Osteoporosis is a disease when bone mass and tissue is lost, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and increase susceptibility to develop fracture. The osteoporosis prevalence increases markedly with age, from 2% at 50 years to more than 25% at 80 years¹ in women. The vast majority of distal radius fractures (DRFs) can be considered fragility fractures. The DRF is usually the first medical presentation of these fractures. With an aging population, all fracture clinics should have embedded screening for bone health and falls risk. DRF is the commonest type of fracture in perimenopausal women and is associated with an increased risk of later non-wrist fracture of up to one in five in the subsequent decade².

According to the national guidelines in managing the fragility fractures of distal radius with regards the bone health review, we, as orthopedic surgeons, are responsible to detect the risky patients, refer them to the responsible team to perform the required investigations and offer the treatment.

We reviewed our local database (E-trauma) all cases of fracture distal radius retrospectively during the period from 01/08/2019 to 29/09/2019. We included total of 45 patients who have been managed conservatively and followed up in fracture clinic. Our inclusion criteria was: women aged 65 years and over, men aged 75 years and over with risk factors, patients who are more than 50 years old and sustained low energy trauma whatever the sex is or any patient who has major risk factor (current or frequent recent use of oral or systemic glucocorticoids, untreated premature menopause or previous fragility fracture).

We found that 96% of patients were 50 years old or more and 84% of the patients were females. 71% of patients were not referred to Osteoporosis clinic and 11% were already under the orthogeriatric care and 18% only were referred. Out of the 8 referred patients, 3 were referred on 1st appointment, 1 on the 3rd appointment, 1 on discharge from fracture clinic to GP again and 3 were without clear documentation of the time of referral.

We concluded that we as trust are not compliant to the national guidelines with regards the osteoporosis review for the DRF as one of the first common presentations of fragility fractures. We also found that the reason for that is that there is no definitive clear pathway for the referral in our local guidelines.

We recommended that the Osteoporosis clinic referral form needs to be available in the fracture clinic in an accessible place and needs to be filled by the doctor reviewing the patient in the fracture clinic in the 1st appointment. A liaison nurse also needs to ensure these forms have been filled and sent to the orthogeriatric team. Alternatively, we added a portal on our online database (e-trauma), therefore the patient who fulfils the criteria for bone health review should be referred to the orthogeriatric team to review.

Congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), also known as club foot or talipes is a common congenital disorder. Parents are using the Internet more and more as a source of information about health care. Unfortunately, the quality of health care information on the Internet varies. This study looked at information available to parents using two instruments for judging the equality of information on the internet. The top five search engines were searched on Google. Three of these were also included in the top 50 sites in Ireland so these 3 sites were used. The phrases CTEV and club foot were searched from all 3 platforms. Websites were then scrutinized using the HON code and the DISCERN tool. 54 organic sites were found for the 3 search engines using the key word club foot. For the key word CTEV 55 matches were returned for the three search engines. 4 websites displayed the HON code. Using the discern tool CTEV websites had a mean score of 60 with a standard deviation of 17. While club foot had a mean score of 56.8 with a standard deviation of 13. Max score 80. Large volumes of information are available to parents on the Internet. Often parents find comfort in sharing experiences and feel empowered by learning about their children's illnesses. However, information provided on the interned can also be ambiguous and disingenuous. Practitioners should be aware of a number of key websites that parents can be directed towards.