In total knee arthroplasty, the aim is to relieve pain and provide a stable, functional knee. Sagittal stability is crucial in enabling a patient to return to functional activities. Knee implants with a medial pivot (MP) design are thought to more accurately reproduce the mechanics of the native joint, and potentially confer greater antero-posterior stability through the range of flexion than some other implant designs. This study aims to compare the sagittal stability of four different total knee arthroplasty implant designs. Method Comparison was made between four different implant designs: medial pivot (MP), two different types of cruciate retaining (CR1 and CR 2) and deep dish (DD). A cohort of 30 Medial Pivot (MP) knees were compared with matched patients from each of the other designs, 10 in each group. Patients were matched for age, body mass index and time to follow up. Clinical examination was carried out by an orthopaedic surgeon blinded to implant type, and sagittal stability was tested using a KT1000 knee arthrometer, applying 67N of force at 30˚ and 90˚.Introduction
Aim
Component positioning is of great importance in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and navigation systems can help guide surgeons in the optimal placement of the implants. We report on a newly developed navigation system which employs an inertial measurement unit (IMU) to measure acetabular cup inclination and anteversion. To assess the accuracy of the IMU when used for acetabular cup placement and compare this with an established optical navigation system (ONS).Introduction
Aims
Accurate implant positioning is of supreme importance in total knee replacement (TKR). The rotational profile of the femoral and tibial components can affect outcomes, and the aim is to achieve coronal conformity with parallelism between the medio-lateral axes of the femur and tibia. The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of implant rotation in total knee replacement.Background
Aims
