The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate syndactyly correction. Patient selection, complexity, technique and aftercare are compared with scar quality, web-creep, hand function and patient satisfaction. 49 syndactyly releases (in 32 patients between 1999-2010) attended evaluation clinics. Demographics, surgical technique (island web transfer, graft vs graftless) aftercare and complications were identified from case notes. Patient satisfaction was obtained via questionnaire. Function was assessed by grip and pincer strength, range of motion, and age of developmental milestones. Where appropriate this was compared to the contralateral side.Introduction
Methods
