Background: Trochanteric bursitis is a common and poorly understood complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of symptomatic trochanteric bursitis and the change in hip offset among THA patients before and after the introduction of robotic assistance. Retrospective chart review of THAs performed by a single over a 3-year period between 1/5/2013 and 6/28/2016. Between 1/5/2013 and 11/11/2014 101 consecutive patients were identified that underwent manual posterior-lateral THA that utilized traditional cup positioning method based on AP Pelvis radiograph. The subsequent six-month period during a complete transition to robotic arm assistance for posterior-lateral THA was excluded to eliminate any learning curve or selection bias. Between 6/2015 and 6/2016 109 consecutive patients that underwent robotic arm-assisted. Medical records were reviewed for symptomatic trochanteric bursitis within two years of surgery. Hip offset was measured on preoperative and postoperative AP pelvis radiographs and postoperative joint reactive forces were calculated using Martell's Hip Analysis Suite.Introduction
Methods
Wear debris generation in metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has emerged as a compelling issue. In the UK, clinically significant fretting corrosion was reported at head-taper junctions of MOM hip prostheses from a single manufacturer (Langton 2011). This study characterizes the prevalence of fretting and corrosion at various modular interfaces in retrieved MOM THA systems used in the United States. 106 MOM bearing systems were collected between 2003 and 2012 in an NIH-supported, multi-institutional retrieval program. From this collection, 88 modular MOM THA devices were identified, yielding 76 heads and 31 stems (22 modular necks) of 7 different bearing designs (5 manufacturers) for analysis. 10 modular CoCr acetabular liners and 5 corresponding acetabular shells were also examined. Mean age at implantation was 58 years (range, 30–85 years) and implantation time averaged 2.2 ± 1.8 years (range, 0–11.0 years). The predominant revision reason was loosening (n=52). Explants were cleaned and scored at the head taper, stem taper, proximal and distal neck tapers (for modular necks), liner, and shell interfaces in accordance with the semi-quantitative method of Goldberg et al. (2002).Introduction
Methods and Materials
Total hip replacements using highly cross-linked polyethylene show excellent clinical outcomes, low wear, and minimal lysis at 5 years follow-up. A recent RSA study reports a significant increase in femoral head penetration between 5 and 7 years. This study is a multi-center radiographic analysis to determine whether the RSA observation is present in a large patient cohort. Six centers were enrolled for radiographic analysis of primary total hip arthroplasty for standard head sizes (26mm, 28mm, or 32mm). Radiographic inclusion criteria required a minimum of four films per patient at the following time points: 1 year; 2–4.5 years; 4.5–5.5 years; and 5.5–11 years. The Martell Hip Analysis Suite was used to analyze pelvic radiographs resulting in head penetration values. Wear rates were determined in two ways: the longest follow-up radiograph compared to the 1 year film, and individual linear regressions for the early and late periods. For both methods, average wear rates from the early period (1 to 5.5 years) and late period (>5.5 years) were compared using t-tests.Introduction
Methods
The purpose of this study was to organize a multicenter radiographic study involving leading medical centers in the U.S. having the longest-term follow-up available on this type of highly cross-linked polyethylene in order to determine if the RSA observation can be confirmed in a larger study. Six academic centers agreed to contribute radiographic data to this study. All patients received primary total hip replacements with Longevity polyethylene liners (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) coupled with 26, 28, and 32mm cobalt chrome femoral heads. The radiographic inclusion criteria required a minimum of four radiographs per patient: one at 1 year; at least one from 2 to 4.5 years; one 4.5 to 5.5 years; and at least one from 5.5 to 9 years follow-up. The Martell Hip Analysis Suit-eTM software was used for the wear analysis. All wear values were determined by calculating head penetration between the follow-up radiograph and the 1-year radiograph to remove creep, the majority of which has been shown to occur during the first year. Separate linear regressions, representing the wear rates, were computed for the early period from 1 year to 5.5 years and the late period from 5.5 years to 9 years follow-up. The Zar test was used to determine the significance of the difference between these two linear regressions. We present the completed analysis of 165 hips. When the early and late data points were combined into one data set, the second-order regression indicated an inflection point at 6.3 years with a slightly positive inflection. There were 402 film comparisons in the early time period, and the slope and confidence interval of the regression line was 4.9μm/yr (95% CI of −28μm/yr to 38μm/yr). There were 188 film comparisons in the late period, and slope of the regression line for the late period was 10.8 μm/yr (95% CI of −58μm/yr to 80μm/yr). The Zar test showed no significant difference between the two slopes (Figure 1, p=0.886). No significant increase in femoral head penetration was found for the late period after 5 years compared to the early period before 5 years follow-up in either analysis. Additionally, no significant late increase in wear was seen within individuals. While we continue to enroll patients, at this time we do not observe the increase in wear seen in the RSA study after 5 years.
There is a relative risk of 3.0 of dislocation in cups with ≤15 degrees of anteversion compared with >
15 degrees of anteversion. This difference in dislocation is statistically significant (p<
0.01). Increased femoral offset compared with the normal contralateral hip is statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of dislocation (p=0.03). Change in leg length is not associated with dislocation risk.
The increase in femoral offset in the prosthetic hip compared with the normal contralateral hip and its association with dislocation may be due to intraoperative attempts to compensate for an unstable hip by increasing offset. These results indicate that a surgeon should be cautious when increasing femoral offset alone to try and compensate for a potentially unstable hip. Other factors, for example acetabular version should be addressed, with readjustment of cup position intra-operatively if required.
Despite favourable wear characteristics of compression molded HMWPE in vitro preliminary data show no statistical difference in wear between RAM extruded HMWPE and compression moulded polyethylene. This study reviews AP and lateral radiographs for wear using the Martell technique at two, five years and maximum follow up (mean 88.2 months). Reduced implant survivorship due to aseptic loosening has prompted research into alternative bearing materials. Simulator testing is useful but clinical studies are the gold standard to evaluate the wear characteristics of new bearing materials. On hundred and twelve patients matched for sex, age, body mass index, primary pathology, Charnley grade, and follow up underwent uncemented total hip replacement using an identical implant. Group One (sixty-four patients) had a RAM extruded liner (GUR 4150 HP) and Group Two (forty-eight patients) had a compression molded liner (Montell H 1900). HMWPE sterilisation regimes were identical. AP and lateral radiographs were analysed for wear using the Martell technique at two, five years and maximum follow up (mean 88.2 months). Preliminary data show a linear and volumetric wear rate in Group One of 0.067 mm/yr and 26 mm3/year respectively between two years to maximum follow up. Similarly, the wear rates for Group Two were 0.132 mm/yr and 45 mm3/year respectively. There was no statistical difference in acetabular osteolysis between Group One (16.3%) and Group Two (15%) patients at maximum follow up. Despite favourable wear characteristics of compression molded HMWPE in vitro preliminary data show no statistical difference in wear between RAM extruded HMWPE and compression moulded polyethylene. Quality of the wear debris is more likely to be important in producing aseptic loosening than actual wear rate.
The purpose of this study was to compare the 2D and 3D linear and volume wear readings of the three most commonly used methods for measuring polyethylene wear: the Livermore, Devane and Martell techniques. Inter-observer variation of measurements using the techniques of Devane and of Martell on conventional radiographs was also performed. The radiographs of 80 patients (mean age 60+/−10 yrs) who had a Harris-Galante I total hip arthroplasty were measured. Nine different reviewers for the Devane technique readings including Dr Devane and eight reviewers for the Martell technique readings including Dr Martell made blinded independent wear observations for each radiograph set. One reviewer measured the 20 annual linear wear rate for all radiograph sets using the 2D Livermore technique. Inter-observer variation as a function of patient, reviewer, and total variation was statistically assessed using variance component analysis. Mean wear measured using the Livermore technique was the same as with the Devane and Martell method, but with a greater variation. Comparison of the Devane and Martell method for patient STD, reviewer STD, error STD (multiple reviews of same radiographs), total STD (randomly picked reviewer), mostly show a mean 50% lower STD with the Devane technique. Correlation (correlation coefficient of two randomly selected reviewers) is significantly better with the Devane technique.