header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 371 - 371
1 Dec 2013
Wright S Boymans TA Miles T Grimm B Kessler O
Full Access

Introduction

The human body is a complex and continually adapting organism. It is theorised that the morphology of the proximal femur is closely related to that of the distal femur. Patients that have abnormal anatomy in the proximal femur, such as a high femoral neck anteversion angle, may have abnormal anatomy in the distal femur to overcome proximal differences. This phenomenon is of key interest when performing Total Hip Replacement (THR) or Total Knee Replacement (TKR) surgery. The current design and placement of existing hip and knee implants does not account for any correlation between the anatomical parameters of the proximal and distal femur, where bone anatomy may have adapted to compromise for abnormalities.

A preliminary study of 21 patients has been carried out to assess the relationship between the proximal and distal femur. The difficulties in defining and measuring key anatomical parameters on the femur have been widely discussed in the literature [1] due to its complex three dimensional geometry. Using CT scans of healthy octogenarians, it was possible to mark key anatomical landmarks which could be used to define various anatomical axes throughout the femur. Correlation analyses could then be carried out on these parameters to assess the relationship between proximal and distal femur morphology.

Methods

Each femur was initially realigned along the mechanical axis (MA); defined by joining the centre of the femoral head (FHC) to the centre of the intercondylar notch (INC) [2]. All anatomical landmarks were then identified using the Materialise Mimics v12 software (Figure 1 and 2) and exported into Microsoft Excel for analysis. Key anatomical parameters which were derived from these landmarks included the femoral neck axis (FNA), femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA) [1–4], condylar twist angle, clinical transepicondylar axis (TEA), trochlea sulcus angle and medial and lateral trochlea twist.

A correlation analysis was carried out on SPSS Statistics v20 (IBM) to assess the relationship between proximal and distal anatomical parameters.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 81 - 81
1 Jan 2013
Evans J Giddins G Miles T
Full Access

Aim

The purpose of this study was to develop and test the utility of a hybrid barbed-suture in the core repair of digital flexor tendon injuries. Despite offering advantages over traditional suture methods, concerns over the cost, strength to failure and biocompatibility of barbed sutures have hindered their development. Moreover the recent designs have been very complex. We have attempted to develop and test a simple barbed suture, to assess it's viability in flexor tendon repair and in particular to establish a baseline for the efficacy and modes of failure barbed sutures, in order to help provide a basis for future research.

Method

The barbed suture device was constructed by inserting 3 steel barbs into the weaved construct of a braided polyester suture. The barbed sutures were inserted into 28 porcine lateral extensor tendons yielding a single sided core repair. Tensile testing of the repair was undertaken using a tabletop load frame with the distal end of the tendon fixed in a cryo clamp.

Linear load testing to failure was undertaken. Maximum load, repair excursion and repair stiffness were recorded.