header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 49 - 49
1 Apr 2019
Harman C Afzal I Shardlow D Mullins M Hull J Kashif F Field R
Full Access

INTRODUCTION

Historically, the clinical performance of novel implants was usually reported by designer surgeons who were the first to acquire clinical data. Regional and national registries now provide rapid access to survival data on new implants and drive ODEP ratings. To assess implant performance, clinical and radiological data is required in addition to implant survival. Prospective, multi-surgeon, multi-centre assessments have been advocated as the most meaningful. We report the preliminary results of such a study for the MiniHip™femoral component and Trinity™ acetabular component (Corin Ltd, UK).

METHODS

As part of a non-designer, multi-surgeon, multi-centre prospective surveillance study to assess the MiniHip™stem and Trinity™ cup, 535 operations on 490 patients were undertaken. At surgery, the average age and BMI of the study group was 58.2 years (range 21 to 76 years) and 27.9 (range 16.3 to 43.4) respectively. Clinical (Harris Hip Score, HHS) and radiological review have been obtained at 6 months, 3 and 5 years. Postal Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and EuroQol- 5D (EQ5D) score have been obtained at 6 months and annually thereafter. To date, 23 study subjects have withdrawn or lost contact, 11 have died, and 9 have undergone revision surgery. By the end of March 2018, 6 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 year data had been obtained for 511, 445, 427, 376, 296 and 198 subjects respectively.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 26 - 26
1 Feb 2012
Mullins M Judet T Piriou P
Full Access

Aim

This controlled study uses gait analysis to evaluate patients' pre- and post-ankle arthroplasty, post-ankle arthrodesis and compares the results with a healthy control group to assess whether these theoretical benefits are borne out in clinical practice.

Method

Five patient groups (arthrodesis, arthroses, arthroplasty after 6 and 12 months and control) each consisting of 12 patients were analysed in our gait laboratory and the following parameters obtained at two different walking speeds: velocity, cadence, step length, stride length, the timing of toe off and the duration of stance phase. In addition, the ground reaction force during the whole gait cycle was recorded, as well as the range of movement of the knee and of the foot in relation to the tibia in walking and functional tests.