A painful “dreaded black line” (DBL) has been associated with progression to complete fractures in atypical femur fractures (AFF). Adjacent sclerosis, an unrecognized radiological finding, has been observed in relation to the DBL. We document its incidence, associated features, demographics and clinical progression.

We reviewed plain radiographs of 109 incomplete AFFs between November 2006 and June 2021 for the presence of sclerosis adjacent to a DBL. Radiographs were reviewed for location of lesions, and presence of focal endosteal or periosteal thickening. We collected demographical data, type and duration of bisphosphonate therapy, and progression to fracture or need for prophylactic stabilization, with a 100% follow up of 72 months (8 – 184 months).

109 femurs in 86 patients were reviewed. Seventeen sclerotic DBLs were observed in 14 patients (3 bilateral), involving 15.6% of all femora and 29.8% of femora with DBLs. Location was mainly subtrochanteric (41.2%), proximal diaphyseal (35.3%) and mid-diaphyseal (23.5%), and were associated with endosteal or periosteal thickening. All patients were female, mostly Chinese (92.9%), with a mean age of 69 years. 12 patients (85.7%) had a history of alendronate therapy, and the remaining 2 patients had zoledronate and denosumab therapy respectively. Mean duration of bisphosphonate therapy was 62 months. 4 femora (23.5%) progressed to complete fractures that were surgically managed, whilst 6 femora (35.3%) required prophylactic fixation.

Peri-lesional sclerosis in DBL is a new radiological finding in AFFs, predominantly found in the proximal half of the femur, at times bilateral, and are always associated with endosteal or periosteal thickening. As a high proportion of patients required surgical intervention, these lesions could suggest non-union of AFFs, similar to the sclerotic margins commonly seen in fractures with non-union. The recognition of and further research into this new feature could shed more light on the pathophysiological progression of AFFs.

Introduction: The preferred treatment for displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children is closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Cross-wiring techniques are biomechanically superior to parallel lateral wiring techniques. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with a novel cross wiring technique performed entirely from the lateral side. This avoids the potential for ulnar nerve injury in these difficult cases.

Patients and Methods: We collected all children with supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus who were manipulated and wired by one surgeon, using a lateral cross wiring technique. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture classification (Gartland’s classification) and associated neurovascular injuries were noted. At follow-up (12 weeks), range of motion and carrying angle were measured.

Results: Twenty patients were identified and reviewed. There were 8 female and 14 male patients, mean age 10 years (range 2–11). Two fractures were Type II, 12 were Type IIIA and 6 were Type IIIB. Three patients had signs of an anterior interosseous nerve injury and one patient had a brachial artery laceration.

All fractures were reduced, cross-wired from the lateral side, and rested in an above elbow slab. Wires were removed at 4 weeks.

At follow-up, all children had a full range of motion and the mean carrying angle was 17° (range: 15–20). All three patients with pre-operative nerve injuries had full recovery of nerve function.

Conclusions: Lateral cross wiring of supracondylar fractures represents a real option in the treatment of these injuries. It offers the biomechanical advantages of traditional cross-wiring without the risk of nerve injury.