Amputation in intractable cases of complex regional pain syndrome
(CRPS) remains controversial. The likelihood of recurrent Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS),
residual and phantom limb pain and persistent disability after amputation
is poorly described in the literature. The aims of this study were
to compare pain, function, depression and quality of life between
patients with intractable CRPS who underwent amputation and those
in whom amputation was considered but not performed. There were 19 patients in each group, with comparable demographic
details. The amputated group included 14 men and five women with
a mean age of 31 years ( All participants completed the following questionnaires: Short-Form
(SF) 36, Short Form McGill Pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Pain Disability
Index (PDI), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and a clinical
demographic questionnaire. Aims
Patients and Methods
The mean length of hospitalization was 5 days (range 1–36). A multivariate statistical analysis was done, and it was found that being included in more than one category stands alone as the only predictor for prolonged hospitalization. Infection rate was 9.7%, with length of stay being the only parameter associated with infection.
All patients underwent thorough physical examination and AOFAS Hindfoot score was obtained before treatment and a follow-up examination one week and one year after applicaton of ESWT course. Pain was assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) relating to six parameters: pain on first step in the morning, maximum pain intensity, pain during prolonged walking, standing, at the end of the day and night pain. ESWT was applied in five consecutive courses of 1500 impulses of 0.32mj/mm² once a week in a routine previously described manner. Results:. All the six VAS parameters decreased significantly post treatment. The Vas parameter of the first steps in the mornining was the most severe before 8.6±1.8 and after treatment 4.2±2.0 and 1.4±1.9 one year after tretment (p<
0.0001). Night pain was the less intenes before treatment 3.9±3.7 and was nearly eliminated to 0.9±1.6 and 0.2±0.8 after one week and a one year post treatment (p<
0.0001). AOFAS hind-foot Score increased from 49.7±15.8 before ESWT to 87.7±10.9 and 86.3±10.7 one week and year after the courses (p<
0.0001). Three patients couldn’t complete the ESWT course one, one of them with bilateral PF. From those patients two had tarsal tunnel syndrome and one with the tibial nerve first branch which was fassing through the plantar fascia. There were no side effects other than minimal local discomfort during the session time.