Stemmed tibial components are frequently used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, overall pain, and diaphyseal tibial pain in patients who underwent revision TKA with cemented or uncemented stemmed tibial components. This is a retrospective cohort study involving 110 patients with revision TKA with cemented versus uncemented stemmed tibial components. Patients who underwent revision TKA with stemmed tibial components over a 15-year period at a single institution with at least two-year follow-up were assessed. Pain was evaluated through postal surveys. There were 63 patients with cemented tibial stems and 47 with uncemented stems. Radiographs and Knee Society Scores were used to evaluate for objective findings associated with pain or patient dissatisfaction. Postal surveys were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and the independent-samples Aims
Methods
Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming increasingly common in the United States as the population ages and larger numbers of primary TKA are performed in younger individuals. Cemented or uncemented tibial stems are frequently used in revision cases. Decreased clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction have been described for revision TKA. This study aims to determine if the presence of overall pain and tibial pain at the end of the stem differs between cemented and uncemented tibial stems in revision TKA. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing patients who underwent revision TKA utilizing cemented or uncemented tibial stems in a 15-year period at a single institution with at least two-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria included age under 18, isolated revisions of the femoral component or polyethylene exchanges, lack of preoperative or postoperative imaging, insufficient operative or implant records available for electronic chart review, revision procedures performed at outside facilities, patients who were deceased at the time of survey administration, refusal to participate in the study, and failure to return the mailed survey or respond to a telephone follow-up questionnaire. Radiographic analysis included calculation of the percentage of the tibial canal filled with the implant, as well as measurement of the diameter of the tibial stem. Radiographs were also reviewed for evidence of cavitary defects, pedestal formation, radiolucent lines, and periprosthetic fractures. Mailed surveys addressing overall pain, tibial pain, and satisfaction were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and the independent sample t-test. Logistic regression was used to adjust for age, gender, and preoperative bone loss.Introduction
Methods
