Total knee replacement in a commonly performed procedure in the United Kingdom with more than 76000 primary procedures performed in 2010. With so many procedures performed there has to be a robust way of assessing the outcome of the procedure. Gait analysis is a valuable tool in objectively assessing the these patients. Inertial movement units (IMU's) are a fairly new development in gait analysis. The aim of our project is to use IMUs to assess the differences in gait profile between a cohort of healthy controls, a group of pre operative knee replacement patients, a group of 8 week post operative patients and finally a group of post operative knee replacement patients at 1 year. We studied a total of 47 patients. We also had data from a previous study done on healthy controls using the same measurement tool. We measured three parameters: peak swing phase flexion, peak stance phase flexion and stride duration. Our findings indicate that pre-operative patients have a significantly reduced peak flexion in swing and stance with increased stride duration. This shows no improvement at the 8 week mark. At the 1 year mark peak flexion in swing returns to pre operative levels but flexion in stance and stride duration are still poor. These findings may not have been identified without gait analysis. Gait analysis using intertial movement units will add much information to radiographs and clinical examination. This information can also be used to tailor individual patients rehabilitation.
Knowledge of knee kinetics and kinematics contributes to our understanding of the patho-mechanics of knee pathology and rehabilitation and a mobile system for use in the clinic is desirable. We set out to assess validity and reliability of ambulatory Inertial Motion Unit (IMU) Sensors (Pegasus¯) against an established optoelectronic system (CODA¯). Pegasus¯ uses inertial sensors placed on subjects' thighs and lower leg segments to directly measure orientation of these segments with respect to gravity. CODA¯) models the position of joint centres based on tracked positions of optical markers placed on a subject, providing 3D kinematics of the subject's hips, knees and ankles in all three planes. Intra observer reliability of the Pegasus¯ system was tested on 6 volunteers (4 male; 2 female) with no previous lower limb or knee pathology. IMU's were placed on the long axis of the lateral aspects of both thighs and lower leg segments. A test re-test protocol was used with sagittal data angle collected around a standard circuit. Inter-observer reliability was tested by placement of IMU's by 5 different testers on a single volunteer. To test validity, we collected simultaneous sagittal knee angle data from Pegasus¯ and CODA¯ in two subjects. The presence of IMU's did not compromise positioning of optical markers.Introduction
Methods
