone grafts for fusion and better rib hump correction. Opponents suggest increase risk for chest complications, additional operating time and blood loss, and possible longer hospital stay. There are controversies in the literature about thoracoplasty and its effect on lung function changes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect and outcome of thoracoplasty in conjunction with pedicle screw construct in the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on lung functions.

It is a retrospective study of consecutive series of 62 patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgically treated by single surgeon between 2007 and 2008 at a tertiary referral Orthopaedic Spinal unit. Posterior spinal fusion and thoracoplasty (n=32, all but one girls) were compared with 30 without thoracoplasty (all but one girls). Clinical and radiographic analysis was performed, including the SRS-30 questionnaire and Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT). Absolute and percent-predicted values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and total lung capacity (TLC) were evaluated preoperatively and at 3-months, 1 year and/or 2-year follow-up, and comparisons were made between two groups. The minimum follow-up was one year.

No statistical differences were found between the two groups in PFT's both pre-operatively and at latest follow up ranging 1 to 3 years. Our findings suggest that thoracoplasty did not adversely affected long-term PFT's in AIS patients compared to patients treated by posterior spinal fusion alone. Three-month postoperative pulmonary function test values in both groups experienced 15-30% decline which returned to the preoperative baseline at 1 year in > 90% patients. In thoracoplasty group, 5 to 8 ribs were resected and used for bone graft. Chest complications were observed in 2 patients requiring chest drainage. Prolonged donor site morbidity was noted in 3 patients.

Thoracoplasty showed comparable clinical and radiological correction without any significant pulmonary function compromise. Pulmonary function test values returned to the preoperative baseline at 1 year in > 90% patients.