Distal femur fractures (DFF) are common, especially in the elderly and high energy trauma patients. Lateral locked osteosynthesis constructs have been widely used, however non-union and implant failures are not uncommon. Recent literature advocates for the liberal use of supplemental medial plating to augment lateral locked constructs. However, there is a lack of proprietary medial plate options, with some authors supporting the use of repurposing expensive anatomic pre-contoured plates. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a readily available cost-effective medial implant option.

A retrospective analysis from January 2014 to June 2022 was performed on DFF (primary or revision) managed with supplemental medial plating with a Large Fragment Locking Compression Plate (LCP) T-Plate (~$240 AUD) via a medial sub-vastus approach. The T-plate was contoured and placed superior to the medial condyle. A combination of 4.5mm cortical, 5mm locking and/or 6.5mm cancellous screws were used, with oblique screw trajectories towards the distal lateral cortex of the lateral condyle. All extra-articular fractures and revision fixation cases were allowed to weight bear immediately. The primary outcome was union rate.

This technique was utilised on sixteen patients; 3 acute, 13 revisions; mean age 52 years (range 16-85), 81% male, 5 open fractures. The union rate was 100%, with a median time to union of 29 weeks (IQR 18-46). The mean follow-up was 15 months. There were two complications: a deep infection requiring two debridements and a prominent screw requiring removal. The mean range of motion was 1–108^o.

Supplemental medial plating of DFF with a Large Fragment LCP T-Plate is a feasible, safe, and economical option for both acute fixation and revisions. Further validation on a larger scale is warranted, along with considerations to developing a specific implant in line with these principles.

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are devastating complications. Our knowledge on hip fractureassociated hemiarthroplasty PJI (HHA-PJI) is limited compared to elective arthroplasty. The goal of this study was to describe the epidemiology, risk factors, management, and outcomes for HHA-PJI.

A population-based (465,000) multicentre retrospective analysis of HHAs between 2006-2018 was conducted. PJI was defined by international consensus and treatment success as no return to theatre and survival to 90 days after the initial surgical management of the infection. Univariate, survival and competing risk regression analyses were performed.

1852 HHAs were identified (74% female; age:84±7yrs;90-day-mortality:16.7%). Forty-three (2.3%) patients developed PJI [77±10yrs; 56% female; 90-day-mortality: 20.9%, Hazard-Ratio 1.6 95%CI 1.1-2.3,p=0.023]. The incidence of HHA-PJI was 0.77/100,000/year and 193/100,000/year for HHA. The median time to PJI was 26 (IQR 20-97) days with 53% polymicrobial growth and 41% multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO). Competing risk regression identified younger age [Sub-Hazard-Ratio(SHR) 0.86, 95%CI 0.8-0.92,p<0.001], chronic kidney disease (SHR 3.41 95%CI 1.36-8.56, p=0.01), body mass index>35 (SHR 6.81, 95%CI 2.25-20.65, p<0.001), urinary tract infection (SHR 1.89, 95%CI 1.02-3.5, p=0.04) and dementia (SHR 9.4, 95%CI 2.89-30.58,p<0.001) as significant risk factors for developing HHA-PJI. When infection treatment was successful (n=15, 38%), median survival was 1632 days (IQR 829-2084), as opposed to 215 days (IQR 20-1245) in those who failed, with a 90-day mortality of 30%(n=12). There was no significant difference in success among debridement, excision arthroplasty or revision arthroplasty.

HHA PJI is uncommon but highly lethal. All currently identified predictors are non-modifiable. Due to the common polymicrobial and MDRO infections our standard antibiotic prophylaxis may not be adequate HHA-PJI is a different disease compared to elective PJI with distinct epidemiology, pathogens, risk factors and outcomes, which require targeted research specific to this unique population.

INTRODUCTION

The risk of dislocation in large diameter metal on metal hip replacement is significantly lower than in standard THR. This is due to the increased primary arc, increased jump distance and possibly a suction effect. Our unit has performed over 1500 of these cases with an overall revision rate of <1%. We report a case series of dislocations in 5 large diameter metal on metal hips undertaken at our unit.