The treatment of massive rotator cuff tears remains controversial. There is lack of studies comparing patient-reported outcomes (PROM) of arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repairs (RCR) against large, medium and small RCRs. Our study aims to report the PROM for arthroscopic massive RCR versus non-massive RCR.

Patients undergoing an arthroscopic RCR under a single surgeon over a 5-year period were included. Demographic data were recorded. Pre-operative Quick-DASH and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) were prospectively collected pre-operatively and at final review (mean of 18 months post-operatively). The scores were compared to a matched cohort of patients who had large, medium or small RCRs. A post-hoc power analysis confirmed 98% power was achieved.

82 patients were included in the study. 42 (51%) patients underwent massive RCR. The mean age of patients undergoing massive RCR was 59.7 and 55% (n=23) were female. 21% of massive RCRs had biceps augmentation. Quick-DASH improved significantly from a mean of 46.1 pre-operatively to 15.6 at final follow-up for massive RCRs (p<0.001). OSS improved significantly from a mean of 26.9 pre-operatively to 41.4 at final follow up for massive RCRs (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the final Quick-DASH and OSS scores for massive and non-massive RCRs (p=0.35 and p=0.45 respectively). No revision surgery was required within the minimum one year follow up timescale.

Arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repairs have no functional difference to non-massive rotator cuff repairs in the short term follow up period and should be considered in appropriate patient groups.

There is clear evidence to support removal of the calcific deposit in patients with calcific tendonitis, however, there is conflicting evidence as to whether concomitant subacromial decompression (SAD) is of benefit to the patient. The aim of this study was to conduct a prospective double blind randomised control trial to assess the independent effect of SAD upon the functional outcome of arthroscopic management of calcific tendonitis.

During a four year period 80 patients (power calculation was performed) were recruited to the study who presented with acute calcific tendonitis of the shoulder. Forty patients were randomised to have SAD and 40 were randomised not to have a SAD in combination with arthroscopic decompression of the calcific deposit. All surgery was performed by the senior author who was blinded to the functional assessment of the patients.

There were 21 male and 59 female patients with a mean age of 48.9 (32 to 75) years. The pre-operative short form 12 physical component summary (PCS) was 39.8 and the mental component summary was 52.6, disability arm should and hand (DASH) score was 34.5, and the Constant score (CS) was 45.7. Both groups had a significant improvement in the PCS, DASH, CS at 6 weeks and at one year compared to their pre-operative scores (p<0.001). There were no significant differences demonstrated between the groups for any of the outcome measures assessed at 6 weeks or at one year.

SAD should not be routinely performed as part of the arthroscopic management of acute calcific tendonitis.