A modern total knee replacement system was introduced in 2012 in order to improve the mechanics of total knee replacement (TKR). The purpose of this study was to assess the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who have been treated with this modern TKR system at two years postoperatively. Patients who received this TKR system between June of 2012 and September of 2014 were included in this prospective registry-based follow-up study. Demographics, component, and surgical data were collected. Radiographic outcomes were also assessed. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of all patients with 2-year follow-up data were collected. Reasons for revision and overall survival at 2-years were evaluated.Introduction
Methods
When following patients with metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements, current evidence suggests that orthopaedic surgeons should avoid reliance on any single investigative tool. In 2014, guidelines for stratifying patients with MoM hip replacement into groups of low, medium, and high risk of failure based on multiple criteria were published. However, such risk stratification guidelines can be difficult to interpret due to the numerous risk factors related to MoM hip replacements. This is especially true for patients with various (high and low) risk levels for different criteria within the guidelines. The first purpose of this study was to assess if a scoring system can be applied to the current MoM guidelines. The second purpose was to test, using this scoring system, how the contemporary guidelines would classify a cohort of patients with a recalled MoM hip replacement system. The study population consisted of 1301 patients (1434 hips) enrolled from September 2012 to June 2015 in a multicenter follow-up study of a recalled MoM hip replacement system at a mean of 6.2 (range 2.4 – 11.2) years from index surgery. Eleven required scoring criteria were determined based on existing follow-up algorithm recommendations and consisted of patient factors, symptoms, clinical status, implant type, metal ion levels, and radiographic imaging results. Criteria considered ‘low’ risk were given 1 point, 2 points for ‘moderate’ risk, and 3 points for the ‘high’ risk group. Forward stepwise logistic regression was conducted to determine the minimum set of predictive variables for risk of revision and assign variable weights. The MoM risk score for each hip was then created by averaging the weighted values of each predictive variable.Introduction
Methods
Complication and revision rates have shown to be high for all metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings, especially for the ASR Hip System (ASR hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and ASR XL total hip arthroplasty (THA)). This prompted the global recall of the ASR Hip System in 2010. Many studies have previously explored the association between female gender and revision surgery MoM HRA implants; yet less research has been dedicated to exploring this relationship in MoM THA. The first purpose of this study was to assess the associations between gender and implant survival, as well as adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR), in patients with MoM THA. Secondly, we sought to report the differences between genders in metal ion levels and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with MoM THA. The study population consisted of 729 ASR XL THA patients (820 hips) enrolled from September 2012 to June 2015 in a multicenter follow-up study at a mean of 6.4 (3–11) years from index surgery. The mean age at the time of index surgery was 60 (22–95) years and 338 were women (46%). All patients enrolled had complete patient and surgical demographic information, blood metal ion levels and PROMs obtained within 6 months, and a valid AP pelvis radiograph dating a maximum of 2 years prior to consent. Blood metal ion levels and PROMs were then obtained annually after enrollment. A sub-set of patients from a single center had annual metal artifact reduction sequence (MARS) MRI performed and were analyzed for the presence of moderate-to-severe ALTR.Introduction
Methods
The role of arthroscopy in the treatment of soft-tissue
injuries associated with proximal tibial fractures remains debatable.
Our hypothesis was that MRI over-diagnoses clinically relevant associated
soft-tissue injuries. This prospective study involved 50 consecutive
patients who underwent surgical treatment for a split-depression fracture
of the lateral tibial condyle (AO/OTA type B3.1). The mean age of
patients was 50 years (23 to 86) and 27 (54%) were female. All patients
had MRI and arthroscopy. Arthroscopy identified 12 tears of the
lateral meniscus, including eight bucket-handle tears that were
sutured and four that were resected, as well as six tears of the
medial meniscus, of which five were resected. Lateral meniscal injuries
were diagnosed on MRI in four of 12 patients, yielding an overall
sensitivity of 33% (95% confidence interval (CI) 11 to 65). Specificity
was 76% (95% CI 59 to 88), with nine tears diagnosed among 38 menisci
that did not contain a tear. MRI identified medial meniscal injuries
in four of six patients, yielding an overall sensitivity of 67%
(95% CI 24 to 94). Specificity was 66% (95% CI 50 to 79), with 15
tears diagnosed in 44 menisci that did not contain tears. MRI appears to offer only a marginal benefit as the specificity
and sensitivity for diagnosing meniscal injuries are poor in patients
with a fracture. There were fewer arthroscopically-confirmed associated
lesions than reported previously in MRI studies. Cite this article:
Syndesmotic malreduction or failure to restore fibular length are the leading causes for early reoperation after ankle fracture surgery. Anatomic fracture reduction and congruent ankle mortise can be achieved in the majority of cases following revision surgery. The goal of ankle fracture surgery is to restore anatomical congruity. However, anatomic reduction is not always achieved, and residual talar displacement and postoperative malreduction predispose a patient to post-traumatic arthritis and poor functional outcomes. The present study aimed to determine the most common surgical errors resulting in early reoperation following ankle fracture surgery.Summary
Introduction
