Several studies have reported that tibial component in varus alignment can worsen the survivorship of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). On the other hand, Varus/valgus inclination of the tibial component can affect the location of the contact point between femoral and tibial component especially in round on flat bearing surface design. Along with the tibial component inclination, changes in the contact point may also alter the tibial condylar bone stress, which would affect the longevity or complications after UKA. We constructed a validated three-dimensional finite element model of the tibia with a medial component and assessed stress concentrations by changing the tibial component coronal inclinations (squale inclination, 3° and 6° varus, 3° and 6° valgus inclination). We evaluated the Von Mises stress on the medial tibial metaphyseal cortex and the proximal resected surface when a load of 900N was applied on the tibial component surface by two conditions in each inclination models; one is that the loading site is fixed at the mediolateral center of the tibial component (fixed model), and the other is that the loading site is variable depending on the tibial component inclination (variable model) (Fig.1).Background
Method
Tibia vara seen in Japanese patients reportedly influences the tibial component alignment when performing TKA. However, it is unclear whether tibia vara affects the component position and size selection. We therefore determined (1) the amount of medial tibial bow, (2) whether the tibia vara influences the aspect ratio of the tibial resected surface in aligning the tibial component with the tibial shaft axis (TSA), and (3) whether currently available tibial components fit the shapes of resected proximal tibias in terms of aspect ratio. The study was performed using CT data from 90 lower limbs in 74 Japanese female patients with primary varus knee OA, scheduled for primary TKAs between January 2010 and March 2012. We measured the tibia vara angle (TVA; the angle between the TSA and the tibial mechanical axis), proximal varus angle (PVA; angle between the TSA and the line connecting the center of the tibial eminence and the center of the proximal 1/3 of the tibia) using three-dimensional preoperative planning software [Fig.1]. Then the mediolateral and middle AP dimensions of the resected surface when the tibial component was set so that its center aligned with the TSA was measured. We determined the correlations of the aspect ratio (the ML dimension divided by the AP dimension) of the resected surface with TVA or PVA and compared the aspect ratios to those of five prosthesis designs.Objective
Material and Methods
