In the United Kingdom, over 1 million elective surgeries were cancelled due to COVID-19, resulting in over 1.9 million people now waiting more than 4 months for their procedure – 3x the number last year. To address this backlog, the healthcare service has been asked to develop locally-designed ‘COVID-light’ facilities. In our local system, 822 patients awaited orthopaedic surgery when elective surgery was permitted to resume. The phased return of service required a careful and pragmatic prioritisation of patients, to protect resources, patients, and healthcare workers. We aim to describe how the COVID-19 Algorithm for Resuming Elective Surgery (CARES) was used to consider 1) Which type of operation and patient should be prioritised? and 2) Which patients are safe to undergo surgery? The central tenets to this were patient safety, predicted efficacy of the surgery, and delivering compassionate care by considering biopsychosocial factors.Background
Aims
Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) is associated with fewer complications, faster recovery and better function than Total Knee Replacement (TKR). However, joint registries demonstrate a higher revision rate in UKR, limiting its use. Currently most UKRs are cemented and performed using a minimally invasive technique. In joint registries, common reasons for revision include aseptic loosening and pain. These problems could potentially be addressed by using cementless implants, which may provide more reliable fixation. The objectives of this study were to compare the quality of fixation (determined by the incidence and appearance of radiolucencies), and clinical outcomes of cemented and cementless UKR at five years. A randomised controlled trial was established with 63 knees (62 patients) randomised to either cemented (32 patients) or cementless UKR (30 patients). Fixation was assessed with fluoroscopic radiographs aligned to the bone-implant interface at one and five years. Outcome scores were collected pre-operatively and at one, two and five years, including Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society Score, objective and functional (AKSS-O/F) and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), expressed as absolute scores and 0–5 year change (δ) scores. Four patients died during the study period. There were no revisions. Mean operative time was 11 minutes shorter in the cementless group (p=0.029). At five years, there was no significant difference in any outcome measure except AKSS-F and δAKSS-F which were significantly better in the cementless group (both p=0.003). There were no femoral radiolucencies in either group. There were significantly more tibial radiolucencies in the cemented group (20/30 vs 2/27, p< 0.001). There were nine complete radiolucencies in the cemented group and none in the cementless group (p< 0.001). Cementless fixation provides improved fixation at five years compared to cemented fixation in UKR, maintaining equivalent or superior clinical outcomes with a shorter operative time and no increase in complications.
Indications for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) vary between units. Some authors have suggested, and many surgeons believe, that medial UKA should only be performed in patients who localise their pain to the medial joint line. This is despite research showing a poor correlation between patient-reported location of pain and radiological or operative findings in osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of patient-reported pre-operative pain location and functional outcome of UKA at one and five years. Pre-operative pain location data were collected for 406 knees (380 patients) undergoing Oxford medial UKA. Oxford Knee Score, American Knee Society Scores and Tegner activity scale were recorded preoperatively and at follow-up. 272/406 (67%) had pure medial pain, 25/406 (6%) had pure anterior knee pain and 109/406 (27%) had mixed or generalised pain. None had pure lateral pain. The primary outcome interval is one year; 132/406 patients had attained five years by the time of analysis and their five year data is presented. At one and five years, each group had improved significantly by each measure (mean δOKS 15.6 (SD 8.9) at year one, 16.3 (9.3) at year five). There was no difference between the groups, nor between patients with and without anterior knee pain or isolated medial pain. We have found no correlation between preoperative pain location and outcome. We conclude that localised medial pain should not be a prerequisite to UKA and that it may be performed in patients with generalised or anterior knee pain.
