Recent years have witnessed a paradigm shift in the assessment of outcome in spine surgery, with patient-centred questionnaires replacing traditional surgeon-based assessments. The assessment of “complications” — loosely defined as new/unexpected problems arising as a result of surgery — has not enjoyed this same enlightened approach. Patients with lumbar degenerative disorders operated with the goal of pain relief, completed a questionnaire 1 year post-operatively enquiring about complications arising as a consequence of their operation. They rated the bothersomeness of any such complications on a 5-point adjectival scale. Global outcome of surgery and satisfaction were rated on 5-point Likert scales.Background
Methods
Self-rated disability scores in patients with chronic LBP (cLBP) do not always relate well to performance in traditional physical tests (e.g. back strength, fatigability, etc.). Therefore tests using “functional activities” that challenge for example trunk mobility and movement speed have been suggested as alternative “objective” outcome measures. We examined the relationship between self-reported disability and a battery of such functional tests. 37 patients with cLBP took part (45±12y; 23f, 14m); 32 completed 9 weeks' physiotherapy. Before and after therapy, the patients completed the Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RM) and performed a battery of 8 simple tests (stair climb, prolonged flexion, stand to floor, lift test, sock test, roll-up test, pick-up test, fingertip-to-floor test).Background
Methods
