Mechanical overloading of the knee can occur during activities of daily living such as stair climbing, jogging, etc. In this finite element study we aim to investigate which parameters could detrimentally influence peri-implant bone in the tibial reconstructed knee. Bone quality and patient variables are potential factors influencing knee overloading (Zimmerman 2016). Finite element (FE) models of post-mortem retrieved tibial specimens (n=7) from a previous study (Zimmerman 2016) were created using image segmentation (Mimics Materialise v14) of CT scan data (0.6 mm voxel resolution). Tibial tray and polyethylene inserts were recreated from CT data and measurements of the specimens (Solidworks 2015). Specimens with varying implant geometry (keel/pegged) were chosen for this study. A cohesive layer between bone and cement was included to simulate the behavior of the bone–cement interface using experimentally obtained values. The FE models predict plasticity of bone according to Keyak (2005). Models were loaded to 10 body weight (BW) and then reduced to 1 BW to mimic experimental measurements. Axial FE bone strains at 1 BW were compared with experimental Digital Image Correlation (DIC) bone strains on cut sections of the specimens. After validation of the FE models using strain data, models were rotated and translated to the coordinate system defined in Bergmann (2014). Four loading cases were chosen – walking, descending stairs, sitting down and jogging. Element strains were written to file for post-processing. The bone in all FE models was divided into regions of equal thickness (10 mm) for comparison of strains.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Clinical densitometry studies indicate that following TKR implantation there is loss of bone mineral density in regions around the implant. Bone density below the tibial tray has been reported to decrease 36% at eight years after TKR. This bone loss (∼5%/year) is substantially greater than osteoporosis patients in the same age group (∼1–2%/year) and could contribute the loss of mechanical support provided by the peri-implant leading to loosening of components in the long term. High patient mass and body mass index have also been implicated in increased loosening rates, and was thought to be due to high stress or strain on the tibial constructs. These findings suggest that peri-implant bone strain may be affected by time in service and patient factors such as body mass. The goal of this project was to assess the proximal tibial bone strain with biomechanical loading using Twenty-one human knees with cemented total knee replacements were obtained from the SUNY Upstate Medical University Anatomical Gift Program. Clinical bone density scans were obtained of the proximal tibia in the anterior-posterior direction. Axial loads (1 body weight, 60/40% medial to lateral) were applied to the tibia through the contact patches identified on the polyethylene inserts. Strain measures were made using a non-contacting 3-D digital image correlation (DIC) system. Strain was measured over six regions of the bone surface (anterior (A), posterior (P), medial (M), lateral (L), postero-medial (PM), postero-lateral (PL)) (Figure 1).INTRODUCTION:
METHODS:
Aseptic loosening continues to be a short and long-term complication for patients with cemented knee replacements. Changes in cemented total knee replacement (TKR) fixation have been limited to assessment of radiographic changes at the implant-bone interface and quantification of component migration. The goal of this study was to determine the interlock morphology between cement and trabecular bone using Twelve retrieved tibial components and two lab-prepared constructs with time in service from 0 to 20 years were sectioned in the transverse plane in 10 mm increments, imaged at high resolution, and the current contact fraction (INTRODUCTION:
METHODS:
