Diabetes has been associated with greater risk of complications and prolonged postoperative recovery following ankle trauma. Our cohort study reviewed the operative management and outcomes of ankle fractures in diabetic adults relative to non-diabetic adults from Jan 2016–2019. Non-diabetic controls were frequency age-matched 2:1.

34 of 572 ankle fracture presentations were in diabetic patients, 32% managed non-operatively compared to 29% of the matched non-diabetic cohort. The distribution in Lauge-Hansen fracture pattern was comparable between cohorts.

Mean length of follow-up was significantly longer for diabetics (26 weeks) compared to non-diabetics (16 weeks). Post-operative wound complications (superficial wound infection, breakdown, dehiscence) occurred in 48% of the operated diabetic ankles, compared to 5% in non-diabetics (RR 8.1, 95% CI 2.5–26.4). Reoperation (RR 4.3, 95% CI 2.5–26.4, p=0.03) and non-wound complication rates (Charcot joint, mal/non-union, metalware infection) were likewise significantly higher (RR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4–10.8, p=0.008) in diabetics. Amongst diabetics alone, those with an HbA1c >69 mmol/mol (n=14, 41%) demonstrated a significantly higher rate still of non-wound complications (RR 4.3, 95% CI 1.1–18., p=0.03) with a trend towards higher wound complication rates (RR 3, 95% CI 0.52–17, p=0.13).

Poorly controlled diabetes is associated with substantially greater complication rates following ankle fracture than those with well controlled or normal blood sugar; high HbA1c > 69mmol/mol is a significant predictor of complicated follow-up. Locally we recommend management strategies that are influenced by the fracture pattern stability and the presence or absence of complicated or poorly managed diabetes.

Unstable bicondylar tibial plateau fractures are rare and there is little guidance in the literature as to the best form of treatment. We examined the short- to medium-term outcome of this injury in a consecutive series of patients presenting to two trauma centres. Between December 2005 and May 2010, a total of 55 fractures in 54 patients were treated by fixation, 34 with peri-articular locking plates and 21 with limited access direct internal fixation in combination with circular external fixation using a Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF). At a minimum of one year post-operatively, patient-reported outcome measures including the WOMAC index and SF-36 scores showed functional deficits, although there was no significant difference between the two forms of treatment. Despite low outcome scores, patients were generally satisfied with the outcome. We achieved good clinical and radiological outcomes, with low rates of complication. In total, only three patients (5%) had collapse of the joint of > 4 mm, and metaphysis to diaphysis angulation of greater than 5º, and five patients (9%) with displacement of > 4 mm. All patients in our study went on to achieve full union.

This study highlights the serious nature of this injury and generally poor patient-reported outcome measures following surgery, despite treatment by experienced surgeons using modern surgical techniques. Our findings suggest that treatment of complex bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with either a locking plate or a TSF gives similar clinical and radiological outcomes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:956–62.

We would like to present this service evaluation of Taylor Spatial Frame use within a busy limb reconstruction unit.

We present a cohort of 60 patients representing a year of work from January 2011 to January 2012 with a breakdown of coding data. Included are details of operative episodes, length of stay, outpatient follow up including software programming episodes, strut changes and general frame care from our specialist nurses. We have produced a comparison of cost to HRG coding tarifs with an audit of coding errors and cost implications of these corrections. Also included is a breakdown of comparison data from patients undergoing frame assisted deformity correction and internal fixation, Computer Hexapod Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery.

Exact and careful coding of these procedures is required considering their relatively high cost.

Lower limb mal-alignment due to deformity is a significant cause of early degenerative change and dysfunction. Standard techniques are available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) and extent of the majority of deformities, however distal femoral deformity is difficult to assess because of the difference between anatomic and mechanical axes. We found the described technique involving constructing a line perpendicular to a line from the tip of the greater trochanter to the centre of the femoral head inaccurate, particularly if the trochanter is abnormal. We devised a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity, allowing accurate correction.

Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylized as a block. A line bisecting the axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle (Θ) between the joint and the proximal femoral axis and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of the deformity, permitting accurate correction.

We examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using 100 normal femora. Θ = 81 ± sd 2.5. As expected, Θ correlated with femoral length (r=0.74). P (expressed as the percentage of the distance from the lateral edge of the joint block to the intersection) = 61% ± sd 8%. P was not correlated with Θ.

Intra-and inter-observer errors for these measurements are within acceptable limits and observations of 30-paired normal femora demonstrate similar values for Θ and p on the two sides.

We have found this technique to be universally applicable and reliable in a variety of distal femoral deformities.

Lower limb mal-alignment due to deformity is a significant cause of early degenerative change and limb dysfunction. Standard techniques are available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) and extent of the majority of deformities, however distal femoral deformity is difficult to assess because of the difference between the anatomic and mechanical axes. We have found the described technique involving constructing a line perpendicular to a line from the tip of the greater trochanter to the centre of the femoral head inaccurate, particularly if the trochanter is abnormal. We have devised a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity, allowing accurate correction.

Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylised as a block. A line bisecting the axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle (𝛉) between the joint and the proximal femoral axis and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of the deformity, permitting accurate correction.

We have examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using one hundred normal femurs. Θ=81+/− sd 2.5°. As expected, 𝛉 correlated with femoral length (r=0.74). P (expressed as the percentage of the distal from the medial edge of the joint block to the intersection) = 61% +/− sd 8%. P was not correlated with 𝛉.

Intra-and inter-observer errors for these measurements are within acceptable limits and observations of twenty paired normal femora demonstrate similar values for 𝛉 and p on the two sides.

We have employed this technique in a variety of distal femoral deformities, including vitamin D resistant rickets, growth arrest, fibula hemimelia, post-traumatic deformity and Ellis-van Creveld syndrome. We find the system universally applicable and reliable.

A total of 57 patients, aged between 23 and 86 years, with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1 nine weeks after an isolated closed fracture of the distal radius, was randomised to receive either serial intravenous regional blockade (IVRB) with 15 mg of guanethidine in 30 ml of 0.5% prilocaine or serial IVRB with 30 ml of normal saline at weekly intervals until the tenderness in their fingers had resolved or they had received a maximum of four IVRBs.

The analgesic efficacy was assessed at 24 hours, 48 hours and one week after each procedure by the dolorimetry ratio and verbal pain scores, and at intervals up to six months after the fracture.

There was no significant difference in the number of IVRBs administered or in finger tenderness, stiffness or grip strength between the two groups. The guanethidine group experienced more pain in the affected hand (p = 0.025) and at six months had more vasomotor instability (p < 0.0001) compared with the control group.

IVRB using guanethidine offers no significant analgesic advantage over a normal saline placebo block in the treatment of early CRPS type 1 of the hand after fracture of the distal radius. It does not improve the outcome of this condition and may delay the resolution of vasomotor instability when compared with the placebo.