In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic meant that proceeding with elective surgery was restricted to minimise exposure on the wards. In order to maintain throughput of elective cases, our hospital was forced to convert as many cases as possible to same day procedures rather than overnight admission. In this retrospective analysis we review the cases performed as same day arthroplasty surgeries compared to the same period 12 months previous.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasties in a three month period between October and December in 2019 and again in 2020, in the middle of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Patient demographics, number of out-patient primary arthroplasty cases, length of stay for admissions, 30-day readmission and complications were collated.

In total, 428 patient charts were reviewed for the months of October-December of 2019 (n=195) and 2020 (n=233). Of those, total hip arthroplasties comprised 60% and 58.8% for 2019 and 2020, respectively. Demographic data was comparable with no statistical difference for age, gender contralateral joint replacement or BMI. ASA grade I was more highly prevalent in the 2020 cohort (5.1x increase, n=13 vs n=1). Degenerative disc disease and fibromyalgia were less significantly prevalent in the 2020 cohort. There was a significant increase in same day discharges for non-DAA THAs (2x increase) and TKA (10x increase), with a reciprocal decrease in next day discharges. There were significantly fewer reported superficial wound infections in 2020 (5.6% vs 1.7%) and no significant differences in readmissions or emergency department visits (3.1% vs 3.0%).

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic meant that hospitals and patients were hopeful to minimise the exposure to the wards and to not put strain on the already taxed in-patient beds. With few positives during the Coronavirus crisis, the pandemic was the catalyst to speed up the outpatient arthroplasty program that has resulted in our institution being more efficient and with no increase in readmissions or early complications.

Three dimensional printing is an emerging new technology in medicine and the current educational value of 3D printed fracture models is unknown. The delayed surgery and need for CT imaging make calcaneal fractures an ideal scenario for preoperative 3D printed (3Dp) fracture models. The goal of this study is to assess if improvements in fracture understanding and surgical planning can be realized by trainees when they are given standard CT imaging and a 3Dp model compared to standard CT imaging and a virtual 3D rendering (3D CT).

Ethics approval was granted for a selection of calcaneal fracture imaging studies to be collected through a practice audit of a senior orthopaedic trauma surgeon. 3Dp models were created in house. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files of patient CT scans were obtained from local servers in an anonymized fashion. DICOM files were then converted to .STL models using the Mimics inPrint 2.0 (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) software. Models were converted into a .gcode file through a slicer program (Simplify3D, Blue Ash, OH USA). The .gcode files were printed on a TEVO Little Monster Delta FDM printer (TEVO USA, CO USA) using 1.75mm polylactic acid (PLA) filament.

Study participants rotated through 10 workstations viewing CT images and either a digital 3D volume rendering or 3Dp model of the fractured calcaneus. A questionnaire at each workstation assessed fracture classification, proposed method of treatment, confidence with fracture understanding and satisfaction with the accuracy of the 3Dp model or 3D volume rendering. Participants included current orthopaedic surgery trainees and staff surgeons.

A total of 16 residents and five staff completed the study. Ten fracture cases were included in the analysis for time, confidence of fracture understanding, perceived model accuracy and treatment method. Eight fracture cases were included for assessment of diagnosis. There were no cases that obtained universal agreement on either Sanders classification or treatment method from staff participants. Residents in their final year of studies had the quickest mean time of assessment (60 +/− 24 sec.) and highest percentage of correct diagnoses (83%) although these did not reach significance compared to the other residency years. There was a significant increase in confidence of fracture understanding with increasing residency year. Also, confidence was improved in cases where a 3Dp model was available compared to conventional CT alone although this improvement diminished with increasing residency year. Perceived accuracy of the cases with 3Dp models was significantly higher than cases without models (7 vs 5.5 p < 0.0001).

This is the first study to our knowledge to assess trainee confidence as a primary outcome in the assessment of the educational value of 3Dp models. This study was able to show that a 3Dp model aides in the perceived accuracy of fracture assessment and showed an improvement in trainee confidence, although the effect on confidence seems to diminish with increasing residency year. We propose that 3D printed calcaneal fracture models are a beneficial educational tool for junior level trainees and the role of 3Dp models for other complex orthopaedic presentations should be explored.

Advances in orthopaedic surgery have led to minimally invasive techniques to decrease patient morbidity by minimizing surgical exposure, but also limits direct visualization. This has led to the increased use of intraoperative fluoroscopy for fracture management. Unfortunately, these procedures require the operating surgeon to stay in close proximity to the patient, thus being exposed to radiation scatter. The current National Council on Radiation Protection recommends no more than 50 mSv of radiation exposure to avoid ill-effects. Risks associated with radiation exposure include cataracts, skin, breast and thyroid cancer, and leukemia. Despite radiation protection measures, there is overwhelming evidence of radiation-related diseases in orthopaedic surgeons. The risk of developing cancer (e.g. thyroid carcinoma and breast cancer) is approximately eight times higher than in unexposed workers. Despite this knowledge, there is a paucity of evidence on radiation exposure in orthopaedic surgery residents, therefore the goal of this study is to quantify radiation exposure in orthopaedic surgery residents.

We hypothesize that orthopaedic surgery residents are exposed to a significant amount of radiation throughout their training. We specifically aim to: 1) quantify the amount of radiation exposure throughout a Canadian orthopaedic residency training program and 2) determine the variability in resident radiation exposure by rotation assignment and year of training.

This ongoing prospective cohort study includes all local orthopaedic surgery residents who meet eligibility criteria. Inclusion criteria: 1) adult residents in an orthopaedic surgery residency program. Exclusion criteria: 1) female residents who are pregnant, and 2) residents in a non-surgical year (i.e. leave of absence, research, Masters/PhD). After completion of informed consent, each eligible resident will wear a dosimeter to measure radiation exposure in a standardized fashion. Dosimeters will be worn on standardized lanyards underneath lead protection in their left chest pocket during all surgeries that require radiation protection. Control dosimeters will be worn on the outside of each resident's scrub cap for comparison. Dosimeter readings will then be reported on a monthly and rotational basis. All data will be collected on a pre-developed case report form. All data will be de-identified and stored on a secure electronic database (REDCap). In addition to monthly and rotational dosimeter readings, residents will also report sex, height, level of training, parental status, and age for secondary subgroup analyses. Residents will also report if they have personalized lead or other protective equipment, including lead glasses. Resident compliance with dosimeter use will be measured by self report of >80% use on operative days. Interim analysis will be performed at the 6-month time point and data collection will conclude at the 1 year time point.

Data collection began in July 2018 and interim 6-month results will be available for presentation at the CORA annual meeting in June 2019.

This is the first prospective study quantifying radiation exposure in Canadian orthopaedic residents and the results will provide valuable information for all Canadian orthopaedic training programs.