Revision total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) can be extremely challenging due to bone loss and deformity. We present the results examining the preliminary indications and short term outcomes for the use of the Salto XT revision prosthesis. We conducted an IRB approved prospective review revision TAA performed in two institutions using the Salto XT. There were 40 patients (24 females and 16 males with an average age of 65 years (45–83), who had undergone previous TAA (Agility 27, Salto 4, STAR 4, Buechal Pappas 1), and 4 patients who underwent staged procedures for infection. The primary indications for the revision were loosening and subsidence (34), malalignment (17), cyst formation (8), infection (4).Background
Material and methods
Subtalar nonunion has a detrimental effect on patients' function, and pose a significant challenge for surgeons particularly in the setting of higher risk factors. We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of 49 subtalar nonunions between October 2001 and July 2013. Patient records and radiographs were reviewed for specific patient demographics and comorbidities, subsequent treatments, revision fusion rate, use of bone graft, complications, and clinical outcome.Background
Methods
Müller Weiss disease (MWD) is characterized by lateral navicular necrosis which is associated with a varus alignment of the subtalar joint, varying degrees of arthritis of the talonavicular-cuneiform joints and a paradoxical flatfoot deformity in advanced cases. Although arthrodesis of the hindfoot is commonly used, we present the results of a previously unreported method of treatment using a calcaneus osteotomy incorporating a wedge and lateral translation. Fourteen patients with MWD who were treated with a calcaneus osteotomy were retrospectively reviewed. There were seven females and seven males with an average age of 56 years (range 33–79), and included one grade 5, five grade 4, four grade 3 and four grade 2 patients. Patients had been symptomatic for an average of eleven years (range 1–14), and all underwent initial conservative treatment with an orthotic support that posted the heel into valgus. The primary indication for surgery was a limited but positive response to the use of the orthotic support, and a desire to avoid an arthrodesis of the hindfoot. Patients were followed for an average of three years following the procedure (range 1 – 7 years). Patients rated their pain on a visual analogue pain scale as an average of 8 (range 6–9) prior to surgery and an average of 2 postoperatively (range 0–4). The AOFAS scores improved from a mean of 29 (range 25 – 35) preoperatively to a mean of 79 (range 75–88) postoperatively. Hindfoot range of motion remained and the extent of arthritis of the navicular complex was unchanged. No patient has since required an arthrodesis. Since the majority of MWD patients respond to an orthotic support which changes the load of the hindfoot and forefoot, we believed that patients would respond positively to a calcaneal osteotomy as an alternative treatment.Results
There have been multiple techniques described to determine hindfoot alignment radiographically. The 2-dimensional nature of radiographs fails to take into account the contribution of the remainder of the foot to overall alignment. A new radiographic technique has been published in which the hindfoot alignment is calculated using the Ground Reaction Force Calcanea Offset. This technique accounts for the individual forefoot contribution to alignment, but is still limited by it´s 2-dimensional nature. The purpose of this study was to compare the hindfoot moment arm (HMA) described by Saltzman and the hindfoot alignment angle (HAA) described by Williamson, with a technique determining the ground reaction force calcaneal offset (GRF-CT) using 3-dimensional weight bearing CT Scans. The HMA, HAA, and GRF-CT 3-D weight bearing CT scans were measured by three different investigators. Each of these measurements were calculated twice on separate occasions by each investigator to determine the intra- and inter-observer reliability.Background
Methods