Introduction

Fracture related infection (FRI) is a challenging complication to manage in an orthoplastic setting. Consensus guidelines have been created to standardise the diagnosis of FRI and comprise confirmatory and suggestive criteria. In this study, the aim is to assess the diagnostic criteria and management of FRI with a particular focus on soft tissue reconstruction.

The aim of this study is to compare functional, clinical and radiological outcomes in K-wire fixation versus volar fixed-angle plate fixation in unstable, dorsally angulated distal radius fractures.

Fifty-four adult patients with an isolated closed, unilateral, unstable, distal radius fracture were recruited to participate in the study. Only dorsally displaced fractures with no articular comminution were included. Patients were randomised to have their fracture treated with either closed reduction and K-wire fixation (3 wires) or fixed-angle volar plating. Both groups were immobilised in a below elbow cast for six weeks. The wires removed in the outpatients at six weeks and both groups were referred for physiotherapy. Independent clinical review was performed at three and six months post injury. Functional scoring was performed using the DASH and Gartland and Werley scoring systems. Radiographs were evaluated by an independent orthopaedic surgeon.

Twenty-five patients were treated with a plate and twenty-nine with wires. There were no complications in the plate group. There were 9 complications in the K-wire group with 3 patients requiring a second operation (1 corrective osteotomy for malunion, 1 median nerve decompression and 1 retrieval of a migrated wire). The remaining complications included: 5 pin site infections (3 treated with early pin removal and 2 with oral antibiotics only), and 1 superficial radial nerve palsy. There were no tendon ruptures.

Both groups scored satisfactory functional results with no statistical difference. There was a statistically significant difference in the radiological outcomes with the plate group achieving better results.

We conclude that in unstable dorsally angulated distal radius fractures volar fixed-angle plate fixation is able to achieve comparable functional results to K-wire fixation with better radiological results and fewer complications. This has resulted in a change in our clinical practice.

For any fracture classification, a high level of intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability is desirable. We compare the consistency of the AO and Neer classifications for proximal humerus fractures with an assessment of the digitised radiographs of 100 fractures by 10 orthopaedic surgeons and 5 radiologists using the General Electric Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS), allowing manipulation of the image. This process repeated 1 month later.

Reproducibility and reliability moderate for both the AO and Neer systems. Reproducibility using the AO/ ASIF system was slightly greater. The assessor’s level of experience and specialty did affect accuracy. The ability to electronically manipulate images does not improve reliability and their sole use in describing these injuries and comparing similarly classified fractures from different centres is not recommended.

Fractures of the proximal humerus are common. Most undisplaced or minimally displaced, and treated conservatively. Up to one fifth may benefit from surgery. As decisions regarding treatment are based on the fracture type, a radiological classification should be easy to use and have a high degree of reliability and reproducibility to serve as a useful discriminator, creating standards by which treatment can be recommended and outcomes compared.

Radiographs of 100 fractures of the proximal humerus selected. A true anteroposterior, scapular lateral, and axillary radiograph taken for each fracture. 10 orthopaedic surgeons and 5 radiologists recruited as assessors, including 5 specialist registrars. Each given a printed description of both Neer and AO classifications, a goniometer and ruler. The assessment preceeded by short lecture. Radiographs could be manipulated digitally for size, contrast, brightness, orientation and the negative image displayed. We did not require assessors to determine subgroups for reasons of simplicity. Reproducibility and reliability analysed using Kappa statistical methods. Coefficients for agreement compared using the Student t test incorporating the standard errors of kappa for these groups. A comparison made between radiologists and surgeons, and then consultant orthopaedic surgeons and trainees.

In each case the AO/ASIF system was statistically (p< 0.01) more accurate.

Agreement was greater for less complex (one and two part, and type A) fractures.

Level of experience produced a statistically (p< 0.01) significant difference in accuracy. Specialty did not.

Our analysis comparing the Neer and AO systems uses the largest group of assessors reviewing the largest number of radiographs reported in the literature.

We concur with others in concluding that using these systems in isolation in determining treatment and comparing results following treatment cannot be recommended

For any fracture classification, a high level of intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability is desirable. We compare the consistency of the AO and Frykman classifications for distal radius fractures using digitised radiographs of 100 fractures by 15 orthopaedic surgeons and 5 radiologists using a Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS). The process was repeated 1 month later. Reproducibility moderate for both the AO and Frykman systems, reliability only fair for both the AO and Frykman systems. In each case reproducibilty using the Frykman system was slightly greater. The assessor’s level of experience and specialty was not seen to influence accuracy. The ability to electronically manipulate images does not appear to improve reliability compared to the use of traditional hard copies, and their sole use in describing these injuries is not recommended.

These fractures are common, approximately one sixth of all fractures and the most commonly occurring fractures in adults. Their multitude of eponyms hint at the difficulty in formulating a comprehensive and useable system. The Frykman classification is most popular, but limited- does not quantify displacement, shortening or the extent of comminution. The more comprehensive AO system is limited in its complexity with 27 possible subdivisions. Computerised tomography shown to give only marginal improvement in consistency of classification.

Radiographs of 100 fractures selected. Anteroposterior and lateral view for each. 15 orthopaedic surgeons and 5 radiologists recruited as assessors, including 5 specialist registrars. Each given a printed description of Frykman and AO classifications. Radiographs could be manipulated digitally. Intra and inter-observer reproducibility analysed. A comparison made comparing reproducibility between radiologists and surgeons, consultant orthopaedic surgeons and trainees. Statistical methods; analysis involves adjustment of observed proportion of agreement between observers by correction for the proportion of agreement that could have occurred by chance. Kappa coefficients compared using the Student t test incorporating standard errors of kappa for these groups.

Median interobserver reliability was fair for both the AO (kappa = 0.31, range 0.2 to 0.38) and Frykman (kappa = 0.36, range 0.30 to 0.43) systems. Median intraobserver reproducibility was moderate for both the AO (kappa = 0.45, range 0.42 to 0.48) and Frykman (kappa = 0.55, range 0.51 to 0.57) systems. In each case the Frykman system was statistically (p< 0.01) more accurate. Level of experience, or specialty was not seen to influence accuracy (p< 0.01).

Our results demonstrate that using them in isolation in determining treatment and comparing results following treatment cannot be recommended

Regional anaesthesia, and the supplementation of either general or spinal anaesthesia with nerve block is well established and becoming increasingly more popular. Femoral, sciatic and obturator nerve blockade, in alone or in combination, by means of single shot or continuous infusion has been shown to significantly improve pain control and post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We identify equally significant morbidity associated with this practice, with delayed post operative rehabilitation, increase in length of stay, reduction in range of movement and local adverse symptoms at the site of injection and paraesthesia at 3 months post operatively.

2 surgeons were recruited to contribute 100 consecutive total knee replacements each to this study. Each worked exclusively with a one anaesthetist. Each had a predictable and different practice. One employed either spinal or general anaesthesia which the surgeon supplemented with end of operation infiltration of soft tissues in the surgical field including the capsule and skin incision with ropivacaine 300mg, adrenaline 500μg and ketorolac 30mg with normal saline added to make a volume of 100ml. The second employed either spinal or general anaesthesia but supplemented this with a single combined femoral and sciatic nerve block performed pre-operatively. Intravenous opiate analgesia administed via patient controlled analgesia pump for 24 hours post operatively, paracetamol 1g 6 hourly and ibuprofen 300mg 8 hourly where appropriate were prescribed by both anaesthetists. We recorded the incidence of insertion of urinary catheter, deep venous thrombosis diagnosed within 3 and 12 weeks, recovery of lower limb power to grade 5/5, range of movement achieved in each postoperative day and at 12 weeks post operatively, length of stay in addition to PONV and pain scores using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and collected every 6 hours. Localised pain and tenderness at the site of injection was noted at 12 weeks, and persistent paraesthesia.

As predicted patients in the group receiving nerve block has significantly less pain and post operative nausea and vomiting (p< 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the use of urinary catheters (p = 0.052) or the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (p=0.58). There was however a significant difference in the recovery of lower limb power (p = 0.023), range of movement recorded at 24hr intervals (p=0.038) (at 12 weeks p=0.54) and length of stay in hospital (0.038). One patient had an almost complete femoral nerve palsy at 12 weeks and required a manipulation under anaesthesia of her knee following recovery of same.

Nerve blockade is an increasingly popular method of controlling post-operative pain. We demonstrate some adverse effects on rehabilitation following this practice in addition to the increased financial and logistical burden of a longer inpatient stay.

Purpose: This study compares clinical and radiological outcomes of K-wire fixation with volar locking plate (i.e. fixed angle) fixation in unstable, dorsally angulated, distal radius fractures.

Materials and methodology: Fifty four adult patients with an isolated, closed, unstable, dorsally angulated fracture without articular comminution were randomised to closed reduction and K-wire fixation (3 wires) or volar locking plate fixation. All were immobilised in a cast for six weeks and prescribed physiotherapy. Independent clinical and radiological assessment was performed at 3 and 6 months post injury, using the DASH and Gartland & Werley scoring systems.

Results: Twenty-four patients were treated with a plate and thirty with K-wires.

There were no complications in the plate group. There were 9 complications in the K-wire group. Three patients required re-operation (for malunion, median nerve compression, and retrieval of a migrated wire). Remaining complications included: 5 pin-site infections and 1 superficial radial nerve palsy.

Plate fixation achieved statistically significant better radiological and functional results.

Conclusion: Volar locking plate fixation achieves better radiological and functional results with fewer complications than K-wire fixation in unstable, dorsally angulated, distal radius fractures.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is gaining popularity for the evaluation of acute wrist injuries, but findings may be confusing with uncertain clinical significance. The presence of bone marrow oedema but no fracture following trauma has been described in the knee and referred to as a bone bruise. The clinical implications of similar findings in the scaphoid have not been described.

This study aims to describe the clinical and radiological findings of an acute wrist injury known as the scaphoid bone bruise. An MRI classification is proposed, and the outcome described.

Between April 2000 and October 2004 all patients who underwent MRI scanning following an acute injury for suspected scaphoid fracture were considered for this study. The scaphoid bone bruise was treated with a degree of caution and the injured limb placed in a below elbow cast for six weeks. Review was arranged at three months when, if symptomatic, a further MRI was performed. A descriptive grading system depending on the extent of the bone bruise was developed.

41 patients were included in the study. At three months 26 were asymptomatic. Seven defaulted from follow-up. Eight patients were still symptomatic and underwent further MRI scan. The bone bruise was classified into four grades according to the degree of oedema found on MRI. Seven patients were grade 1, 18 patients were grade 2, 11 grade 3, and the remaining five grade 4. Of the eight patients who underwent repeat MRI scanning all showed improvement of the bone bruise. At six months only 2 patients remained symptomatic.

While healing around the knee is seldom a problem, the possibility that scaphoid bone bruise may be a precursor to scaphoid non-union needs to be excluded. This study suggests that scaphoid bone bruise is a benign injury with predictable recovery over time and is unlikely to result in long-term morbidity in the form of non-union. It may be feasible to mobilise these injuries much sooner. However, further study with longer follow-up and repeat MRI scans is necessary to be confident that caution about these injuries is unnecessary.

The Taylor Spatial Frame is a new external ring fixation system for correction of multi-planar deformities of the extremities. We report the first 100 consecutive cases treated with this system at the Bristol Limb Reconstruction Unit from November 1999.

The Taylor Spatial Frame incorporates the technology of a virtual hinge and a Stewart Gough Platform. With the use of computer software it is capable of adjustments to within 1 degree and 0.5mm accuracy. Deformities are measured on plain radiographs. Required corrections over any period of time are calculated and a printed prescriptiion of daily adjustments is given to the patients to perform themselves at home.

The following conditions were treated: Non-union (44), malunion (16), Leg length discrepancy (14), limb deformity (13), and acute fractures (13). The aims of frame treatment were non-union treatment (28), bone transport (12), acute fracture healing (12), correction of deformity (28), leg lengthening (15), and arthrodesis (5). Most cases involved the tibia (77) but the frame was also used on the femur (13), knee (3), ankle (4), humerus (2), and forearm (1).

Complete correction of deformity was achieved in all but 7 patients. Union was achieved in 99 cases. All non unions united without bone graft. Mean transport of 46mm and lengthening of 38mm was achieved. 1 arthrodesis failed to unite. All fractures united without any residual deformity. Mean treatment time was 169 days (range 43 to 401). There was 100% compliance with patients performing adjustments themselves. Minor pin site problems were common (34 patients) but only 3 required debridement. Other problems included wire breakage (10), pain (3), peroneal nerve palsy (1) and DVT (1). 15 knees and 11 ankles developed stiffness which resolved.

This study demonstrates the role of the Taylor Spatial Frame as an extremely versatile, accurate and safe new tool at the orthopaedic surgeon’s disposal in limb reconstruction and trauma surgery.