To identify the differences in inflammatory profiles between hip OA, knee OA and non-OA control cohorts and investigate the association between cytokine expression and clinical outcome measurements, specifically pain. A total of 250 individuals were recruited in three cohorts (100 knee OA, 50 hip OA, 100 control). Serum was collected and inflammatory profiles analysed using the Multiplex Human Cytokine Panel (Millipore) on the Luminex 100 platform (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX). The pain, physical function and activity limitations of hip OA cohort were scored using the WOMAC, SF-36, HHS and UCLA scores. All cytokine levels were compared between cohorts individually using Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon (MWW) test with Bonferroni multiple comparison correction. Within hip OA cohorts, the effect of hip alignment (impingement and dysplasia) and radiographic grade (Kellgren and Lawrence grade, K/L grade) on cytokine levels were accessed by MWW test. Spearman's rank correlation test used to assess the association between cytokines and pain levels. The three cohorts showed distinct inflammatory profiles. Specifically, EGF, FGF-2, MCP-3, MIP-1a, IL-8 were significant different between knee and hip OA; FGF-2, GRO, IL-8, MCP-1, VEGF were significant different between hip OA and control; Eotaxin, GRO, MCP-1, MIP-1b, VEGF were significant different between knee OA and control (p-value < 0.0012). For hip OA cohorts, cytokines do not differ between K/L grade three and K/L grade four or between patients that displayed either impingement or dysplasia. Three cytokines were significant associated with pain: IL-6 (p-value = 0.045), MDC (p-value = 0.032) and IP-10 (p-value = 0.038). We have demonstrated that differences in serum inflammatory profiles exist between hip and knee OA patients. These differences suggest that OA may include different inflammatory subtypes according to affected joints. We also identified that the cytokine IL-6, MDC and IP-10 are associated with pain level in hip OA patients. These cytokines might help explain the inconsistent of presentation of pain with radiographical severity of OA joints. Future studies are needed to validate our findings and then to understand the following questions: (1) how differently affected joints are reflected in systematic biomarkers; (2) how these cytokines are biologically involved in the OA pain pathway.
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for assessing the results of lower limb arthroplasty. Unrealistic or uneducated expectations may have a significant negative impact on PROMs even when surgery is technically successful. This study's aim was to quantify pre-operative expectations of Scottish patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR). 100 THR and 100 TKR patients completed validated questionnaires (from the Hospital for Special Surgery) prior to their operation after receiving standard pre-operative information (booklet, DVD, consultations). Each patient rated expectations from very important to not having the expectation. A total score was calculated using a numerical scale for the grading of each expectation. Univariate regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between demographics and expectation score. The THR cohort had mean age 66.2 (SD 10.5), 53% female, mean BMI 29.0 (SD 5.1) and mean Oxford score 44 (SD 7). The TKR cohort had mean age 67.6 (SD 8.5), 59% female, mean BMI 32.8 (SD 5.8) and mean Oxford score 44 (SD 8). 100% THR and 96% TKR patients had 10 or more expectations of their operation. All expected pain relief. Other improvements expected were: walking for 100% THA and 99% TKA patients; daily activities for 100% THAs and 96% TKAs; recreational activities for 96% THAs and 93% TKAs; sexual activity for 66% THAs and 59% TKAs; psychological well-being for 98% THAs and 91% TKAs. Regression analysis showed increasing age lowered expectations in both THR (p=0.025) and TKR (p=0.031) patients but that gender, BMI and Oxford score were not significantly related to expectations. This study highlights that patients expect far more than pain relief and improved post-operative mobility from their operation. It is important to discuss and manage these expectations with patients prior to surgery. By doing so, patient satisfaction and PROMs should further improve.
