Acute Compartment Syndrome (ACS) is an orthopaedic emergency that can develop after a wide array of etiologies. In this pilot study the MY01 device was used to assess its ease of use and its ability to continuously reflect the intracompartmental pressure (ICP) and transmit this data to a mobile device in real time. This preliminary data is from the lead site which is presently expanding data collection to five other sites as part of a multi-center study.

Patients with long bone trauma of the lower or upper extremity posing a possibility of developing compartment syndrome were enrolled in the study. Informed consent was obtained from the patients. A Health Canada licensed continuous compartmental pressure monitor (MY01) was used to measure ICP. The device was inserted in the compartment that was deemed most likely to develop ACS and ICP was continuously measured for up to 18 hours. Fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification. Patient clinical signs and pain levels were recorded by healthcare staff during routine in-patient monitoring and were compared to the ICP from the device. Important treatment information was pulled from the patient's chart to help correlate all of the patient's data and symptoms.

The study period was conducted from November 2020 through December 2021. Twenty-six patients were enrolled. There were 17 males, and nine females. The mean age was 38 years (range, 17–76). Seventeen patients received the device post-operatively and nine received it pre-operatively. Preliminary results show that post-operative ICPs tend to be significantly higher than pre-operative ICPs but tend to trend downwards very quickly. The trend in this measurement appears to be more significant than absolute numbers which is a real change from the previous literature. One patient pre-operatively illustrated a steep trend upwards with minimal clinical symptoms but required compartment release at the time of surgery that exhibited no muscle necrosis. The trend in this patient was very steep and, as predicted, predated the clinical findings of compartment syndrome. This trend allows an early warning signal of the absolute pressure, to come, in the compartment that is being assessed by the device.

Preliminary results suggest that this device is reliable and relatively easy to use within our institutions. In addition it suggests that intracompartmental pressures can be higher immediately post-op but lower rapidly when the patient does not develop ACS. These results are in line with current literature of the difference between pre and post-operative baselines and thresholds of ICP, but are much more striking, as continuous measurements have not been part of the data set in most of past studies.

Further elucidation of the pressure thresholds and profiles are currently being studied in the ongoing larger multicenter study and will add to our understanding of the critical values. This data, plus the added value of continuous trends in the pressure, upwards or downwards, will aid in preventing muscle necrosis during our management of these difficult long bone fractures.

The management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures is an issue of increasing importance for orthopaedic surgeons. Because of the expanding indications for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and an aging population with increasingly active lifestyles there has been a corresponding increase in the prevalence of these injuries. The management of these fractures is often complex because of issues with obtaining fixation around implants and dealing with osteopenic bone or compromised bone stock. In addition, these injuries frequently occur in frail, elderly patients, and the early restoration of function and ambulation is critical in these patients. There remains substantial controversy with respect to the optimal treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures, with some advocating for Locked Plating (LP), others Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing (RIMN) and finally those who advocate for Distal Femoral Replacement (DFR). The literature comparing these treatments, has been infrequent, and commonly restricted to single-center studies. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate a large series of operatively treated periprosthetic distal femur fractures from multiple centers and compare treatment strategies.

Patients who were treated operatively for a periprosthetic distal femur fracture at 8 centers across North America between 2003 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Baseline characteristics, surgical details and post-operative clinical outcomes were collected from patients meeting inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 and older, any displaced operatively treated periprosthetic femur fracture and documented 1 year follow-up. Patients with other major lower extremity trauma or ipsilateral total hip replacement were excluded. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on the type of fixation received: Locked Plating, Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing and Distal Femoral Replacement. Documented clinical follow-up was reviewed at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year following surgery. Outcome and covariate measures were assessed using basic descriptive statistics. Categorical variables, including the rate of re-operation, were compared across the three treatment groups using Fisher Exact Test.

In total, 121 patients (male: 21% / female: 79%) from 8 centers were included in our analysis. Sixty-seven patients were treated with Locked Plating, 15 with Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing, and 39 were treated with Distal Femoral Replacement. At 1 year, 64% of LP patients showed radiographic union compared to 77% in the RIMN group (p=0.747). Between the 3 groups, we did not find any significant differences in ambulation, return to work and complication rates at 6 months and 1 year (Table 1). Reoperation rates at 1 year were 27% in the LP group (17 reoperations), 16% in the DFR group (6 reoperations) and 0% in the RIMN group. These differences were not statistically significant (p=0.058).

We evaluated a large multicenter series of operatively treated periprosthetic distal femur fractures in this study. We did not find any statistically significant differences at 1 year between treatment groups in this study. There was a trend towards a lower rate of reoperation in the Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing group that should be evaluated further with prospective studies.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Distracted driving is now the number one cause of death among teenagers in the United States of America according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. However, the risks and consequences of driving while distracted spans all ages, gender, and ethnicity. The Distractions on the Road: Injury eValuation in Surgery And FracturE Clinics (DRIVSAFE) Study aimed to examine the prevalence of distracted driving among patients attending hospital-based orthopaedic surgery fracture clinics. We further aimed to explore factors associated with distracted driving.

In a large, multi-center prospective observational study, we recruited 1378 adult patients with injuries treated across four clinics (Hamilton, Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Calgary, Alberta, Halifax, Nova Scotia) across Canada. Eligible patients included those who held a valid driver's license and were able to communicate and understand written english. Patients were administered questions about distracted driving. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Patients average age was 45.8 years old (range 16 – 87), 54.3% male, and 44.6% female (1.1% not disclosed). Of 1361 patients, 1358 self-reported distracted driving (99.8%). Common sources of distractions included talking to passengers (98.7%), outer-vehicle distractions (95.5%), eating/drinking (90.4%), music listening/adjusting the radio (97.6%/93.8%), singing (83.2%), accepting phone calls (65.6%) and daydreaming (61.2%). Seventy-nine patients (6.3%), reported having been stopped by police for using a handheld device in the past. Among 113 drivers who disclosed the cause of their injury as a motor vehicle crash (MVC), 20 of them (17%) acknowledged being distracted at the time of the crash. Of the participants surveyed, 729 reported that during their lifetime they had been the driver in a MVC, with 226 (31.1%) acknowledging they were distracted at the time of the crash.

Approximately, 1 in 6 participants in this study had a MVC where they reported to be distracted. Despite the overwhelming knowledge that distracted driving is dangerous and the recognition by participants that it can be dangerous, a staggering amount of drivers engage in distracted driving on a fairly routine basis. This study demonstrates an ongoing need for research and driver education to reduce distracted driving and its devastating consequences.

The benefit of using a long intramedullary device for the treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric hip fractures is unknown. The InterTAN device (Smith and Nephew, Memphis TN) is offered in either Short (180–200 mm) or Long (260–460 mm) constructs and was designed to provide stable compression across primary intertrochanteric fracture fragments. The objective of our study was to determine whether Short InterTANs are equivalent to Long InterTANs in terms of functional and adverse outcomes for the treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric hip fractures.

108 patients with OTA classification 31A–1 and 31A–2 intertrochanteric hip fractures were included in our study and prospectively followed at one of four Canadian Level-1 Trauma Centres. Our primary outcomes included two validated primary outcome measures: the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), to measure function, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG), to measure motor performance. Secondary outcome measures included blood loss, length of procedure, length of stay and adverse events. A pre-injury FIM was measured by retrospective recall and all postoperative outcomes were assessed on postoperative day 3, at discharge, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. Unpaired t-tests and Chi-square tests were used for the comparison of continuous and categorical variables respectively between the Short and Long InterTAN groups. A statistically significant difference was defined as p<0.05.

Our study included 71 Short InterTAN and 37 Long InterTAN patients with 31A–1 and 31A–2 intertrochanteric hip fractures. Age, sex, BMI, side, living status and comorbidities were similar between the two groups. The mean operative time was significantly lower in the Short InterTAN group (61 mins) as compared to the Long InterTAN group (71 mins)(p0.05). There were 5 periprosthetic femur fractures in the short InterTAN group versus 1 in the long InterTAN group. Non-mechanical adverse outcomes such as myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infections, pneumonia and death all had similar incidence rates between the two InterTAN groups.

Both the Short and Long InterTAN patient cohorts displayed similar improvements in performance and overall function over the course of a year following intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation. The recorded operative times for Short InterTAN fixation were significantly shorter than those recorded for the Long InterTAN patients. Alternatively, a significantly higher proportion of Short InterTAN patients sustained periprosthetic femur fractures within a year of implantation as compared to the Long InterTAN group.