header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 19 - 19
1 Oct 2017
Masud S Guro R Mohan R Chandratreya A
Full Access

Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OMUKR) is a well-established treatment option for isolated medial compartment arthritis, with good patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).

We present our results of the Oxford Domed Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (ODLUKR) to establish if patients benefit as much as with OMUKR.

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of a single surgeon series of consecutive UKR from 2007 to 2014 were collated with a minimum 2 years follow-up. PROMs data were collected using pre- and post-operative Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) (best score of 48).

One hundred and twenty-eight OMUKR and 27 ODLUKR were performed in the study period. There was no significant difference in the age at time of surgery, but there were significantly more women in the ODLUKR group (74% vs 53%). There was no significant difference in pre-op OKS between the groups (OMUKR = 16/48; ODLUKR = 20/48), or the improvement in OKS post-op (OMUKR = 19 points; ODLUKR = 17 points). One ODLUKR was revised to Total Knee Replacement (TKR) for pain. There were three (11.1%) bearing dislocations, which were treated with thicker bearing exchange, with no subsequent problems. There were no bearing dislocations in the OMUKR. Four OMUKR were revised to TKR due to pain. The overall implant survivorship was 96.3% for ODLUKR and 96.9% for OMUKR.

ODLUKR is a good treatment option for isolated lateral compartment arthritis and gives results equivalent to OMUKR. There is, however, an increased risk of bearing dislocation so should be performed by a high volume UKR surgeon.