There is a drive to reduce length of stay in children undergoing limb reconstruction but a reduction in community physiotherapy input and a consequent pressure to ensure children are as independent as possible prior to discharge. This study aims to look at time taken and potential factors effecting the achievement of pre-set mobility goals and length of stay in this population Between June 2018 and November 2021 data was collated for patients who underwent limb reconstruction at Great Ormond Street hospital. 77 patients were reviewed. Data collected included type and location of lengthening device and length of stay. A modified version of the Goal Attainment Score (GAS) was used and included 3 goals which the child needed to achieve within 7 days post-operatively.Introduction
Materials and Methods
MRI wait times for patients with back related complaints are disturbingly long despite the common consensus that axial imaging is not required to diagnose and treat a majority of these problems. This wait often delays appropriate treatment. Many unhelpful MRI scan reports lead to unnecessary apprehension for referring doctors and their patients and frequently stimulate additional surgical consultation requests. This problem is aggravated by surgeons requiring axial imaging before scheduling consultation. Most spine surgeons appreciate that an expert interview and exam can identify those patients for whom axial imaging would be useful in diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this project was to test the hypothesis: “Advanced practice Orthopaedic physiotherapists with surgical screening training possess the skills in spine specific interview and exam to identify those patients for whom axial imaging would be useful.” To test this hypothesis 75 patients from three separate clinical cohorts were evaluated. The physiotherapist and Orthopaedic surgeon independently predicted from the clinical interview and exam whether they believed that an MRI scan would be helpful in patient management. The level of agreement was calculated using chance corrected agreement or kappa values. Subsequently the completed MRI scans were reviewed to evaluate whether each prediction was correct.Purpose
Method
