There is increasing evidence that patients with ACL reconstruction using ipsilateral graft harvest are at greater risk of rupture (12.5%) on their contralateral compared to their surgical side (7.9%). The purpose of this study is to re-evaluate patients from a previous study comparing ipsi- versus contralateral graft harvest to compare ACL rupture rate at a minimum 10 year follow-up. An attempt to contact all participants from a previously published study was made to invite them to return for a follow-up. The assessment included an International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Clinical Assessment (IKDC), isokinetic concentric knee flexion and extension strength testing, as well as the ACL-Quality of life (ACL-QOL). A chart review was conducted to identify or confirm subsequent ipsi- or contralateral knee surgeries. In patients with ipsilateral graft, 3/34 (8.8%) re-ruptured and 3/34 (8.8%) had contralateral rupture. In the contralateral group, 1/28 (3.6%) re-ruptured and 2/28 (7.1%) had contralateral rupture. The relative risk (RR) of re-rupture with ipsilateral graft was 2.47 compared to using the contralateral site (p=0.42). RR of rupture on the contralateral side when ipsilateral graft was used was 1.23 compared to the alternate approach. Current contact information was unavailable for 21 patients. Of the 47 remaining, 37 were consented (79%). No difference in the ACL-QOL between groups (ipsilateral 68.4±24.4, contralateral 80.1±16.0, p=0.17) was observed. There were no differences in knee flexion strength between groups (peak torque flexion affected leg: ipsilateral 77.8nm/kg±27.4, contralateral: 90.0 nm/kg±35.1; p=0.32; Unaffected leg: ipsilateral: 83.3 nm/kg±30.2 contralateral 81.7 nm/kg±24.4; p= 0.89). This study suggests that using the contralateral hamstring in ACL rupture is not associated with an increase in ACL rupture on either side. The risk of ACL injury was low in all limbs; therefore, a larger study would be required to definitively state that graft side had no impact.
C-Arm fluoroscopy is limited by its 2D imaging modality and is incapable of providing accurate 3D quantitative assessment of operative anatomy. In High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO), assessing the distance between the mechanical axis of the leg and the centre of the knee joint is difficult to accomplish due to limited fluoroscopic view size. A previously developed sensor-based tracking system (TC-Arm)adds on to C-arm equipment to provide additional quantitative capabilities. A new image-based tracking module was developed for TC-Arm using a reference panel with an array of fiducial markers. The image analysis software segments the marker positions in each image and identifies image coordinates with respect to the panel. Each image's parameters are identified by 2D-3D matching of the panel's 3D model to the marker's epipolar geometries. Finally, the defined linear transformation matrices are applied for positioning all the fluoroscopic images with respect to the same global reference. A Sawbone model of the leg was used as a phantom and marked with radio-dense fiducial markers at the centres of each joint. An Optotrak optoelectronic tracking system data was used to validate the new module's functions. First, tracking accuracy was determined by comparing orthogonal-stereo views and the reconstructed positions of the panel's design. Secondly, TC-Arm's results were compared to the corresponding digitised references points on the Sawbone model to calculate errors in the varus/valgus angle and mechanical axis deviation. The new addition to the TC-Arm has a reasonable tracking accuracy (<3.6mm, <4°) considering HTO: The system measured the mechanical axis deviation for HTO application with an accuracy of 1.3 mm and 1.4°. Comparing these results with the acceptable tolerance of less than 10 mm for MAD reported in the literature, our demonstrated results are considered to be within an acceptable range. With the new module, the capability for three-dimensional quantitative assessments of operative anatomies of any size can be added to any C-arm equipment in the OR. This can have great potential for many complex orthopaedic trauma, reconstruction, or preservation surgeries including HTO.
We reviewed the results of sixteen patients with three and four part proximal humerus fractures treated with the Locking Proximal Humerus Plate (LPHP) in two trauma centres. All fractures were radiographically healed by six weeks. We found a high rate of fixation failure 4/16 cases within two weeks of surgery and range of motion results similar to previously reported techniques. This device has not demonstrated its clear superiority when used in trauma centres which commonly treat proximal humerus fractures. A randomised control trial comparing it to classical techniques and using outcome-based measures would seem appropriate. Proximal humerus fractures with poor functional outcomes are expected to increase in frequency owing to an active ageing population. New angle stable devices have been developed to address the frequently associated osteoporosis and loss of fixation. This study reviews the early experience of fixation with an angle stable device, the LPHP (Synthes Canada). Three and four part fractures treated with the LPHP were identified from the database of two trauma centres. Demographics, patient activity level, mechanism of injury, fracture type were collected. Early complications, maintenance of reduction, and ROM were reviewed. Sixteen fractures treated with the LPHP. Male to female ratio was 1.3:1. Mean age was 51.5 (29–77) Activity: 12/16 sedentary, 4/16 manual labourers. Mechanism: four Low and twelve High-energy injuries. Fracture classification: Five three part, and Eleven four part fractures. Early complications: one wound haematoma,one re-operation for intra-articular hardware, and four of sixteen pts pulled off the greater tuberosity fixation within two weeks of surgery. Union was achieved in all sixteen by six weeks. The mean forward elevation was 60° at six weeks and 80° at three months. This review of the early experience with the LPHP shows a significant rate of fixation failure (4/16 cases) and functional ROM results similar to other previously described techniques. Although a “learning curve effect” is possible, this device has not demonstrated clear superiority with surgeons who commonly treat proximal humerus fractures. A randomised control trial comparing it to classical techniques would seem appropriate.
Range of motion, degree of hemarthrosis and leg circumference was prospectively recorded in one hundred and eighteen consecutive isolated ACL reconstructions. A higher grade of hemarthrosis at one week was associated with a flexion deficit at eight weeks (P=0.002, relative risk 1.93). Increased leg circumference at one week was also associated with a flexion deficit at eight weeks (P=0.007, relative risk 1.37). An extension deficit was not associated with a hemarthrosis (P=0.47) or increased circumference (P=0.07). This prospective review identifies a risk factor for clinicians to be aware of after ACL Reconstruction. These patients merit closer observation and possibly a modified rehabilitation protocol. To determine if increased swelling in the early post operative period is predictive of difficulty in regaining full range of motion after ACL reconstruction. Increased swelling, at one-week post op (presence of a large hemarthrosis or a measured circumference greater than 1.5cm more than the control limb) is associated with flexion loss at eight weeks post surgery. These patients merit closer observation and possibly a modified rehabilitation protocol. Patients with a higher grade of hemarthrosis at one week were more likely to have a flexion deficit at eight weeks (P=0.002, relative risk 1.93). Increased circumference was also associated with a flexion deficit at eight weeks (P=0.007, relative risk 1.37). The presence of a large hemarthrosis was not associated with an extension deficit at (P=0.47) although there was a trend for increased circumference to be associated with extension deficit (P=0.07). One hundred and eighteen consecutive patients were prospectively assessed post ACL reconstruction. Range of motion was measured by goniometer at week one, four and eight. A deficit greater than 10° of flexion or 5° of extension (compared to normal leg) at the eight-week mark was defined as significant. The grade of hemarthrosis and circumference of the leg at the level of the patella were recorded at the same intervals. All patients underwent endoscopic, primary, ACL reconstruction with a standardized post op physio protocol. Exclusion criteria included previous surgery on either knee, significant effusion at the time of surgery or associated ligament injuries.
