Mega-endoprosthesis over the last two decades have played a significant role in management of non-neoplastic cases for limb salvage for a variety of indications involving bone loss, infection, fracture and failed revision surgery. This is a retrospective case control study comparing outcomes of Mega-Endoprosthesis (MEP) in non-neoplastic cases with periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), with previous history of PJI and aseptic revision. Failure was defined as persistence/recurrence of infection, all cause revision, and antibiotic suppression during the follow up period. Secondary aims were identification of causative organisms, resistance profile and causative factors for revision surgery. A total of 122 patients undergoing 133 MEPs were identified between January 2012 and December 2020. 60 procedures were categorised as group 1 (infection; 50%), 20 as group 2 (previous history of infection; 16.7%), and 53 controls (no infection; 44.2%). Mean age of the cohort was 70.97 years (37.16–94.17), with a mean follow-up of 44.5 months (0.2–179) including patients lost to follow up.Aim
Method
Tuberosity healing in hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures remains problematic. Improved implant design and better techniques for tuberosity fixation have not been met with improved clinical results. The etiology for tuberosity failure is multifactorial; however thermal injury to host bone is a known effect of using polymethylmethacrylate for implant fixation. We hypothesized that the effect of thermal injury at the tuberosity shaft junction could be diminished by utilizing an impaction grafting technique for hemiarthroplasty stems. Five matched pairs of cadaveric humeri were skeletonized and hemiarthroplasty stems were implanted in the proximal humeri in two groups. The first group had full cementation utilized from the surgical neck to 2 cm distal to the stem (cement group) and the second group had distal cementation with autologous cancellous bone graft impacted in the proximal 2.5 cm of the stem (impaction grafting group). Thermocouples were used to measure the inner cortical temperature at the tip of the stem, surgical neck, and at the level of the cement-graft interface for both treatment groups (see Fig. 1). Experiments were initiated with the humeri fully submerged in 0.9% sodium chloride and all three thermocouples registering a temperature of 37 ± 1°C. Statistical analyses were performed with a one-sided, paired t-test.Purpose:
Methods:
The aim of this study was to see if the evaluation of the initial postoperative radiograph following primary knee and hip arthroplasty correlated with clinical outcome at five years postoperatively. Using our institution database we identified forty-nine hip replacements and fifty-two knee replacements performed between 2000 and 2006. All the patients underwent postoperative radiographs one day after surgery and clinical evaluation up to at least five years postoperatively. A consultant radiologist evaluated the radiographs for alignment and component position. The hip arthroplasty patients were assessed clinically using the Harris hip score, Oxford hip score, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC). The knee arthroplasty patients were assessed using the Knee Society score, Oxford knee score, and the WOMAC score.Introduction
Methodology
The Enhanced Recovery Programme (ERP) is an evidence based initiative aimed at speeding up patient recovery after major surgery and improving their outcomes. The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore (RNOH) is a specialist orthopaedic and implemented an ERP for primary knee arthroplasties from October 2010. To analyse the initial results of patients participating in our ERP for primary knee arthroplasty to identify what factors predict their Length of Stay (LoS) and establish where changes can be made to improve outcomes further.Background
Aims
Infection after knee arthroplasty is a devastating complication. Our aim is to present our outcomes of treating infected knee replacements at a tertiary referral centre. We performed a consecutive, retrospective case series of all revision knee arthroplasty for infection between January 2006 and December 2008. Case notes were reviewed and data collated on the date and institution of primary arthroplasty, procedures undertaken at our institution, microbiology and bone loss post first stage, serological markers (C-reactive protein, ESR) prior to second stage and outcome. During this three year period we performed 430 knee revision operations. 51 were in the presence of deep chronic infection. 90% were referred from other hospitals. Overall infection was successfully eradicated in 69%. Nineteen patients underwent repeat two-stage and overall eleven (58%) patients had successful eradication of infection with multiple two-stages. Of these 47% had F3/T3, the highest grading of Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone loss indicating no metaphyseal bone. A further 12% had bicondylar deficiency on the tibia and no femoral metaphyseal bone (F3/T2b). Multidrug resistance present in 69% and 47% were infected with multiple organisms. All members of the unsuccessful outcome group had at least one multidrug resistant organism compared to 43% in the successful cohort (P=0.0002). Multiple organisms are associated with an unsuccessful outcome (P=0.056). Serological markers were not significantly different between the successful and unsuccessful outcome groups. Where the referring hospital had attempted revision and failed, the chance of eradicating infection dropped from 75% to 58% and the rate of above knee amputation was twelve times higher (3% vs. 36%). Custom constrained, rotating hinge prostheses enable aggressive soft tissue debridement including ligaments. Successful two-stage requires a multidisciplinary approach including tissue viability nurses, microbiologists and plastic surgeons. Where units lack revision expertise this series suggests early referral increases the chance of limb salvage.
Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (BPOP), or Nora's lesion, is a rare condition characterised by the formation of surface-based osteocartilaginous lesions typically affecting the hands and feet. 22 cases were identified from the records of a regional bone tumour unit, dating from 1985 to 2009. Of 22 cases, 9 lesions involved the long bones of the hand, 7 the long bones of the feet, 1 case originated from a sesamoid bone of the foot and 5 from long bones (radius, ulna, femur [2] and tibia). Age ranged from 6 to 66 (mean: 31.8) and male to female ratio was 1.8:1. Diagnosis was based on combined radiological and histological features, and initial surgical treatment was excision in 21 cases, and 1 amputation. Follow-up ranged from 12–162 months (mean 32). Recurrence occurred in 6 patients (27%), with mean time to recurrence 49 months (range 10–120). 2 of 8 patients with complete resection margins developed recurrence (25%), versus 4 of 14 with marginal or incomplete resection (28%). Given the potential surgical morbidity inherent in resection, our data suggest that there may be a role for a relatively tissue-conserving approach to the excision of these lesions.
It is known that excessive varus alignment of the femoral stem in total hip replacement (THR) creates a sub-optimal biomechanical environment which is associated with increased rates of revision surgery and component wear. Little is known regarding the effect of femoral stem alignment on patient functional outcome. A retrospective study of patients undergoing primary THR at the RNOH. Alignment of the femoral stem component in-situ was measured subjectively by a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist in both coronal and sagittal planes using post-operative anterior-posterior and lateral pelvic radiographs. Each THR was grouped into valgus, minor-valgus, neutral, minor-varus or varus coronal plane alignment and posterior, minor-posterior, neutral, minor-anterior or anterior sagittal plane alignment. Patient reported functional outcome was assessed by Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and WOMAC questionnaires after a minimum follow-up of 11 months. Maximum range of passive hip flexion, abduction, adduction, external and internal rotation were measured in clinic. A factorial linear regression model was used to analyse data.Background
Methods
Revision total hip arthroplasty is a common operation. The MP Link (Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany) system is a distally loading, modular, tapered femoral stem component for revision hip surgery. MP Link in revision total hip arthoplasty was investigated clinically, radiologically and with Oxford hip scores. A prospective study was conducted of 43 patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty with MP Link prostheses between 2004 and 2010. The patients were operated upon by one of the senior authors (JM, JS, RC). Outcome data was collected in clinic and via patient questionnaires.Aims
Methods
Patients with osteochondrodysplasia frequently require Total Hip Arthroplasty at a younger age, as a result of early degenerative disease of the hip joint. The outcome of Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty in this group of patients has been reported previously. In this retrospective study we evaluated the outcome of custom made (CADCAM) Total Hip Arthroplasty in patients with osteochondrodysplasia. Between 1974 and 2009, twenty one CADCAM Total Hip Arthroplasty procedures were performed in fourteen patients in our institution. There were eight female and six male patients, with the mean age at time of surgery of 40.95 years (20 to 78). The patients were followed up clinically and with the Harris hip score for a mean of 7.12 years (0.5 to 17 years). Four of the twenty-one hips (23.8%) required revision surgery at a mean of 11.54 years (6.5 to 17 years); one required it for aseptic loosening of the femoral component; one required complete revision of the acetabular component; one required exchange of acetabular liner; and one was for symptomatic non-union of a lesser trochanter avulsion. This study shows encouraging clinical outcomes of custom made (CADCAM) Total Hip Arthroplasty in patients with osteochondrodysplasia,
Non-invasive expandable prostheses for limb salvage tumour surgery were first used in 2002. These implants allow ongoing lengthening of the operated limb to maintain limb-length equality and function while avoiding unnecessary repeat surgeries and the phenomenon of anniversary operations. A large series of skeletally immature patients have been treated with these implants at the two leading orthopaedic oncology centres in England (Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, and Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham). An up to date review of these patients has been made, documenting the relevant diagnoses, sites of tumour and types of implant used. 87 patients were assessed, with an age range of 5 to 17 years and follow up range of up to 88 months. Primary diagnosis was osteosarcoma, followed by Ewing's sarcoma. We implanted distal femoral, proximal femoral, total femoral and proximal tibial prostheses. All implants involving the knee joint used a rotating hinge knee. 6 implants reached maximum length and were revised. 8 implants had issues with lengthening but only 4 of these were identified as being due to failure of the lengthening mechanism and were revised successfully. Deep infection was limited to 5% of patients. Overall satisfaction was high with the patients avoiding operative lengthening and tolerating the non-invasive lengthenings well. Combined with satisfactory survivorship and functional outcome, we commend its use in the immature population of long bone tumour cases.
Polymethyl methacrylate spacers are commonly used during staged revision knee arthroplasty for infection. In cases with extensive bone loss and ligament instability, such spacers may not preserve limb length, joint stability and motion. We report a retrospective case series of 19 consecutive patients using a custom-made cobalt chrome hinged spacer with antibiotic-loaded cement. The “SMILES spacer” was used at first-stage revision knee arthroplasty for chronic infection associated with a significant bone loss due to failed revision total knee replacement in 11 patients (58%), tumour endoprosthesis in four patients (21%), primary knee replacement in two patients (11%) and infected metalwork following fracture or osteotomy in a further two patients (11%). Mean follow-up was 38 months (range 24–70). In 12 (63%) patients, infection was eradicated, three patients (16%) had persistent infection and four (21%) developed further infection after initially successful second-stage surgery. Above knee amputation for persistent infection was performed in two patients. In this particularly difficult to treat population, the SMILES spacer two-stage technique has demonstrated encouraging results and presents an attractive alternative to arthrodesis or amputation.
