Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Hip

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 13 - 13
1 Jan 2018
Maggs J Swanton E Wilson M Gie G
Full Access

Standard practice in revision total hip replacement (THR) for periprosthetic fracture (PPF) is to remove all cement from the femoral canal prior to implantation of a new component. This can make the procedure time consuming and complex.

Since 1991 it has been our practice to preserve the old femoral cement where it remains well fixed to bone, even if the cement mantle is fractured, and to cement a new component into the old mantle.

We have reviewed the data of 48 consecutive patients, treated at our unit between 1991 and 2009, with a first PPF around a cemented primary THR stem where a cement in cement revision was performed. 8 hips were revised to a standard length stem, 39 hips to a long stem & 1 patient had the same stem reinserted. All fractures were reduced and held with cerclage wires or cables and four had supplementary plate fixation.

Full clinical and radiographic follow up was available in 38 patients & clinical or radiographic follow up in a further 6 patients. The other 4 patients. without follow up but whose outcome is known, have suffered no complications and are pain free. Of the remaining 44 patients, forty-two went on to union of the fracture and two have required further surgery for non-union. One patient has ongoing undiagnosed hip pain.

Our long term experience with cement in cement revision for periprosthetic femoral fractures shows that this is a viable technique with a low complication rate and high rate of union (95%) in what is generally regarded as a very difficult condition to treat.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 25 - 25
1 Jun 2017
Evans J Maggs J Smeatham A Charity J Timperley A
Full Access

When Radiolucent lines (RLL) are observed around cemented acetabular components, they may progress and be associated with loosening.

We reviewed the incidence and progression of RLLs around the Exeter Contemporary flanged acetabular component and compared our results with other published series.

We reviewed a consecutive series of 203 sockets with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Up to date radiographs were reviewed by 2 independent assessors for the presence, location and thickness of RLL and an assessment for loosening/migration was made. Initial post-operative radiographs were examined for any case with RLLs at review.

There were no revisions for aseptic loosening. 103 hips remained in situ with a minimum follow up of 10 years. Lucent lines were seen on 37/103 (36%) of hips with a mean follow up of 12.1 years (10.0–13.9 years). In these 37 hips, the lucency was present in one zone in 84%, two zones in 8% and all three zones in 8%.

Of the 37 hips with a RLL at minimum 10 years follow up, five exhibited a RLL immediately post-operatively. All 5 of these lines were initially isolated to zone 1 and progressed over the 10 years around at least 1 more zone. Only one line became circumferential, although the cup did not migrate.

Compared to previous papers (DeLee & Charnley, Hodgkinson and Garcia-Cimbrelo) the presence of RLL at 10 years is reduced in our series (table 2) and no cup migrated. All RLL seen in cups at both 10 years and immediate post-operatively in our series progressed (table 3), unlike in the previous studies. This reduction in lucent lines may be down to modern cementing techniques, cup design or a combination of both.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly by clicking on ‘Info & Metrics’ above to access author contact details.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 44 - 44
1 Nov 2015
Maggs J Smeatham A Charity J Whitehouse S Gie G Timperley A
Full Access

Introduction

We report on the outcome of a cemented flanged acetabular component at a minimum of 10 years post-operatively.

Patients/Materials & Methods

Two hundred and three hips were reviewed in 194 consecutive patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty using this implant. Cases with acetabular defects requiring bone grafting were excluded. Functional and radiological data were prospectively recorded.