In pre-operative planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA), femoral offset (FO) is frequently underestimated on AP pelvis radiographs as a result of inaccurate patient positioning, imprecise magnification, and radiographic beam divergence. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of predicting three-dimensional (3-D) FO as measured on computed tomography (CT) from measurements performed on standardised AP pelvis radiographs.

In a retrospective cohort study, pre-operative AP pelvis radiographs and corresponding CT scans of a consecutive series of 345 patients (345 hips, 146 males, 199 females, mean age 60 (range: 40-79) years, mean body-mass-index 27 (range: 29-57) kg/m2) with primary end-stage hip osteoarthritis were reviewed. Patients were positioned according to a standardised protocol and all images were calibrated. Using validated custom programmes, FO was measured on corresponding AP pelvis radiographs and CT scans. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the measurement methods were evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). To predict 3-D FO from AP pelvis measurements, the entire cohort was randomly split in two groups and gender specific linear regression equations were derived from a subgroup of 250 patients (group A). The accuracy of the derived prediction equations was subsequently assessed in a second subgroup of 100 patients (group B).

In the entire cohort, mean FO was 39.2mm (95%CI: 38.5-40.0mm) on AP pelvis radiographs and 44.6mm (95%CI: 44.0-45.2mm) on CT scans. FO was underestimated by 14% on AP pelvis radiographs compared to CT (5.4mm, 95%CI: 4.8-6.0mm, p<0.001) and both parameters demonstrated a linear correlation (r=0.642, p<0.001). In group B, we observed no significant difference between gender specific predicted FO (males: 48.0mm, 95%CI: 47.1-48.8mm; females: 42.0mm, 95%CI: 41.1-42.8mm) and FO as measured on CT (males: 47.7mm, 95%CI: 46.1-49.4mm, p=0.689; females: 41.6mm, 95%CI: 40.3-43.0mm, p=0.607).

The results of the present study suggest that femoral offset can be accurately and reliably predicted from AP pelvis radiographs in patients with primary end-stage hip osteoarthritis. Our findings support the surgeon in pre-operative templating and may improve offset and limb length restoration in THA without the routine performance of CT.

In uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), the optimal femoral component should allow both maximum cortical contact with proximal load transfer and accurate restoration of individual joint biomechanics. This is often compromised due to a high variability in proximal femoral anatomy. The aim of this on-going study is to assess the variation in proximal femoral canal shape and its association with geometric and anthropometric parameters in primary hip OA.

In a retrospective cohort study, AP-pelvis radiographs of 98 consecutive patients (42 males, 56 females, mean age 61 (range:45-74) years, BMI 27.4 (range:20.3-44.6) kg/m2) who underwent THA for primary hip OA were reviewed. All radiographs were calibrated and femoral offset (FO) and neck-shaft-angle (NSA) were measured using a validated custom programme. Point-based active shape modelling (ASM) was performed to assess the shape of the inner cortex of the proximal femoral meta- and diaphysis. Independent shape modes were identified using principal component analysis (PCA). Hierarchical cluster analysis of the shape modes was performed to identify natural groupings of patients. Differences in geometric measures of the proximal femur (FO, NSA) and demographic parameters (age, height, weight, BMI) between the clusters were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis one-way-ANOVA or Chi-square tests, as appropriate.

In the entire cohort, mean FO was 39.0 mm, mean NSA was 131 degrees. PCA identified 10 independent shape modes accounting for over 90% of variation in proximal femoral canal shape within the dataset. Cluster Analysis revealed 6 shape clusters for which all 10 shape modes demonstrated a significantly different distribution (p-range:0.000-0.015). We observed significant differences in age (p=0.032), FO (p<0.001) and NSA (p<0.001) between the clusters. No significant differences with regard to gender or BMI were seen.

Our preliminary analysis has identified 6 different patterns of proximal femoral canal shape which are associated with significant differences in femoral offset, neck-shaft-angle and age at time of surgery. We are currently evaluating the entire dataset of 345 patients which will allow a comprehensive classification of variation in proximal femoral shape and joint geometry. The present data may optimise preoperative planning and improve future implant design in THA.