Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1578 - 1585
1 Dec 2014
Rankin KS Sprowson AP McNamara I Akiyama T Buchbinder R Costa ML Rasmussen S Nathan SS Kumta S Rangan A

Trauma and orthopaedics is the largest of the surgical specialties and yet attracts a disproportionately small fraction of available national and international funding for health research. With the burden of musculoskeletal disease increasing, high-quality research is required to improve the evidence base for orthopaedic practice. Using the current research landscape in the United Kingdom as an example, but also addressing the international perspective, we highlight the issues surrounding poor levels of research funding in trauma and orthopaedics and indicate avenues for improving the impact and success of surgical musculoskeletal research.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1578–85.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 2, Issue 11 | Pages 245 - 247
1 Nov 2013
Sprowson AP Rankin KS McNamara I Costa ML Rangan A

The peer review process for the evaluation of manuscripts for publication needs to be better understood by the orthopaedic community. Improving the degree of transparency surrounding the review process and educating orthopaedic surgeons on how to improve their manuscripts for submission will help improve both the review procedure and resultant feedback, with an increase in the quality of the subsequent publications. This article seeks to clarify the peer review process and suggest simple ways in which the quality of submissions can be improved to maximise publication success.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:245–7.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XVIII | Pages 48 - 48
1 May 2012
McNamara I Rayment A Best S Rushton N
Full Access

In vitro femoral studies have demonstrated the addition of hydroxyapatite (HA), to morcellised bone graft (MBG) decreases femoral prosthesis subsidence. However, with an increased risk of femoral fracture during the impaction of a MBG:HA mixture, possibly due to greater force transmission to the femoral cortex via the HA. The aim was to compare the hoop strains and subsidence of a 1:1 mixture of MBG:HA with pure bone allograft during impaction and subsequent endurance testing in a revision hip arthroplasty model.

Materials and methods Large Sawbone femurs were prepared to represent a femur with bone loss (Sawbones, Sweden). 12 uniaxial strain gauges were attached to each femur at 0, 90, 180 and 270 degrees, at distal, midshaft, proximal points to measure hoop strain. Impaction grafting was performed using X-Change 2 instruments and an Instron servohydaulic machine for 2 distal impactions and 4 proximal impactions for 60 impactions each.

Study groups

The study consisted of four experimental groups: 1)Pure MBG, force of 1.98 kN 2)Pure MBG, force 3.63kN. 3)1:1 mixture of MBG: porous HA (pHA), 4)1:1 mixture MBG: non porous HA (npHA). 6 samples of each group were performed.

Endurance testing

The potted femur was loaded in a manner representing the walking cycle (1.98kN) at 1 Hz for 50 000 cycles. The displacement of the femoral head during loading was measured by two displacement transducers (LVDT) were mounted on aluminum brackets to measure vertical displacement and rotation.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XVIII | Pages 33 - 33
1 May 2012
McNamara I Ong M Rayment A Brooks R Prevost T Best S Rushton N
Full Access

Problems associated with allograft are well known. The addition of hydroxyapatite (HA) to allograft has various mechanical advantages, especially within revision arthroplasty. The mixing of bone and HA results in mechanical properties different from the individual parts. However, at present the changes in material properties the mix have not been fully investigated and the optimum mixing ratio not characterized. A compressive uniaxial chamber was used to investigate the change in mechanical properties occurring with the addition of HA in varying proportions to morcellised bone graft (MBG).

Materials and methods

MBG was prepared using femoral heads donated from patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery using a bone mill in a standard manner. Non porous HA (npHA) was prepared using a precipitation method of Calcium Carbonate and Orthophosphoric acid. The porous HA, (pHA) is a 60% macroporosity HA commercially prepared.

Chamber

The uniaxial compression chamber was a 30mm diameter, steel chamber. Holes were drilled to allow fluid drainage. Loads were applied using a 10 kN load cell. Specimens were prepared in the volumetric proportions pure HA, pure MBG, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2 ratio of MBG to HA. The samples were subjected to compressive forces of incrementally increasing loads of up to 2 KN for 60 cycles. The sample was then allowed to creep under a stress of 2 kN. MBG was also tested up to forces of 7 kN. The mechanical parameters that were examined were the stiffness of the sample at the 60th cycle, (Ec60), and creep