Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 8 of 8
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 4 | Pages 434 - 435
1 Apr 2013
Hadjipavlou AG Marshall RW


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 6 | Pages 825 - 828
1 Jun 2012
Rajagopal TS Walia M Wilson HA Marshall RW Andrade AJ Iyer S

We report on two cases of infective spondylodiscitis caused by Gemella haemolysans in otherwise healthy patients. This organism has only rarely been identified as a cause of bone and joint infection, with only two previous reports of infective spondylodiscitis.

We describe the clinical features, investigations and treatment options.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 92-B, Issue 4 | Pages 576 - 578
1 Apr 2010
Altaf F Derbyshire N Marshall RW

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is a rare condition, which is difficult to diagnose. It has not previously been reported following surgery to the cervical spine . We report such a case in a 45-year-old man after cervical disc replacement. A high index of suspicion, with early imaging of the brain and prompt treatment, can produce a favourable outcome, albeit not in this case.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 5 | Pages 554 - 555
1 May 2008
Marshall RW

The indications for lumbar discectomy are pain and neurological dysfunction. This paper considers the extent and timing of neurological recovery following spinal decompression.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 85-B, Issue 4 | Pages 535 - 537
1 May 2003
Gaston P Marshall RW

Studies on recurrent disc herniation quote rates of recurrence without regard to the times of recurrence and the influence of longer follow-up. Our objective was to assess the use of survival analysis to measure the rate of revision after lumbar microdiscectomy. We undertook a retrospective analysis of the hospital records of 993 patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy over a period of ten years. After calculating the overall rate of revision for the mean length of follow-up, we carried out a survival analysis using the life-table method. During the study period 49 patients had a revision microdiscectomy. This gave an overall rate of revision of 4.9% at a mean follow-up of 5.25 years. Using survival analysis, the rate of revision was 7.9% at a follow-up of ten years when the number at risk was 84. Survival analysis gives a more accurate estimation of the true rate of recurrence for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy. The method allows better comparison between different interventions for disc herniation.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 332 - 332
1 Nov 2002
Gaston P Marshall. RW
Full Access

Background: Publications concerning recurrent disc disease quote percentage recurrence without regard to the times of recurrence and the influence of longer follow-up.

Objective: To assess the use of survival analysis to measure revision rate after lumbar microdiscectomy.

Design: A retrospective analysis of the hospital records of all patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy over a nine-year period was undertaken. Patients who had a repeat microdiscectomy at the same level as the index procedure were designated ‘revisions’. The overall revision rate was calculated for the average length of follow-up. A survival analysis was then carried out using the life table method, as described by Murray et al for follow-up of hip arthroplasty.

Subjects: Seven hundred and twenty-nine patients underwent primary microdiscectomy during this time period, average age 40 years.

Results: Twenty-seven patients had a revision microdiscectomy during the study period. This gave an overall revision rate of 3.7% at average follow up of five years, one month. Using survival analysis the revision rate was 5.5% at eight years of follow up, number at risk 51.

Conclusions: Survival analysis gives a more accurate estimation of the true recurrence rate for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy. The method would allow better comparison between different interventions for intervertebral disc herniation.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 84-B, Issue 7 | Pages 1090 - 1090
1 Sep 2002
Marshall RW


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 79-B, Issue 6 | Pages 943 - 947
1 Nov 1997
O’Hara LJ Marshall RW

Of a total of 330 patients requiring operation on a lumbar disc, 20 (6.1%) with lateral disc prolapse had a new muscle-splitting, intertransverse approach which requires minimal resection of bone.

There were 16 men and 4 women with a mean age of 52 years. All had intense radicular pain, 15 had femoral radiculopathy and 19 a neurological deficit. Far lateral herniation of the disc had been confirmed by MRI.

At operation, excellent access was obtained to the spinal nerve, dorsal root ganglion and the disc prolapse. The posterior primary ramus was useful in locating the spinal nerve and dorsal root ganglion during dissection of the intertransverse space.

At review from six months to four years, 12 patients had excellent results with no residual pain and six had good results with mild discomfort and no functional impairment. Two had poor results. There had been neurological improvement in 17 of the 20 patients.

We report a cadaver study of the anatomy of the posterior primary ramus. It is readily identifiable through this approach and can be traced down to the spinal nerve in the intertransverse space.

We recommend the use of a muscle-splitting intertransverse approach to far lateral herniation of the disc, using the posterior primary ramus as the key to safe dissection.