Using a femoral head from one manufacturer on the stem of another manufacturer poses the risk that the taper interface between the components do not contact correctly and the performance of the joint will be impaired. The cohorts in this study are a combination of modular Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) and Adept femoral heads on CPT stems. The study reviews the geometry of the taper interfaces to establish if the taper clearance angles was outside of the normal range for other taper interfaces. In addition the rates of material loss from the bearings and taper and a ranking of the stem damage were reviewed to determine if the levels of loss were above that seen for other similar joints. The material loss analysis demonstrated that the rates or levels of loss from the bearings, taper and stem are no different to levels published for manufacturer matched joints and in many cases are lower. The results demonstrate that the taper clearance angles for the mixed manufacturer joints (BHR-CPT: 0.067 to −0.116, Adept-CPT: 0.101 to −0.056) were within the range of other studies and manufacturer matched clearances (0.134 to −0.149). Using components from different manufacturers has not in this instance increased the level of material loss from the joints, when compared to other similar manufacturer matched joints.
The aim of this study was to assess the effect
of frictional torque and bending moment on fretting corrosion at
the taper interface of a modular femoral component and to investigate
whether different combinations of material also had an effect. The
combinations we examined were 1) cobalt–chromium (CoCr) heads on
CoCr stems 2) CoCr heads on titanium alloy (Ti) stems and 3) ceramic
heads on CoCr stems. In test 1 increasing torque was imposed by offsetting the stem
in the anteroposterior plane in increments of 0 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm and
8 mm when the torque generated was equivalent to 0 Nm, 9 Nm, 14
Nm and 18 Nm. In test 2 we investigated the effect of increasing the bending
moment by offsetting the application of axial load from the midline
in the mediolateral plane. Increments of offset equivalent to head
+ 0 mm, head + 7 mm and head + 14 mm were used. Significantly higher currents and amplitudes were seen with increasing
torque for all combinations of material. However, Ti stems showed
the highest corrosion currents. Increased bending moments associated
with using larger offset heads produced more corrosion: Ti stems
generally performed worse than CoCr stems. Using ceramic heads did
not prevent corrosion, but reduced it significantly in all loading
configurations. Cite this article:
