DVC allowed measurements of displacement and strain distribution in bone through the comparison of two, or more, 3D images. Hence, it has a potential as a diagnostic tool in combination with clinical CT. Currently, traditional computed tomography (CT) allows for a detailed 3D analysis of hard tissues, but imaging in a weight-bearing condition is still limited. PedCAT-CT (Curvebeam, USA) emerged as a novel technology allowing, for the first time, 3D imaging under full-weight bearing (Richter, Zech et al. 2015). Specifically, a PedCAT-CT based DVC was employed to establish its reliability through the strain uncertainties produced on bone structure targets, preliminarily to any further clinical studies. In addition, a reverse engineering FE modeling was used to predict possible force associated to displacement errors from DVC. Three porcine thoracic vertebrae were used as bone benchmark for the DVC (Palanca, Tozzi et al. 2016, Tozzi, Dall'Ara et al. 2016). The choice of using porcine vertebrae (in a CT designed for foot/ankle) was driven by availability, as well as similar dimensions to the calcaneus. Each vertebra was immersed in saline solution and scanned twice without any repositioning (zero-strain-test) with a pedCAT-CT (Curvebeam, USA) obtaining an isotropic voxel size of 370 micrometers. Volumes of interest of 35 voxel were cropped inside the vertebrae. Displacement and strains were evaluated using DVC (DaVis-DC, LaVision, Germany), with different spatial resolution. The displacement maps were used to predict the force uncertainties via FE (Ansys Mechanical v.14, Ansys Inc, Canonsburg, PA). Each element was assigned a linear elastic isotropic constitutive law (Young modulus: 8 GPa, Poisson's ratio: 0.3, as in (Follet, Peyrin et al. 2007)). Overall, the precision error of strain measurement was evaluated as the average of the standard deviation of the absolute value of the different component of strain (Liu and Morgan 2007). The force uncertainties obtained with the FE analysis produced magnitudes ranging from 231 to 2376 N. No clear trend on the force was observed in relation to the spatial resolution. Precision errors were smaller than 1000 microstrain in all cases, with the lowest ranging from 83 microstrain for the largest spatial resolution. Full-field strain on the bone tissue did not seem to highlight a preferential distribution of error in the volume. The precision errors showed that the pedCAT-CT based DVC can be sufficient to investigate the bone tissue failure (7000–10000 microstrain) or, physiological deformation if well-optimized. FE analysis produced important force uncertainties up to 2376 N. However, this is a preliminary investigation. Further investigation will give a clearer indication on DVC based PedCAT-CT, as well as force uncertainties predicted. So far, the DVC showed its ability to measure displacement and strain with reasonable reliability with clinical-CT as well.
The treatment of acute full thickness chondral damage within the knee is a surgical challenge. Frequently used surgical techniques include chondroplasty, micro-fracture and chondrocyte implantation. These procedures give unpredictable functional outcomes and if the formation of neocartilage is achieved it is predominantly composed of type 1 collagen. The TruFit osteochondral plug was designed to provide a scaffold for cell proliferation into full thickness chondral defects. It is a composite polymer composed of polylactide co-glycolide, calcium sulphate and poly-glycolide fibres. It is composed of 2 layers, one with a similar trabecular network to cancellous bone and a superficial layer designed to simulate articular lining. The TruFit bone plug was analysed using micro-computed tomography. Its morphology characteristics, granulometry, mechanical performance and image guided failure were tested as well as numerical modelling to assess the permeability of TruFit. Morphological parameters of the TruFit bone plug compared favourably with those of human tissue. Under load the scaffold exhibited shear bands throughout the composite leading to a failure mechanism similar to cancellous bone. Stress relaxation rates of the scaffolds were greatly decreased under wet conditions, likely due to plasticisation of the scaffold by water. The biomechanical properties of the TruFit bone plugs are a cause for concern. The Scaffolds mechanical performance under load rapidly deteriorates in wet conditions at body temperature (the natural knee environment). This early failure will lead to defects in the articular surface where the plug has been inserted. Clinical data is sparse. This study correlates with work performed by Dockery et al & Spalding et al. These clinical studies have shown that the TruFit implant shows no evidence of bone ingrowth or osteoconductivity. It provides no subchondral support to neocartilage or tissue that was stimulated to form around the defects and surgical sites.
Novel hydrogel implants, TRUFIT® bone plugs, have been developed by Smith & Nephew to replace worn-out cartilage surfaces, restoring mobility and relieving joint pain. There is limited information, however, on the biomechanical properties of the implants. Therefore, appropriate mechanical testing and modelling must be carried out to assess their mechanical properties for load bearing applications. In this study, compressive properties of TRUFIT® bone and dual layer implants were examined under selected physiological loading conditions. The bone layer of the implant was also modelled using a biphasic poroviscoelastic (BPVE) material constitutive law and the results from the model are compared with those from the experiments. TRUFIT® CB plugs, with diameters of 11 and 5mm, were sectioned to obtain single layer bone and dual layer samples, with an aspect ratio of 0.86. Specimens were tested in confined and unconfined compressions at two constant strain rates of 0.002/sec (walking) and 0.1/sec (impact) [1-3] on a MTS servo-hydraulic test machine equipped with a bionix envirobath. All samples were tested in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution at 37 °C. A preload of 0.1 MPa was applied and preconditioning (10 cycles of 0.008 strain) at a constant strain rate of 0.005 sec−1 [4] was used. The compressive modulus was calculated from the slope of the linear part of the stress-strain curve. In addition, whilst stress relaxation tests were performed on the bone samples in unconfined compression up to 5% strain, at a strain rate of 0.01/s (running) [1-2].Introduction
Materials and Methods