Aim

Infection rates after revision THA vary widely, up to 12%. In countries that use antibiotic-loaded cemented stems in combination with perioperative IV antibiotics, infection rates in registry studies are lower. In many countries, however, cementless revision implants are preferred. Our aim was to apply an antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate coating to cementless revision stems to reduce periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study sought to answer two questions: 1) Does the coating of cementless revision stems with calcium sulfate inhibit osteointegration in THA? 2) Does the antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate coating of revision stems reduce the incidence of PJI?

Aim

Dissolvable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate beads have been utilized for management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and for aseptic revision arthroplasty. However, wound drainage and toxic reactive synovitis have been substantial problems in prior studies. Currently a commercially pure, physiologic product has been introduced that may reduce complications associated with this treatment modality. We aim to answer the question: does a commercially pure, physiologic version of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads reduce wound drainage and provide efficacious treatment for PJI and aseptic revision arthroplasty?

Over the past 10 years, the orthopedic community has witnessed an increased interest in more conservative surgical techniques for hip arthroplasty. During this time, second-generation hip resurfacing and minimally invasive surgery enjoyed extensive marketing attention. After a decade of this renewed interest, both of these methods have met with serious concerns. As hip resurfacing numbers decline, both patients and surgeons are looking for other potentially successful conservative treatments to THA. This search has focused surgeon interest toward short-stem designs.

Today, a variety of short-stem implants are available with very little clarification of design rationale, fixation features, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes. Virtually every major implant company now offers a “short stem,” and now there are a plethora of different designs. It is important to note, however, that not all short stems achieve initial fixation at the same bone interface region. Furthermore, surgical techniques vary greatly, and postoperative radiographic interpretation of short-stem position and fixation need to be carefully scrutinized.

The purpose of this paper is to review past, present, and potential future developments of short femoral stems and to present a classification system that can offer guidance when reporting on the many different stem variations.

Short Curved neck-sparing stem (JISRF classification 2a). Recently, new designs are following Pipino's Biodynamic stem style of saving the femoral neck. These designs feature a short curved stem that finds its stabilization contact region in the femoral neck and saves considerable bone in the medial calcar region. In addition, the curvature of the stem prevents violation of the lateral trochanteric region. The shorter stem also reduces blood loss by not reaming the femoral canal distally. These style stems generally have a variable stem length between 90 and 135 mm. This might not appear much shorter than conventional cementless stems (110 to 150 mm). However, the shorter curved neck sparing stems penetrate on average 1 to 2 cm less distally in the femoral canal.

Short stems have a definite role in modern THA, as greater emphasis is being placed on soft tissue and bone sparing techniques and as refinements continue in the understanding of proximal femoral fixation.

Metaphyseal short stems have significantly less surface contact area compared with conventional length stems and as a result, they might have less torsional and axial resistance.

Neck-retaining short stems provide additional axial and torsional stability and reduced stress at the implant– bone interface and may be a consideration in the more active patient profile. Bone quality and the patient's physical activity should be considered prior to the selection of short-stem devices. Many short-stem designs have considerably different style features that may alter bone remodeling. Knowing the design and the required technique is vital to fit the device properly to the patient. The variations of short stems available call for caution in their overall use until there is better understanding of how dependent these stems are on individual stem features, bone quality, and surgical techniques. Overall, the authors are cautiously optimistic and continue advocating their selective use.

Controversy has existed for decades over the role of fretting-corrosion in modular CoCr heads used with stems of CoCr vs Ti6Al4V. Since retrieval data on taper performance remains scant, we report here an18-year survivorship of a Ti6Al4V: CoCr combination (APR design; Intermedics Inc). Unique to this study were the threaded profiles present on both stem and head tapers (Fig. 1).

This female patient was revised for pain, osteolysis and recurrent hip dislocation at 17 years, 10 months. A prior MPE hip replacement performed for her severely dysplastic right hip had lasted 11 years. At this 2nd revision, the 28 mm CoCr head was found dislocated posteriorly and superiorly. Metallosis was evident in the tissues. The polyethylene liner showed extensive rim damage on both anterior and posterior aspects. The neck of her APR Revision stem (Intermedics Inc) had worn through the polyethylene rim and impinged on the metal cage. The cage was found loose, the liner had disassociated, and the peri-trochanteric areas were compromised by massive osteolysis. The femoral stem and head were removed together without disassembly. The femoral stem and acetabular construct were replaced by an ARCOS revision system using 36 mm head with a Freedom cup (cemented to Max-Ti cage; Biomet Inc.).

The complete femoral neck and head were bi-valved assembled in horizontal plane for direct imaging by interferometry and SEM (Fig. 1a). After sectioning the head separated from the stem. Quantitative imaging used 1 to 5 regions with 6-replicate measurements per region and differentiation into contact and non-contact zones (Fig. 1b). Visual corrosion mapping (3) was recorded digitally in 4 anatomical views (Figs 1b–f).

The thread profile on contact zone inside the head (Fig. 2a) had a pitch of approximately 40 μm and a peak-to-valley depth of 4 μm overall (Fig. 2b profile section of thread: PV = 2 μm). The thread profile on stem trunnion (Fig. 3a) had a pitch of approximately 125 μm and a peak-to-valley depth of 3.5 μm overall (Fig. 2b profile section of thread: PV = 1 μm). Thus the stem trunnion thread was much coarser than the head. Overall corrosion grading was judged very mild. Overall we were satisfied that this Ti6Al4V: CoCr combination taper junction with threaded interfaces had performed very well for 18 years. Nevertheless, our visual grading was subject to opinion and thus unrewarding. The continuing project will quantify the contacting and non-contacting regions of head and stem (Fig. 1b).

Introduction

Architectural changes occurring in the proximal femur after THA continues to be a problem. Stress shielding occurs regardless of fixation method. The resultant bone loss can lead to implant loosening and breakage of the implant. A new novel tissue sparing neck-stabilised stem has been designed to address these concerns.

Introduction

The use of short stems has been growing in THA for the past five years. As a result, a large number of short stem designs are available in the market place. However, fixation points differ for many of the designs resulting in different radiographic modeling creating confusion when trying to collate to clinical findings. We have created a classification system in an attempted to provide clarity in analyzing radiographic and clinical findings.