Vitamin E-diffused, highly crosslinked polyethylene (VEPE) and porous titanium-coated (PTC) shells were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening. The purpose of this study was: 1) to compare the wear properties of VEPE to moderately crosslinked polyethylene; 2) to assess the stability of PTC shells; and 3) to report their clinical outcomes at seven years. A total of 89 patients were enrolled into a prospective study. All patients received a PTC shell and were randomized to receive a VEPE liner (n = 44) or a moderately crosslinked polyethylene (ModXLPE) liner (n = 45). Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was used to measure polyethylene wear and component migration. Differences in wear were assessed while adjusting for body mass index, activity level, acetabular inclination, anteversion, and head size. Plain radiographs were assessed for radiolucency and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were administered at each follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
The primary purpose of the current study was to evaluate and compare the wear properties of vitamin E-doped, highly-crosslinked PE (VEPE) and one formulation of moderately cross-linked and mechanically-annealed ultra-high molecular weight PE (ModXLPE) in patients five years after primary THA. We also sought to understand whether polyethylene wear is associated with radiographic evidence of bone resorption or with deterioration in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A total of 221 patients from four international centers were recruited into a prospective RSA and clinical outcomes study. Seventy percent (76%) of patients received VEPE (vs. ModXLPE) liners, and 36% received ceramic (vs. metal) femoral heads. PROMs and radiographs were collected preoperatively and at one, two, and five years postoperatively. In addition, RSA radiographs were collected to measure PE wear. We observed similar bedding in through the one-year interval and wear through the two-year interval between the two liner types. However, there was significantly more femoral head penetration in the ModXLPE cohort compared to the VEPE cohort at the five-year follow-up (p<0.001). The only variables independently predictive of increased wear were ModXLPE (vs VEPE) liner type (β=0.22, p=0.010) and metal (vs. ceramic) femoral head type (β=0.21, p=0.013). There was no association between increased wear and radiolucency development (p=0.866) or PROMs. No patients were found to have evidence of osteolysis. At five-years postoperatively, patients treated with VEPE (vs. ModXLPE) and ceramic (vs. metal) femoral heads demonstrated decreased wear. At the longest follow-up (five years postoperatively), the wear rates for both liner groups were very low and have not led to any osteolysis or implant failures via aseptic loosening.
Osteolysis secondary to ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear is a leading cause of late-term implant failure via aseptic loosening in patients treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA). Radiation crosslinking of UHMWPE has been shown to decrease wear. However, the resulting polymer (crosslinked-PE) has a high free radical content. Two different methods that have been used to reduce the remaining free radicals are mechanical annealing and chemical stabilization using Vitamin E, a free radical scavenger. The primary purpose of the current study was to evaluate and compare the wear properties of vitamin E-doped crosslinked-PE (VEPE) and one formulation of mechanically annealed crosslinked-PE using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in patients five years after primary THA. We also sought to understand the association between polyethylene wear and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Three-hundred and five patients from six international centers were enrolled. Seventy-six percent were treated with highly-crosslinked (95 kGy) VEPE liners, and the rest received moderately-crosslinked (50 kGy) (ModXL), mechanically annealed liners. Data was collected prospectively at one-, two-, and five-year intervals. At the 5-year follow-up, proximal femoral head penetration into the VEPE liners (median = 0.05mm (range, −0.03–1.20)) was significantly lower than the penetration into the ModXL liners (median = 0.15mm (range, −0.22–1.04)) (p<0.001). In the VEPE cohort the median proximal penetration did not increase from one- to five-year follow-up (p=0.209). In contrast, there was a significant increase in femoral head penetration for the ModXL group (p<0.001) during that same time. Multivariable regression showed that the only variable predictive of increased wear was ModXL liner type (B=0.12, p<0.001). There were no differences in PROMs between the liner groups, and there was no correlation between polyethylene wear and PROMs for the cohort as a whole. The current study is the largest analysis of polyethylene wear at five-year follow-up using the RSA technique. We observed similar bedding in through the two-year interval between the two liner types, however, there was significantly more wear in the ModXL cohort at five-years. Currently, the wear rates for both liner groups are below the osteolysis threshold and have not led to any implant failures via aseptic loosening. Continued follow-up will provide a better understanding of the association between wear rate and clinical outcomes.
