An Implant Disposable Antibacterial Coating (i-DAC®) is described, consisting of a fully resorbable, biocompatible hydrogel, able to release antibacterial and antibiofilm agents. Direct application of the hydrogel on implants prevented infection occurrence in an Biofilm-related infections are among the main reasons for failure of joint prosthesis with high associated social and economical costs. Bacterial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation have been shown to develop early after biomaterials implant into the human body, when a “race to the surface” takes place between the host's cells and the colonizing bacteria eventually present at the surgical site. Providing an antibacterial/antibiofilm coating of the implant may then play a strategic role in preventing biofilm related infections. Here we report the results of a series of Summary Statement
Introduction
The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis often
includes surgical debridement and filling the resultant void with antibiotic-loaded
polymethylmethacrylate cement, bone grafts or bone substitutes.
Recently, the use of bioactive glass to treat bone defects in infections
has been reported in a limited series of patients. However, no direct comparison
between this biomaterial and antibiotic-loaded bone substitute has
been performed. In this retrospective study, we compared the safety and efficacy
of surgical debridement and local application of the bioactive glass
S53P4 in a series of 27 patients affected by chronic osteomyelitis
of the long bones (Group A) with two other series, treated respectively
with an antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate compound
(Group B; n = 27) or a mixture of tricalcium phosphate and an antibiotic-loaded
demineralised bone matrix (Group C; n = 22). Systemic antibiotics
were also used in all groups. After comparable periods of follow-up, the control of infection
was similar in the three groups. In particular, 25 out of 27 (92.6%)
patients of Group A, 24 out of 27 (88.9%) in Group B and 19 out
of 22 (86.3%) in Group C showed no infection recurrence at means
of 21.8 (12 to 36), 22.1 (12 to 36) and 21.5 (12 to 36) months follow-up,
respectively, while Group A showed a reduced wound complication
rate. Our results show that patients treated with a bioactive glass
without local antibiotics achieved similar eradication of infection
and less drainage than those treated with two different antibiotic-loaded
calcium-based bone substitutes. Cite this article:
This technical choice constitutes an effective solution for all those cases where, due to the infective damage, the radical surgical debridement needed or in presence of a septic pseudoarthrosis, there is a relevant loss of bone stock in the proximal femur. As a treatment for these specific clinical patterns oncological prosthetic implants can be used, to overcome the amount of bone loss. Sometimes acetabular prosthetic implantation, or reimplantation, is also needed because of its septic mobilization, otherwise a bicentric endoprosthesis can be implanted. The main issue for the surgeon is the gluteal muscular deficiency, caused often by the loss of the great trochanter, a severe condition often worsened by the damage on muscles and soft tissues given by previous surgical procedures and debridements. The offset itself, really often not sufficient for the limited amount of sizes and lengths of the oncological designed prosthetic implants, represent a key issue of this treatment with a high luxation risk, with a higher rate in those cases when an arthroprosthesis has been performed. In this article are described 4 cases, all four treated with a two-stage surgical approach and a definitive oncological prosthetic system to overcome the severe bone loss of the proximal femur. The cases are examined about the surgical indication to this prosthetic choice, the postoperative period with the related complications (1 case of recurrent luxation) and with a minimum follow up of 6 months (maximum 36 months). In all the cases at the follow up the infection is solved. At the end the specific rehabilitation program for the range of motion and the muscular strength regain, that we developed in our Operative Unit is described; in this program we occasionally used for the immediate post surgery period a jointed hip brace. The length of the rehabilitation could not be standard, but should be customized and variations of the program could be done during the follow up. In the immediate post-surgical period the rehabilitative goals are maintaining the correct posture in bed and regaining the passive articular range of motion. In the longer period the main goals are regain strength of the gluteal muscles, proprioception and gait, even if claudication (Trendelemburg), hyposthenia a recurrent dislocation can be let. The weight bearing is allowed usually at the eight week after surgery, but only after clinical and x-ray evaluation.
Two-stage revision is the most widely accepted and performed intervention for chronically infected joint prosthesis. The choice of this option relies on the following considerations:
higher antibiotic concentrations may be used in the spacers, compared to the cement used for prosthetic fixation in a single-stage procedure, since high dose antibiotic-loaded cement may be too fragile for long term prosthesis fixation (Bucholz, 1986); the frequent occurrence of bone loss and the smooth cortical bone surface, encountered at revision may prevent effective cementing; two-stage revision allows the use of uncemented modular stems, useful for intra-operatively balancing legs’ length, offset and muscular tension; distal fixation allows to overcome proximal frequent bone loss; bone grafts, eventually plus growth factors, may be safely added; a second debridment may enhance the possibility of eradicating the infection; there is a large and growing international literature evidence in support to this option. Two-stage reimplantation using an articulated interval spacer of antibiotic-impregnated bone-cement has been previously investigated and proved as an effective Method:
to adequately fill the void created by the implant removal, to prevent limb shortening and soft-tissue contracture, to allow a better function, to provide local antibiotic therapy, to eradicate infection, to facilitate reimplantation. However a considerable variation in the form and function of interval spacers exists. A spacer may in fact be commercially made, or it may be custom-made in the operating room. It may be made entirely of polymethylmethacrylate cement, or it may be a cement-coated metal composite. Favorable results have been reported with each of these types of spacers. Preformed antibiotic-loaded spacers (InterSpace® Hip and InterSpace® Knee, Tecres SpA, Verona, Italy – Hexactech Inc. Gainesville, Florida) offer:
known mechanical resistance; predictable antibiotic release; reduced surgical time; joint function preservation and partial weight bearing; standardized technique. In particular, as to concern the hip, their most peculiar feature is their availability in short and long stem shapes, that allows to overcome frequent proximal femoral bone defects Acceptable costs (<
5% of the total costs for a two-stage procedure).
28 sera were collected from controls (patients with uninfected joint prosthesis, as judged from clinical, laboratory and radiological data) and 25 sera were obtained from patients with known SOIRI, sustained by S. aureus or coagulase-negative Staphilococci (CNS) (positive joint aspiration and/or intra-operative cultural examination).
Reasons for bone loss in septic hip prosthesis include osteolysis caused by the infection in itself and by the mechanical loosening, while implant removal and the necessary bone debridment usually ends in a even more severe bone loss. In two stage revision surgery the use of a long stem antibiotic-loaded pre-formed cement spacer (Spacer G – Tecres s.r.l., Italy) appears particularly useful to allow mechanical stability and antibiotic local elution even in the presence of wide proximal femoral bone loss. After two months the revision is performed with non-cemented long stem modular implants (Profemur – Wright-Cremascoli) without the need for massive bone grafts. Recently we have also started using growth factors to stimulate bone stock reconstitution. In all the patients a double antibiotic therapy is administered after the first and second stage procedures for 6–8 weeks. The results obtained (54 patients, follow-up 2 – 5 years) according to this protocol show the absence of infection recurrence, 10 cranial spacer dislocation, not treated, 2 revision prosthesis dislocations, that required open reduction, 1 transient femoral nerve palsy. The described technique, used according to a proper protocol, allows to obtain good results, in the medium term follow-up.
Septic knee prosthesis revision is particularly challenging either for the eradication of the infection and for functional recovery of the patient. 18 patients treated from year 2000 to 2003, treated according to the same medical and surgical protocol have been reviewed. In all cases the following steps have been followed:
- removal of the septic prosthesis, debridement and implant of an articulated pre-formed cement spacer; - at 2 months, removal of the spacer and implant of a modular PFC knee revision prosthesis; - when appropriate osteotomy and synthesis of the anterior tibial tuberosity; - double antibiotic therapy, parentheral and oral, for 2 months after the first and after the second stage procedure. At a mean 18 months follow-up, we observed:
- no infection recurrence in all cases (one patient is lost to follow-up); - range of motion: flexion 73° +− 25°, extension – 5° +− 3°; - 1 dislocation of the articulated spacer; - 1 femoral fracture. Two-stage septic knee prosthesis revision, according to a the described protocol, allows to obtain high infection eradication rate and acceptable functional recovery, in the medium term follow-up.
Different conditions may lead to bone loss in bone infections. Septic non-unions, osteomyelitis, septic joint prosthesis are all conditions that may be associated with the need for bone grafts and/or of bone substitutes. The risk of infection recurrence makes, in these cases, particularly challenging the choice of the type of bone implant. The use of growth factors, eventually associated with autologous or homologous bone grafts or with bone substitutes, may be helpful in restoring the bone stock, allowing to fill large bone defects, once the infection is controlled. We present the preliminary results in 10 patients in which autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) has been used to treat large bone defect in two stage hip reconstruction (7 cases) and in previously infected non-unions (3 patients). At a minimum follow-up of 6 months (maximum 18 months) a significant new bone formation occurred at the site of PRP application in all the cases treated and no signs of infection recurrence are present at the time of writing. This is the first report on the short-term safety of use of PRP for the treatment of bone loss in previously infected bones in humans. The limited number of patients and the follow-up do not allow at the moment to drive any conclusion regarding the efficacy and safety in the long term, and the use of PRP with this indications should be limited to selected cases.
A prospective study on 24 patients (33 hip arthroplasties) affected by painful total hip replacement was conducted. All patient had a blood test, X-rays, ultrasound scan, cultures, Tc 99m bone scan (SPECT), and F18FDG-PET. Fifteen patients were operated on (nine two-stage revisions, six débridements). During operation, cultures were repeated and bone biopsy was performed at the sites of increased PET uptake. Bone and soft tissue débridement was specifically performed at the site of PET uptake with maximal preservation of bone stock. There were 20 infected prostheses. Infection was demonstrated by positive culture in all cases and positive biopsy in operated cases. Sensibility and specificity of PET were 100% and 92%, respectively. All patients who were operated on were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 7 months. The nine patients who had revision were free of infection at follow-up. In our experience PET is easy to perform, has an excellent sensitivity and good specificity and can be placed at the end point of the flow-chart for diagnosis of total hip replacement infection. Moreover, PET scan could be useful in pre-operative planning of revision surgery as it has better anatomical definition than traditional scans. Presently, it involves high costs and should only be used in selected cases. Its real usefulness in revision surgery has to be confirmed by a longer follow-up of treated cases.
Bone loss, either due to a septic process or to surgical débridements, is frequently associated with bone infections. Bone loss may be present in septic non-unions, osteomyelitis or septic joint prosthesis. In each of these conditions the use of bone or bone substitutes may be indicated. However, the risk of septic recurrence makes the choice of the right implant in these patients particularly difficult. Clinical cases are presented to show the different choices available. Attention is focussed on: (1) when, in the presence of bone loss, a bone graft can be avoided and with which suitable procedures good results can be obtained; (2) when and how autologous bone grafts should be used; (3) when homologous bone grafts or bone substitutes are indicated; (4) how bone grafts should be protected against bacterial adesion and proliferation; and (5) the role of new technologies, such as bone growth factors. In this regard the clinical results are presented of the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) added to autologous or homologous bone after bone débridement in six patients treated with two-stage non-cemented revision of septic hip prosthesis and in two patients with septic non-union of the femur. At a minimum follow-up of 6 months (max. 1 year), we did not observe any infection recurrence, while bone remodelling and clinical outcome were favourable. The use of bone growth factors such as PRP possibly added to autologous or homologous bone appears to be a promising technique to achieve bone reconstruction in débrided bone infections. However, with the limited numbers of patients and the short-term follow-up conclusions cannot be drawn and the use of growth factors with this indication should be limited to selected cases: patients with wide bone loss and with no signs of active infections. No international guidelines are available concerning bone reconstruction in infections. Clinical experience shows that different surgical procedures are effective and the choice should take into considerations the type and site of bone defect, the host type and the pathogenesis of the bone loss. Growth factors may be a useful tool in these conditions and further studies are indicated.
A modular neck allows to choose the offset of the femoral head and the degree of anti-retroversion, lateralization and varus-valgus intraoperatively. At the G. Pini Institute we have been using modular necks in custom prostheses since 1989. Excellent results in this application did open the way to a larger use in off-the-shelf prostheses. Modular necks can be now coupled with different stems, leaving the surgeon free to use the preferred prosthetic stem design. Modular necks have been implanted in more than 50,000 in the world. Medium term results in custom prosthesis and the experience in off-the-shelf non-cemented stems are presented, together with further improvements of this technology under study. From 1989 to December 1999, 481 custom stems have been implanted. All patients but ten received modular necks. The prostheses were made of a titanium alloy and HA coated. 61 % of patients had dysplastic oxarthrosis. 372 implants performed between 1989 and 1996 were retrospectively evaluated. Data from off-the-shelf prosthesis, at a shorter follow-up, are also reported. Laboratory data showed that the use of an elliptical Morse cone of the neck reduced wear debris production to less than 1 mg/year. In custom implants, (mean follow-up: 7 years), we did not observe any thigh pain or radiological signs of osteolysis or fretting. Mean leg-length discrepancy was 2.8 cm pre-op and 0.3 cm post-operatively. Off-the-shelf implants also showed good clinical and radiological results. New design modular necks will increase the possible range of motion and provide more solutions for positioning the center of rotation. Modular neck is a safe and reliable solution to obtain the correct position of the center of rotation intra-operatively, without side effects. Applications in off-the-shelf prostheses allow to reduce costs while maintaining the advantages of this technology.