Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a well-established spinal operation for cervical disc degeneration disease with neurological compromise. The procedure involves an anterior approach to the cervical spine with discectomy to relieve the pressure on the impinged spinal cord to slow disease progression. The prosthetic cage replaces the disc and can be inserted stand-alone or with an anterior plate that provides additional stability. The literature demonstrates that the cage-alone (CA) is given preference over the cage-plate (CP) technique due to better clinical outcomes, reduced operation time and resultant morbidity. This retrospective case-controlled study compared CA versus CP fixation used in single and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for myelopathy in a tertiary centre in Wales.

A retrospective clinico-radiological analysis was undertaken, following ACDF procedures over seven years in a single tertiary centre. Inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years of age with cervical myelopathy who had at least six-month follow-up data. SPSS was used to identify any statistically significant difference between both groups. The data were analysed to evaluate the consistency of our findings in comparison to published literature.

Eighty-six patients formed the study cohort; 28 [33%] underwent ACDF with CA and 58 [67%] with CP. The patient demographics were similar in both groups, and fusion was observed in all individuals. There was no statistical difference between the two constructs when assessing subsidence, clinical complication (dysphagia, dysphonia, infection), radiological parameters and reoperations. However, a more significant percentage [43% v 61%] of patients improved their cervical lordosis angle with CP treatment. Furthermore, the study yielded that surgery to upper cervical levels results in a higher incidence of dysphagia [65% v 35%]. Finally, bony growth across the cage was observed on X-ray in 12[43%] patients, a unique finding not mentioned in the literature previously.

Our study demonstrates no overall difference between the two groups, and we recommend careful consideration of individual patient factors when deciding what construct to choose.

Abstract

Aims

With resumption of elective spine surgery services in the UK following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a multicentre British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) collaborative study to examine the complications and deaths due to COVID-19 at the recovery phase of the pandemic. The aim was to analyze the safety of elective spinal surgery during the pandemic.

Structural bulk autografts restore the severe bone loss at primary hip arthroplasty in dysplastic hips and have shown to have good long term outcomes. There are only a few reports of revision arthroplasty for these sockets that fail eventually. We report on a series of such primary hips which underwent cemented revision of the socket for aseptic loosening and their outcomes.

A retrospective review was performed from our database to identify fifteen acetabular revisions after previous bulk autograft. The mean age at revision was 53.9 years (range 31–72.1). The mean duration between the primary and revision arthroplasty was 12.4 years (range 6.6 – 20.3). All procedures were done using trochanteric osteotomy and three hips also needed the femoral component revision. All fifteen hips needed re-bone grafting at the revision surgery to restore the new socket to the level of the true acetabulum. Of these ten hips had morsellised impaction allograft, and the remaining five also needing a structural bulk allograft.

Two sockets underwent re-revision at mean 7.5 years for aseptic loosening. One patient had a dislocation that was reduced closed. At a mean follow up of 5.7 years, one socket showed superior migration, but was stable and did not need further intervention. Two other sockets also showed radiological evidence of loosening, and are being closely monitored.

The medium term results of cemented acetabular revision in this younger age group are satisfactory, with repeat bone grafting being required to restore the true acetabular position. Though the primary arthroplasty with bulk bone graft recreates the acetabular bone stock, significant bone loss due to the mechanical loosening of the socket needs to be anticipated in revision surgery.

We reviewed our results and complications of using a pre-bent 1.6mm Kirschner wire (K-wire) for extra-articular metacarpal fractures. The surgical procedure was indicated for angulation at the fracture site in a true lateral radiograph of at least 30 degrees and/or in the presence of a rotatory deformity.

A single K-wire is pre-bent in a lazy-S fashion with a sharp bend at approximately 5 millimetres and a longer smooth curve bent in the opposite direction. An initial entry point is made at the base of the metacarpal using a 2.5mm drill by hand. The K-wire is inserted blunt end first in an antegrade manner and the fracture reduced as the wire is passed across the fracture site. With the wire acting as three-point fixation, early mobilisation is commenced at the metacarpo-phalangeal joint in a Futuro hand splint.

The wire is usually removed with pliers post-operatively at four weeks in the fracture clinic.

We studied internal fixation of 18 little finger and 2 ring finger metacarpal fractures from November 2007 to August 2009. The average age of the cohort was 25 years with 3 women and 17 men. The predominant mechanism was a punch injury with 5 diaphyseal and 15 metacarpal neck fractures. The time to surgical intervention was a mean 13 days (range 4 to 28 days). All fractures proceeded to bony union. The wire was extracted at an average of 4.4 weeks (range three to six weeks). At an average follow up of 8 weeks, one fracture had to be revised for failed fixation and three superficial wound infections needed antibiotic treatment.

With this simple and minimally invasive technique performed as day-case surgery, all patients were able to start mobilisation immediately.

The general outcome was good hand function with few complications.

Back pain affects 70% of the population in developed countries and accounts for 13% of sickness absence in the United Kingdom¹. The clinical presentation might be taken less seriously and could result in significant morbidity and mortality. We did a retrospective observational study of patients admitted on an “acute” basis in our unit. Our aim was to identify the epidemiological proportion of patients who had significant life changing spinal conditions.

239 patients were admitted between January 2004 to December 2008 who presented with non traumatic back pain and related symptoms. The group of patients who had osteoporotic compression fractures were excluded. The mean age was 53.6 and patients were predominantly females. Disc protrusions and degenerative conditions accounted for majority of the patients. Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) and Cord compressions together contributed to 7.9% and 8.7% respectively. The mean length of stay was 10.4 days and the average wait for MRI scan was 2.4 days.

Among the patients who present with back pain in the primary care setting, 3% have disc protrusions and 1% neoplastic lesions¹. But the epidemiological distribution among the back pain admissions in the hospital setting is not very clear. Medico legal costs especially with CES are quite substantial² and hence it would be useful to know the volume of patients with potential disabling lesions.

Our study reveals that a significant proportion of patients who had to be admitted with back pain and especially those having red flag signs have serious spinal pathologies. Early diagnosis and timely intervention could prevent unwarranted morbidity and mortality.

We report the our experience of using the Sheffield intra-medullary telescoping nail system for managing recurrent fractures and deformity problems in the long bones of the lower limbs. 15 children with conditions like osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrous dysplasia and neurofibromatosis were operated from the years 1993 to 2001 and followed up for a mean period of five years nine months. The average age at the time of the initial nailing was six years. In all, 21 femurs and 10 tibiae were nailed.

A total of thirteen complications were noted in seven patients, including re-fractures with the nail-in-situ in seven bones, migration of the rods in four bones, fracture of the nail and one sub-clinical infection after femur nailing. Nine revision operations were necessary to address these problems including removal of the infected nail. All these revisions were successful. The estimated 5 year cumulative survival rate was 73% for femur and 75% for tibia. We have not experienced any evidence of epiphyseal damage after the procedure. All our patients can ambulate independently now.

Elongating intramedullary rods are ideal in children with any condition that can cause recurrent fractures or limb deformity as they improve walking capability and prevent further deformity.

The results of a multi-surgeon, multi-implant series of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty performed over a ten year period are presented. All patellofemoral joint arthroplasty performed from the years 1996 to 2006 were retrospectively reviewed using case notes, radiographs and clinic appointments until their latest follow-up period.

101 arthroplasties in 91 patients were followed up for average period of 48 months (range 6–96 months). The average age was 57 years with female patients thrice as common as male patients. There were 5 (5%) complications with 1 deep infection and 4 stiff knees. 35 subsequent procedures were performed in 28 patients including arthroscopic debridement in 18, arthroscopic lateral retinacular release in 8, tibial tuberosity transfer in 3, manipulation for stiffness in 2, and revision to total knee arthroplasty in 4 patients (3 for progression of tib-iofemoral osteoarthritis and 1 for infection).

The necessity of further surgeries in one third of the study group suggests that close follow-up of these patients is needed to address any concerns that can be easily resolved.

Purpose: Isolated patellofemoral joint (PFJ) osteoarthritis has long been a common observation as an important source of knee pain. Once non-operative treatment modalities have been exhausted, the surgical options available are transposition/elevation of tibial tubercle, drilling, realignment procedures, patellectomy, patellar resurfacing, patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Among these, PFA is an established treatment of isolated PFJ osteoarthritis. We present our multi-surgeon, multi-implant series of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty performed over a 10 year period.

Method: This study was a retrospective review of all PFA performed in the Knee Arthroplasty Unit at our hospital over a ten year period from 1997 to 2006. The unit comprises seven specialist surgeons, each with considerable experience in knee arthroplasty and numerous trainee surgeons. One hundred and one PFA performed in 91 patients were identified from the theatre records. Three different implant models were used: the Lubinus implant (Waldemar Link), the FPV system (Wright Medical) and the Avon system (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics).

Results: 101 arthroplasties in 91 patients were followed up for average period of 48.8 months (6–96 months). Of these, none were lost to follow up. The average age was 57 years with female patients thrice as common as male patients. Concomitant procedures in the form of 23 lateral retinacular release or 6 osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS) were performed. There were 6 complications with 2 infections and 4 stiff knees. 31 arthroplasties had subsequent procedures including arthroscopic debridement (18), arthroscopic lateral retinacular release (8), tibial tuberosity transfer (3) and manipulation for stiffness (2). A total of 4 arthroplasties underwent revision to total knee arthroplasty, 2 for infection and 2 for progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis.

Conclusion: The necessity of revision surgeries in one third of the cases suggests that close follow-up of the patients is needed to address any concerns that can be easily resolved. A majority of the patients in our study had very good outcomes and did not need subsequent procedures in the medium term. Our study reiterates the importance of proper patient selection, surgeon experience and correct surgical technique in successful outcomes from PFA.

Introduction: We have come across a subset of patients with advanced patellofemoral osteoarthritis who also had well defined full thickness cartilage loss lesions on the weight bearing femoral condyle. In these patients the findings or the symptoms are not severe enough to warrant a total knee replacement. In this select group of patients, a combination of patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) and Osteochondral Autograft Transfer System (OATS) can be performed to address this unique problem.

Method& Results: Out of 38 PFA procedures performed by the senior author, a concomitant OATS was performed in 6 knees in 5 patients. A retrospective analysis of these patients was carried out with the average follow up being 3.8 years (18 months to 84 months). The average age of the patients in our case study was 48.2 years (36 to 59 years) at the time of surgery. Four of the six knees are doing well in the medium term. One patient had progression of tibiofemoral arthritis and underwent a total knee replacement. The only poor result was a young male, who two years following the PFA, developed a deep infection of the knee. Except for this patient awaiting a second stage revision for an infected knee, all the others have achieved their desired level of activity.

Conclusion: The advantage of this combination is that, the donor tubes for the OATS can be harvested from the trochlea or just adjacent to it, which happens to be the bed for the trochlear implant. This area provides good quality thick donor articular cartilage. As the surgical exposure has already been done for the PFA, the operative time is extended by approximately ten minutes for the OATS procedure. This combination procedure offers an alternative to more invasive options such as total knee replacement in younger patients in whom it is preferable to delay such major surgery.

Introduction: Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is an established treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. We present our multi-surgeon, multi-implant series of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty performed over a ten year period.

Material & Results: his study was a retrospective review of all PFA performed in our unit over a ten year period from 1997 to 2006. The unit comprises seven specialist knee surgeons and numerous trainee surgeons. A total of 46 knees had the Lubinus implant (Waldemar Link), 30 knees had the FPV system (Wright Medical) and 25 knees had the Avon system (Stryker Howmedica).

101 arthroplasties in 91 patients were followed up for average period of 48.8 months (6–96 months). The average age was 57 years with female patients thrice as common as male patients. Concomitant procedures in the form of 23 lateral retinacular release or 6 osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS) were performed. There were 6 complications with 2 infections and 4 stiff knees. Subsequent procedures included arthroscopic debridement (18), arthroscopic lateral retinacular release (8), tibial tuberosity transfer (3) and manipulation for stiffness (2). A total of 4 arthroplasties underwent revision to TKA, 2 for infection and 2 for progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis.

Conclusion: Thorough clinical history, physical examination and radiological investigation are essential before embarking on PFJ replacement. Other concomitant procedures like joint debridement, menisectomy or lateral retinacular release may be necessary to obtain optimum results. The necessity of revision surgeries in 31% of the cases of our study suggests that close follow-up of the patients is needed to address any concerns which can be easily resolved. PFJ replacement effectively addresses anterior knee pain, preserves the joint integrity, involves lesser surgical dissection and has good results of revision to TKA.

Objectives: Injury is a major cause of morbidity in children, but can be prevented if at-risk groups are identified and proper precautions taken. Our study aims to identify the patterns of paediatric fractures in terms of at-risk bone, age, type of fracture, seasonal variations and attempts to look at the role of prevention.

Methods: Retrospective study of the children with fractures presented to A& E and admitted to the paediatric ward at the University Hospital of Hartlepool during August 2004 to August 2005. As used elsewhere we categorised data into injury types.

Results: From the total of 1067 children reviewed,564 were boys and 503, girls. Age incidence-highest in the group of 10–14 years (462), with highest presentation in April, May, June months. Of all orthopaedic injuries, 918 were closed fractures, 38 – open fractures, 40 – dislocations, 71- joint injuries. Upper limb (797) were much common than lower limb fractures (270), with wrist being the commonest site (209). Amongst the 198 admissions, 153 had upper limb and 45 lower limb fractures, with forearm being commonest (117) of whom 51 required surgery. In-patient bed-days occupied were 336.

Discussion: Information about the patterns of injuries in children is important in planning injury prevention. Incidence of paediatric injuries can be reduced with public education, implementation of safety strategies and government legislation. Orthopaedists can be instrumental in reducing incidence of paediatric injuries by participating in patient education, research, and programs that promote safe play.