Over 70,000 hip fractures occur annually in the UK. Both SIGN (111) and NICE (124) give guidance on optimal management of these patients. Both suggest cemented hemiarthroplasty should be used in those without contra-indications, as cemented implants are associated with less thigh pain, subsidence and a better functional outcome. Cardiorespiratory compromise secondary to bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS) is however a concern in those with pre-existing cardiorespiratory disease (NYHA grade 3–4, pulmonary hypertension) or pathological fracture [3]. The aim of our study was to audit the practice of a University of Glasgow hospital with regard to cemented hemiarthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed data on all patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture at the Southern General Hospital between 01/01/12-02/04/12. Patient demographics, pre-operative plan, procedure performed, ASA grade and pre-morbid mobility were recorded. Twenty-three hemiarthroplasties were performed. The median age was 82 (70–101). No patient aged over 90 underwent cemented hemiarthroplasty. Cemented implants (JRI, Furlong) were used in 26% (n=6) while 74% (n=17) underwent uncemented (Stryker, Austin-Moore) hemiarthroplasty. ASA grade was recorded in eight (35%). There were four ASA-2 patients (mild systemic disease not limiting activity) of which 75% underwent uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Pre-morbid mobility was recorded in eight (35%). All three independently mobile patients underwent uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Six (26%) had a documented pre-operative plan with regards to cement use. This study highlights the disparity between current recommendations and our Centres’ practice. Most notable were: poor recording of pre-operative mobility, poor documentation of a pre-operative surgical plan, the low use of cemented fixation even in fit mobile patients and the lack of ASA grade recording (stratification of risk) by our anaesthetic colleagues. We suggest a documented pre-operative discussion between the surgeon and anaesthetist to establish BCIS risk and decide on use of cemented arthroplasty taking into account age and mobility.Results
The diagnosis and treatment of hip disease in young adults has rapidly evolved over the past ten years. Despite the advancements of improved diagnostic skills and refinement of surgical techniques, the psychosocial impact hip disease has on the young adult has not yet been elucidated. This observational study aimed to characterise the functional and psychosocial characteristics of a group of patients from our young hip clinic. 49 patients responded to a postal questionnaire which included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Median age was 20 years (range 16-38) with a gender ratio of 2:1 (female: male). The most common diagnoses were Perthes' disease and developmental hip dysplasia. More than half of our patients had moderate to severe pain based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and at least a moderate disability based on the ODI. Thirty-two percent of patients were classified as having borderline to abnormal levels of depression and 49% of patients were classified as having borderline to abnormal levels of anxiety based on the HADS. Comparison of the ODI with the VAS and HADS anxiety and depression subscales showed a significant positive correlation (p<0.05). Multiple regression showed the ODI to be a significant predictor of the HADS anxiety and depression scores (regression coefficient 0.13, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.21, p<0.05). This study highlights the previously unrecognised psychosocial effects of hip disease in the young adult. A questionnaire which includes HADS may be of particular value in screening for depression and anxiety in young people with physical illness. This study also highlights that collaboration with psychologists and other health care providers may be required to achieve a multidisciplinary approach in managing these patients.
