There is currently no information regarding long-term outcomes following total hip replacement (THR) for hip fracture in patients selected in accordance with national guidelines. We define the long-term outcomes and compare these to short-term outcomes in the same previously reported cohort.

We prospectively identified patients who underwent THR for a displaced hip fracture over a 3-year period from 2007–2010. These patients were followed up at 10 years using the Oxford hip score(OHS), the Short-form 12(SF-12) questionnaire and satisfaction questionnaire. These outcomes were compared to the short-term outcomes previously assessed at 2 years. We identified 128 patients. Mean follow up was 10.4 years. 60 patients(48%) died by the time of review and 5 patients(4%) developed dementia and were unable to respond. 3 patients were untraceable. This left a study group of 60 patients with a mean age of 81.2.

Patients reported excellent outcomes at 10 year follow up and, when compared with short-term outcomes, there was no statistically significant change in levels of satisfaction, OHS, or SF-12. The rates of dislocation(2%), deep infection(2%) and revision(3%) were comparable to those in the literature for elective THR. Mortality in the hip fracture group at 10 years is lower than that of elective registry data.

Long-term outcomes for THR after hip fracture in selected patients are excellent and the early proven benefits are sustained. Our data validates the selection process of national guidelines and confirms low complication rates. THR is a safe and highly effective treatment for fit elderly patients with displaced hip fractures.

We define the long-term outcomes and rates of further operative intervention following displaced Bennett's fractures treated with Kirschner (K)-wire fixation.

We prospectively identified patients who were treated for displaced Bennett's fractures over a 13 year period between 1996 and 2009. Electronic records for these patients were examined and patients were invited to complete a Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire in addition to a patient satisfaction questionnaire.

We identified 143 patients with displaced Bennett's fractures treated with K-wire fixation and followed them up at a mean of 13 years. The mean patient age at the time of injury was 33.2 years. At the time of follow up, 11 patients had died and 1 had developed dementia and was unable to respond. 9 patients had no contact details. This left 122 patients available for recruitment. Of these, 60 did not respond leaving a study group of 62 patients. Patients reported excellent functional outcomes and high levels of satisfaction at follow up. Mean satisfaction was 89% and the mean DASH score was 3.2. The infection rate was 3%. None of the 122 patients had undergone salvage procedures and none of the responders had changed occupation or sporting activities.

Long-term patient reported outcomes following displaced Bennett's are excellent. Fusion surgery or trapeziectomy was not undertaken for any patient in this series nor did this injury result in sporting or occupational changes. The rate of infection is low and similar to the literature for other surgical procedures with percutaneous K-wires.

We define the medium-term outcomes following total hip replacement (THR) for hip fracture. There is currently no information regarding longer term clinical and patient reported outcomes in this group of patients selected in accordance with national guidelines.

We prospectively identified patients who underwent THR for a displaced hip fracture over a three year period between 2007 and 2010. These patients were followed up at 5 years using the Oxford hip score, Short-form 12(SF-12) questionnaire and satisfaction questionnaire.

We identified 128 patients. Mean follow up was at 5.4 years with a mean age of 76.5 years. 21 patients (16%) had died, 12 patients (9%) had developed dementia and 3 patients had no contact details, leaving a study group of 92 patients. 74 patients(80%) responded. Patients reported excellent functional outcomes and satisfaction at 5 years (mean Oxford Hip Score 40.3; SF-12 Physical Health Composite Score 44.0; SF-12 Mental Health Composite Score 46.2; mean satisfaction 90%). The rates of dislocation (2%), deep infection (2%) and revision (3%) were comparable to those quoted for elective THR. When compared with 2 year follow up, there was no statistically significant change in outcome.

Medium-term outcomes for THR after hip fracture are excellent and the early proven benefits of this surgery are sustained. Mortality rates are equivalent to elective THR registry data and significantly lower than overall mortality rates following hip fracture. Our data validates the selection process detailed in national guidelines and confirms the low complication rate. THR is a safe and highly effective treatment for fit elderly patients with displaced hip fractures.

This study describes the long term clinical and patient reported outcomes following simple dislocation of the elbow.

We identified all adult patients treated at our trauma centre for a simple dislocation of the elbow over 10 years. 140 patients were identified and 110 (79%) patients were reviewed at a mean of 88 (95% CI 80–96) months after injury. This included clinical examination, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, an Oxford Elbow questionnaire and a patient satisfaction questionnaire.

Patients reported long-term residual deficits in range of movement. The mean DASH score was 6.5 (95% CI 4 to 9). The mean Oxford Elbow score was 43.5 (95% CI 42.2 to 44.8). The mean satisfaction score was 85.6 (95% CI 82.2 to 89). Sixty-two patients (56%) reported persistent subjective stiffness of the elbow. Nine (8%) reported subjective instability and 68 (62%) complained of continued pain. The DASH, Oxford Elbow and satisfaction scores all showed good correlation with absolute range of movement in the injured elbow. After multivariate analysis, a larger elbow flexion contracture and female gender were both independent predictors of worse DASH scores. Poorer Oxford Elbow scores and overall satisfaction ratings were predicted by reduced flexion-extension arc of movement.

Patients report good long term functional outcomes after simple dislocations of the elbow. These are not entirely benign injuries. There is a high rate of residual pain and stiffness. Functional instability is less common and does not often limit activities.

A rolled-up finger from a surgical glove has been described in the literature and commonly used as a tourniquet during procedures on digits. The National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) issued a rapid response report in December 2009 that recommended the use of CE marked finger tourniquets and prohibited the use of surgical gloves for this purpose. This study aimed to measure the pressures exerted by a range of digital tourniquets.

A Tekscan FlexiForce¯ pressure sensor was used to measure the surface pressures under different types of finger tourniquet applied to a cylinder representing a finger. The tourniquets tested were the Toe-niquet^™, the T-Ring^™ and a tourniquet made using a rolled up surgical glove finger.

The pressure exerted by these tourniquets varied between types and depended on the size of model finger. The lowest mean pressures were produced by the T-Ring(tm) and glove finger tourniquet on a small finger (146 and 120 mmHg), while the highest pressures were produced by the Toe-niquet(tm), which produced 663 and 1560mmHg on the small and large finger models respectively. There was a significant overall difference between tourniquet type (p<0.001) and finger size (p<0.001).

Wide variability in surface pressures is a function of material type, product design and finger size. It is difficult to anticipate and regulate pressures generated by non-pneumatic tourniquets. Tourniquet safety must also focus on procedural issues, ensuring the removal of the tourniquet at the end of procedure, through increased use of surgical checklists.

Aim

To review current military orthopaedic experience and establish if there exists a consensus of opinion in how and if to perform fasciotomy of the foot and to guide other clinicians.