The palpation of the controlateral iliac spinae remains a major hurdle to the success of navigation in lateral position. Several studies are seeking for alternative landmarks to compute the anterior pelvic plane (APP). Up to now, none of those methods have been used in clinical routine. Ultrasound navigation offers a great potential to identify new bony landmarks. The tubercles of the lower lumbar spine and the symphysis can easily be imaged. Those points define a sagittal plane, that can be used as a symmetry plane to compute a virtual controlateral spinae from the acquired colateral spinae. A virtual pelvic plane can then be computed. The objective of this study was to check the accuracy and reproducibility of this virtual anterior pelvic plane. 6 hips (3 left, 3 right) from 4 cadavers (mean BMI 22,6; range 19,5–26,7) embalmed with glycerol and alcohol were used for this study. All anatomic landmarks were acquired with the OrthoPilot® Ultrasound navigation system. One experienced surgeon acquired the reference APP with the cadavers lying supine. The cadavers were then placed in lateral position. Two experienced surgeons acquired 6 times following landmarks: 3 lower lumbar tubercles, 3 sacral tubercles (see Figure 1), the posterior spines, the symphysis and the colateral iliac spine. Several sagittal planes were computed using all points (least square plane) and all possible combinations between one symphysis point, one lower lumbar tubercle point (L5, L4 or L3), and one sacral tubercle point (S2 or S1). The angular error of the resulting virtual APP to the reference APP was computed. For each cadaver, an error map was computed to visualize the error of the virtual APP with respect to the height of the used sacral and lumbar tubercles along the spine. The reference APP was acquired with a good reproducibility: the deviation between each acquisition to the mean of all acquisitions was smaller than 1° (except for cadaver 2 right side, the deviation reached 2 ° in the frontal plane). As some sacral and lumbar points were mixed during the acquisition, the line joining the posterior spines was used to separate the sacral from the lumbar points. The mean errors and standard deviations were comparable between operators. The least square plane computed with all points strongly depended on the cadaver positioning : for the same cadaver, the mean error reached 0°on the left side and 8° on the right side. More constant results were obtained by using a combination of 3 points. 5 outliers were identified and removed as they clearly corresponded to erroneous acquisitions on bad quality images. After having removed those outliers, the mean error ranged between 2° and 5° and the standard deviation between 1° and 3°. The best combination of points was a point on the symphysis, the lowest sacral tubercle (S2) and the lowest lumbar tubercle (L5). This study shows that the symphysis, the lower lumbar and sacral tubercles can be used to define a sagittal plane and thereby define a virtual anterior pelvic plane. Outliers should be suppressed by taking special care to the image quality and by adding a guided ultrasound functionality: visualizing the resulting sagittal plane on the ultrasound picture would enable the surgeon to easily control the accuracy of his acquired plane. The next steps consist in checking the feasibility in a clinical set-up.
To study intra- and inter-observer variability with the use of the ultra-sound transducer and percutaneous digitiser point probes To assess the learning curve with the use of the ultrasound transducer probe As part of a larger cadaver study evaluating navigated total hip replacement via the posterior approach, we assessed data relating to acquisition of bony landmarks of the Anterior Pelvic Plane (APP) by four surgeons with an ultrasound transducer and a percutaneous point probe. The surgeons had differing levels of experience with hip surgery in general, and also with surgical navigation per se, but none of them had previously used the ultrasound probe for the specific purpose of landmark acquisition. Without fixing an absolute positional value for any of the bony landmarks, the points registered for individual landmarks by each surgeon were then studied, looking at the three-dimensional spread of these points relative to each other about the mean value. The data from all four surgeons were analysed, looking at the global dispersion of points acquired by the ultrasound and percutaneous point digitiser probes. Our results show that with the exception of a few isolated outliers, the ultrasound probe generated values fell within a +/− 10 mm range. For all four surgeons, the global spread of ultrasound-registered points was noted to be less than that acquired by percutaneous point probe acquisition. Of interest was the finding that points registered by individual surgeons using the ultrasound probe tended to be grouped distinctly together but spatially separate from those of the other surgeons; it would appear that each operator was “homing” in on what he perceived to be the bony landmark in question on the projected ultrasound image. With the percutaneous pointer probe, and with the anterior superior iliac spines as the target, there was closer grouping of points around the mean positional value for the two surgeons who were experienced with its use. However, at the symphysis pubis, the spread of points for these surgeons were not much different from the other two less experienced one, with these points showing a global spread as great as 25 mm. Regardless of the experience of the surgeon, the use of the ultrasound transducer probe appears to be more accurate than percutaneous pointer probe for acquisition of the bony landmarks that constitute the anterior pelvic plane. The learning curve associated with its use is seemingly short and steep. Its accuracy is limited by the fact that the identification of the bony land marks on the on-screen display is open to interpretation by the individual. Methods to standardise the identification of these landmarks on ultrasound images may help improve its accuracy in the future.
